Jump to content

Netgear Zing 771S tri band LTE mobile hotspot discussion


Recommended Posts

Ok, I wasn't really sure where to post this since there isn't a specific forum for data-only devices.

 

I picked up a Netgear Zing hotspot today and am anxious to give it a try. Unfortunately LTE service in my home and out and about still isn't great (-107 or so signal) unless I go outside as the tower nearest my home hasn't been upgraded yet. But just in general I noticed there was a few external antenna ports on the device and was curious if anyone knew of a compatible antenna that I could use?

 

I see Netgear sells a few but they don't list LTE as supported, but do have CDMA 1900. As for an antenna I can't imagine there's much difference as long as the frequency is correct. Am I incorrect in saying this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Any of you check for updates recently? I just updated my Zing today and I now have the "Spark" Logo!   

Software update:   NTG9X15C_45.04.12.05   02/05/2014   Fixes: OMA PRL fix Data Link HA fix

Okay.. with a lot of good information from this FORUM and some private messaging back and forth - I think I have my home setup working the way that I want it too... at least this week!   Here are some

Posted Images

Ok, I wasn't really sure where to post this since there isn't a specific forum for data-only devices.

 

I picked up a Netgear Zing hotspot today and am anxious to give it a try. Unfortunately LTE service in my home and out and about still isn't great (-107 or so signal) unless I go outside as the tower nearest my home hasn't been upgraded yet. But just in general I noticed there was a few external antenna ports on the device and was curious if anyone knew of a compatible antenna that I could use?

 

I see Netgear sells a few but they don't list LTE as supported, but do have CDMA 1900. As for an antenna I can't imagine there's much difference as long as the frequency is correct. Am I incorrect in saying this?

Interesting. What sort of adapter does the external antenna port have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. What sort of adapter does the external antenna port have?

 

It's got two SMB plugs, according to Netgear it does multiple input/output.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's got two SMB plugs, according to Netgear it does multiple input/output.

I am into amateur radio and this setup is interesting. I wonder what sort of wideband antenna would exist to even be usable over the 800/1900/2500 bands. I would venture to say such an antenna with these wide ranges wouldn't be very effective at all and maintain SWR. I see it has two antenna ports - perhaps one is for the 800 band and the other one is for the 1900/2500 band?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am into amateur radio and this setup is interesting. I wonder what sort of wideband antenna would exist to even be usable over the 800/1900/2500 bands. I would venture to say such an antenna with these wide ranges wouldn't be very effective at all and maintain SWR. I see it has two antenna ports - perhaps one is for the 800 band and the other one is for the 1900/2500 band?

 

I took it to my dad (he's a ham too) to see if he knew but didn't have much of an idea. Thankfully his curiosity has him going so he's looking too. 

 

I'm not sure if what the difference between the two ports is, I just have the information from Netgear's web site. I was going to see if I could find any FCC approval docs for it to see if there was more info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I wasn't really sure where to post this since there isn't a specific forum for data-only devices.

 

I picked up a Netgear Zing hotspot today and am anxious to give it a try. Unfortunately LTE service in my home and out and about still isn't great (-107 or so signal) unless I go outside as the tower nearest my home hasn't been upgraded yet. But just in general I noticed there was a few external antenna ports on the device and was curious if anyone knew of a compatible antenna that I could use?

 

I see Netgear sells a few but they don't list LTE as supported, but do have CDMA 1900. As for an antenna I can't imagine there's much difference as long as the frequency is correct. Am I incorrect in saying this?

 

Unfortunately Sprint's LTE is on the PCS G block - unless the antennas say they specifically support the G block, they probably won't help you with LTE. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took it to my dad (he's a ham too) to see if he knew but didn't have much of an idea. Thankfully his curiosity has him going so he's looking too. 

 

I'm not sure if what the difference between the two ports is, I just have the information from Netgear's web site. I was going to see if I could find any FCC approval docs for it to see if there was more info.

 

Here is the link to the FCC docs: Novatel MiFi 500 LTE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately Sprint's LTE is on the PCS G block - unless the antennas say they specifically support the G block, they probably won't help you with LTE. 

 

So as long as I find an antenna that supports the G block I should be good? I've found several but they all specifically list 3G/CDMA service and not LTE. But I was under the impression (and correct me if I'm wrong) that the antenna just needs to support the specific frequency not necessarily a specific technology as the radio handles that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So as long as I find an antenna that supports the G block I should be good? I've found several but they all specifically list 3G/CDMA service and not LTE. But I was under the impression (and correct me if I'm wrong) that the antenna just needs to support the specific frequency not necessarily a specific technology as the radio handles that?

Absolutely. Shouldn't matter what comes out of the antenna as long as its the right frequency.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There seem to be 3 threads discussing tri-band hotspots (2500 LTE, Sprint Tri-Band Hotspots, and this one), so I am guessing which is best for this post.

 

I bought a Netgear Zing at a big box store tonight, being too impatient to mess with "free" offers and shipping. A couple of observations:

 

1. No LTE 2500 in the northwest Chicago exurbs (yet?). I drove near multiple Clear Wimax towers, within 200 feet of 1, but only saw band 25 LTE (1900) and CDMA, no band 41.

 

2. The menus take a little getting used to, but the device will show you a lot of information.

 

3. The Zing has a very good antenna. I live on the very fringe of current Chicagoland LTE, and my GS3 connects only intermittantly, and has been virtually useless as a hotspot at my home. The Zing gets about a 4-8 dBm better RSRP reading than my GS3 in exactly the same spot (unfortunately, this spot has to be in an open, 2nd floor, south facing window -- told you I am on the fringe!), and is consistently connected and useful. I am browsing the forum and editing this entry from a tablet connected through the hotspot, and responses are quite good, especially considering how "fringy" my location is.

 

With apologies to A J and digiblur, this is a speed test using LTE on my GS3 (2nd line) and using the hotspot (top line), for what it's worth. Note that the ping is better when using LTE directly from the phone, but the speeds are significantly worse.

 

Screenshot_2013-07-24-22-53-02.png

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

With apologies to A J and digiblur, this is a speed test using LTE on my GS3 (2nd line) and using the hotspot (top line), for what it's worth:attachicon.gifScreenshot_2013-07-24-22-53-02.png

 

In this case, a good use of a speedtest. To test the abilities of two different devices in the same location. Shows how much stronger the hotspot is compared to a regular mobile device.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the things that I like about the Netgear Zing is that you can prioritize which LTE band you want to use. Obviously that's not very useful right now, but once LTE is widely available on 800MHz, 1900MHz and 2.5GHz that could become a useful feature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the things that I like about the Netgear Zing is that you can prioritize which LTE band you want to use. Obviously that's not very useful right now, but once LTE is widely available on 800MHz, 1900MHz and 2.5GHz that could become a useful feature.

Hmm, I haven't discovered that ability yet. Where is that located?

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, I haven't discovered that ability yet. Where is that located?

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

It's in the advanced settings of the Zing manager browser interface. I'll try and get a screenshot up ASAP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's in the advanced settings of the Zing manager browser interface. I'll try and get a screenshot up ASAP.

Requires MSL code. Guess I'll have to call Sprint and get that.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take this as anecdotal, but a friend who has the Franklin U770 (so PCS-only LTE) got a big LTE performance boost (also in a fringe area) by connecting the 3G antenna port (weird, I know) to his old WISP antenna, a 24 dbi grid at 2.4 GHz (1.9 and 2.4 are close enough that the loss in gain isn't too big...and of course 2.5/2.6 is right there...though we're talking about a single-pol antenna). It could just be that turning off the 3G antenna on-device helped throughput, and plugging in the single-pol antenna to one of the 4G antenna ports resulted in a device that wouldn't boot (temporary issue) but 2.4 GHz antennas are cheap and could provide a nice boost to folks who are in marginal areas right now.

 

I think antennas of that caliber are already being used by some people with the Clear WiMAX desktop modems (with the appropriate adapter), so maybe this is a little more than anecdotal :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as antennas go, if it covers PCS A-F it almost certainly covers PCS G too unless they have some sort of filter in the cabling. It may not be optimal for G but pushing another 5 MHz on something designed to cover 100MHz isn't much of a difference.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

So, delta, been a while since you posted..how is the Zing working out in your fringe LTE location?  Did you get any help

from an external antenna?  I'm getting -114 dBm fringe signal myself at the house  (won't connect) and wonder if the Zing

would connect..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I modified my search for LTE on the Zing, so now the priority is 41, 25, 26, so I'm really curious to see what deployment exists on 41 here in the greater NYC area. I know for a fact that none of the CLWR sites by my house have LTE onair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I modified my search for LTE on the Zing, so now the priority is 41, 25, 26, so I'm really curious to see what deployment exists on 41 here in the greater NYC area. I know for a fact that none of the CLWR sites by my house have LTE onair.

Keep us all posted on your activities with band 41; I have two CLWR (wimax) towers near me that I get Wimax on and

they make great candidates for an LTE makeover as they are collocated with Sprint ; the Sprint gear is in the process

of upgrades (one is completed awaiting backhaul)..so I see a Zing in my future (I hope)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep us all posted on your activities with band 41; I have two CLWR (wimax) towers near me that I get Wimax on and

they make great candidates for an LTE makeover as they are collocated with Sprint ; the Sprint gear is in the process

of upgrades (one is completed awaiting backhaul)..so I see a Zing in my future (I hope)

 

Same here, almost every CLWR site in my town is colocated. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy Zing owners, (including you, Robert) if I buy the device outright does Sprint force

me into a 2 Yr contract in order to get it activated?  Are there other activation alternatives?

I notice Ting does not offer it nor others I've looked at..TIA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy Zing owners, (including you, Robert) if I buy the device outright does Sprint force

me into a 2 Yr contract in order to get it activated?  Are there other activation alternatives?

I notice Ting does not offer it nor others I've looked at..TIA

 

They wouldn't let me buy it outright at all.  :(

 

Robert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Is it easy to put back together in a way where they wouldn't know that you look it apart?
    • It depends on the device, and what the carrier_policy file from the ROM dictates. On devices still receiving updates, they'll probably enable it. Older ones not. For example, the Pixel 1 has b41 disabled entirely with a T-mobile SIM. No way to enable it without a software update, which won't come. On newer devices, they typically leave all bands enabled, but limit the carrier aggregation combos that a device will use/report based on the SIM and PLMN. Since T-mobile didn't use B41 before, they probably don't enable those CA combos. But they should get enabled with an Android update for the device at some point. They still don't have all the CA combos correct on my Pixel 4 XL, but thankfully I can enable them all with EFS Explorer until then. The reason why they limit CA combos reported by the device is because the LTE signaling message where the device reports it's capabilities has a max size. With modern devices, the number of supported combos exceeds the message size, and gets truncated, resulting in your device potentially not using supported combos on the network. So instead they limit the device to report only a subset of combos based on the PLMN. The downside to this is if a new band is deployed, the devices needs a software update to enable it for that PLMN.
    • That's very good. I'm glad to see T-Mobile building out there coverage. I have T-Mobile they have tremendously improved their LTE coverage in my area along with fringe coverage performance. Hope to see more improvements.
    • Ok update with in the last couple days (while I’m isolation) I have noticed while on my home tower (Fashion Square Mall less than 1/4 mile from my apartment) it has gone back to normal with 200+ upload and 60+ upload. 
    • Speaking of strange setups, found this out in Bushwick. No idea what that little antenna is.  
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...