Jump to content

Switch and Wireline technicians being brought back from Ericsson


Geesmill

Recommended Posts

One of my buddies who is an Ericsson technician told me they had a meeting and Sprint wants to bring the wireline (fiber techs) and switch techs back in house. My friend is not overly enthused as his benefits, wages and retirement all have increased as an Ericsson employee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand your friend's angst, but this is an interesting development nonetheless. I wonder if this is an indictment of the job that Sprint/Son thinks that Ericcson has done. Of course, Sprint's agreement with Ericsson doesn't end until 2016 I believe so I wonder what the endgame might be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand your friend's angst, but this is an interesting development nonetheless. I wonder if this is an indictment of the job that Sprint/Son thinks that Ericcson has done. Of course, Sprint's agreement with Ericsson doesn't end until 2016 I believe so I wonder what the endgame might be.

 

Asian corporations are all about efficiency which most of the time leads to vertical integration (cough LG / Samsung / Sony / etc). Looks like Son wants to bring everything back in house to increase the reliability and efficiency of their network management teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asian corporations are all about efficiency which most of the time leads to vertical integration (cough LG / Samsung / Sony / etc). Looks like Son wants to bring everything back in house to increase the reliability and efficiency of their network management teams.

 

I think saying he wishes to bring everything in house is a bit presumptuous. I'd like if that we're true but I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The initial numbers are around 600 - 700 people.  I think around 7000 converted initially, but I don't remember for sure.  I'm pretty sure they already brought back about 250 about a year ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes in house is better.  Cheaper probably.   I wouldn't mind working on cell towers if I knew how to apply!   I know fiber work is involved needs to be clean.  Spliced fiber before very precise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an observation:

 

While setting up our new SIP service to Sprint Wholesale, Ericsson was on the call. The SIP switch Sprint seems to use is the same Nortel model that Verizon Business uses. So it didn't make sense to have Ericsson listening in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700 are moving, split 500/200 into different segments, can't remember which side gets which though.

 

It is an adjustment to the existing Network Advantage Agreement between Sprint/Ericsson due to changes in network infrastructure and planning that have come with Network Vision.

 

Ericsson managed just about everything, including planning on a bunch of stuff in the old agreement, Sprint wants to move a significant portion of that planning and development back in-house instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like with other companies, that whole outsource thing ain't working out.

 

I've never agreed with outsourcing. It just seems like there have always been too many flaws in the idea.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turns out if you want a network that performs well, you need to be in control of its development. I always beleived this had a lot to do with the performance of Shentel vs Sprint

EXACTLY.  Great Comparison.  Just take a snapshot of Shentel territory and compare it to Sprint's progress in the balance of the country. Shentel has a very high percentage of their sites upgraded with 4G and 800 mhz voice.  They are in control totally and things get done correctly and on time.  No excuses, they just do it. Shentel is more complete than the S4GRU maps are showing. So many sites are going active with 4g & 800 that it all does not get updated sometimes as quickly as it should.  Apparently inspections & paperwork get delayed.  The important thing is that the NV project has made Shentel look highly superior to anybody else and even more important is that the Central Pennsylvania, Western Md, and northern Virginia territory has service that is probably the best in the country right now.

If this is a comparison of sharp management and local control against outsourcing, Shentel wins and it ain't even close. Yes, Shentel is using contractors to do most of the site work, but they are in control and do it right and on time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

EXACTLY.  Great Comparison.  Just take a snapshot of Shentel territory and compare it to Sprint's progress in the balance of the country. Shentel has a very high percentage of their sites upgraded with 4G and 800 mhz voice.  They are in control totally and things get done correctly and on time.  No excuses, they just do it. Shentel is more complete than the S4GRU maps are showing. So many sites are going active with 4g & 800 that it all does not get updated sometimes as quickly as it should.  Apparently inspections & paperwork get delayed.  The important thing is that the NV project has made Shentel look highly superior to anybody else and even more important is that the Central Pennsylvania, Western Md, and northern Virginia territory has service that is probably the best in the country right now.

If this is a comparison of sharp management and local control against outsourcing, Shentel wins and it ain't even close. Yes, Shentel is using contractors to do most of the site work, but they are in control and do it right and on time.

My last request of Shentel is that they're as hasty with the LTE 800 rollout.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last request of Shentel is that they're as hasty with the LTE 800 rollout.

Boosted20V -  Shentel has 800 voice about totally rolled out.  When they want to activate 800 LTE, I would think the cell sites would be ready with all the equipment wired up and ready to go.  I would almost bet they could turn it up right now, but there are no phones around to use it. Seeing how they operate tells me they have to be further advanced with 800 LTE than anybody else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint began outsourcing to save money. They are clearly not the only carrier who outsources, so its not fair say "shentel did it quicker, so in-sourcing is better". Sprint has the financial capacity now to bring some work back, but there are likely a plethora of reasons why.

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint began outsourcing to save money. They are clearly not the only carrier who outsources, so its not fair say "shentel did it quicker, so in-sourcing is better". Sprint has the financial capacity now to bring some work back, but there are likely a plethora of reasons why.

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

Agreed. However, I'm willing to give Shentel props. They deserve kudos. They have rocked it and look to continue strong.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Shentel is more complete than the S4GRU maps are showing. So many sites are going active with 4g & 800 that it all does not get updated sometimes as quickly as it should. Apparently inspections & paperwork get delayed.


Yes indeed. Shentel fires up their stuff the moment they inspect it. However, Sprint comes through and accepts it after Shentel. Since we do not have a direct Shentel source, we are at the mercy of finding out about complete Shentel sites after Sprint accepts them.

Up until Friday, Sprint had only accepted CDMA 800 on newly converted Shentel sites. They hadn't gone back and reinspected existing signed off sites for CDMA 800 until now. I got my first batch of CDMA 800 sign offs on existing sites yesterday. I am going to try to get them updated on the next map refresh.

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
 
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • https://www.androidauthority.com/t-mobile-sales-tactics-employee-interview-3460125/   From the "Uncarrier" to Carrier....
    • Another SCP beta is rolling out now, with some bugfixes as usual but also some fun new options to test: Non-standalone 5G-NR cells can now display Site Notes. This feature works in the same manner as how neighbor cell notes are displayed, requiring a PCI and your device's location. This option is enabled by default. As is the case with neighbor cell notes, you cannot edit NSA site notes directly unless there is an NCI being reported (which I have never seen); it uses the previously recorded standalone log entries. Like neighbor notes, if a cell has been previously logged but there is no note, you will see the distance information only.   Logging cells that are not reporting a valid PLMN is now possible. This option is disabled by default, but if you enable it along with two other options (log sites with missing GCI/NCI and to log sites with missing TAC), you should begin logging most NSA 5G-NR cells. A PCI is needed at a minimum, which is not always reported depending on your device and network factors. ("Sites" will be renamed to "cells" on the Preferences menu in the next update.)   Users can enable an option to display LTE cells above 5G-NR cells in the app if they choose to do so. This option is disabled by default. Should help improve the readability of your screen if you have NSA 5G-NR cells constantly appearing/disappearing. Please give these options a try and let me know if you notice any issues.. thanks!
    • Not yet. We probably won't see one submitted until construction on the new building is substantially complete. 
    • Yes, that is where the site used to be. All the antennas were removed. I hope they add a new site soon. Have any permits been submitted for a new site?
    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...