Jump to content

All Sprint acquisition discussion (was "Japan's Softbank in talks for $12.8 bln Sprint stake")


kckid

Recommended Posts

Why would there need to be technical compatibility for this to make sense? If it is a financial investment does technical compatibility really matter? If they see a chance to make a diversified financial investment in another country, can acquire a financially struggling carrier at a good price but a carrier that seems to have a strong plan for technical improvement, then why not? I don't see technical compatibility between the two countries to be an issue at all. Unlike a domestic merger where the goal is consolidation, increased leverage with suppliers, and cost reductions on the overhead side, this deal would seem to be all about an ROI on investment.

 

Because part of the stated rationale is that this allows them to attain better scale for product purchases and networking equipment. I would think that's only a reasonable assumption if there is some commonality between the two (or three) companies.

 

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/10/11/us-sprint-softbank-idUKBRE89A0I520121011

 

Japanese media said buying Sprint - which competes in the United States against Verizon Wireless (VZ.N) (VOD.L) and AT&T Inc (T.N) - would make it cheaper for Softbank to procure smartphones and other mobile devices.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because part of the stated rationale is that this allows them to attain better scale for product purchases and networking equipment. I would think that's only a reasonable assumption if there is some commonality between the two (or three) companies.

 

http://uk.reuters.co...E89A0I520121011

 

So spend 12B to save how much lol ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it that they just want a pressence in this market? Sprint should take note of Verizon and Vodafone relationship and how they can't get rid of each other.

 

So far VZW is working well for them. I'm sure Verizon and Vodafone would like to have 100% of the pie for themselves but it's made them a boat load of money.

 

I'm sure Sprint would be happy to have a similar problem.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should hope not. Softbank Mobile has one of the most absurd names in wireless, the equivalent of something like Bank of America Wireless or US Bank Mobile.

 

To expand on this, maybe more random corporations should buy into wireless. Chrysler Cellular? Frito-Lay Mobility? Before you know it, even some electrical utility company in the South would have its own wireless division.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

To expand on this, maybe more random corporations should buy into wireless. Chrysler Cellular? Frito-Lay Mobility? Before you know it, even some electrical utility company in the South would have its own wireless division.

 

;)

 

AJ

Southern Comfort link?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's great news. I hope they combine Sprint and Clearwire and stop this blame game split spectrum nonsense. Finally we might get nationwide Clearwire coverage including all the planned towers that Clearwire was supposed to build in the San Diego market.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So spend 12B to save how much lol ?

 

It might be a small savings in volume, but it could be a huge savings in leverage. Getting deals done when you add on the millions and millions of cell phones that are sold via Sprint create an incentive to get better deals or get custom devices made, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's great news. I hope they combine Sprint and Clearwire and stop this blame game split spectrum nonsense. Finally we might get nationwide Clearwire coverage including all the planned towers that Clearwire was supposed to build in the San Diego market.

 

Clearwire would never be nationwide, but if this combines Sprint and Clearwire, then devices can be properly configured to hit the high bandwidth 2600Mhz LTE-A carriers first, then 1900Mhz, finally 800Mhz. Since Sprint wouldn't be paying on used bandwidth contract.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearwire would never be nationwide, but if this combines Sprint and Clearwire, then devices can be properly configured to hit the high bandwidth 2600Mhz LTE-A carriers first, then 1900Mhz, finally 800Mhz. Since Sprint wouldn't be paying on used bandwidth contract.

 

Well the nationwide part was just a thought. I'm really just concerned about the towers that they had approved in my area but didn't build because they ran out of cash. Selfish me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they do combine Sprint and Clearwire, I hope they eliminate all this mess and it leads to a more rational approach to network design. I still think that Clearwire's spectrum is really better suited to fixed or at least nomadic devices and networks Maybe Sprint can even do a spectrum exchange with Dish. 40Mhz of Dish spectrum for 80Mhz of Clearwire spectrum. I still want them to acquire USCC, Leap and Metro, sell/exchnage AWS spectrum to T-Mobile and strengthen their PCS holdings. I also want them to be in the market for any sub 700MHz spectrum that becomes available.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well the nationwide part was just a thought. I'm really just concerned about the towers that they had approved in my area but didn't build because they ran out of cash. Selfish me.

 

So myopically focused. For shame! Think of the big picture. Take one for the team! :hah:

 

Just kidding, of course.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they do combine Sprint and Clearwire, I hope they eliminate all this mess and it leads to a more rational approach to network design. I still think that Clearwire's spectrum is really better suited to fixed or at least nomadic devices and networks Maybe Sprint can even do a spectrum exchange with Dish. 40Mhz of Dish spectrum for 80Mhz of Clearwire spectrum. I still want them to acquire USCC, Leap and Metro, sell/exchnage AWS spectrum to T-Mobile and strengthen their PCS holdings. I also want them to be in the market for any sub 700MHz spectrum that becomes available.

 

Cutting off 10 more UHF TV channels 40-51 would generate about 80-90MHz in the 600MHz spectrum. Getting 20 or 30 Mhz of that would be stellar, but very expensive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As pointed out above, a Clearwire combination would allow for a more cohesive, integrated and better planned multi modal network that includes EBS/BRS. So there could be advantages.

 

But I'm concerned with disadvantages. If Sprint stumbles or slows down any network improvements because they get focused on the buyout, then customers will dump Sprint in droves and go to Tmo. If they do something stupid like dump CDMA, then I may go too.

 

Also, someone asked why Softbank just buy out Clearwire if that was their intended target with 2600 assets. Well, no one can buy out Clearwire without Sprint shares. And no one can buy out the minority stake in Clearwire, because Sprint has first right of refusal. To buy out Clearwire, you have to get Sprint on board. I'm not suggesting this is what is going on. However, Sprint is an obstacle to anyone wanting Clearwire.

 

My head is spinning. I did not see this coming.

 

At least if Softbank does buy out Sprint and they change the name (which would be foolish), then we could still be S4GRU. At least they both start with S! I knew the optimist would come out in me.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the nationwide part was just a thought. I'm really just concerned about the towers that they had approved in my area but didn't build because they ran out of cash. Selfish me.

 

I would be happy if Clear would just upgrade the WiMax protection sites to LTE protection sites. My ultimate wish would be for the top 150 metropolitan areas getting coverage. Not talking the suburbs, just the high traffic/high population areas.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cutting off 10 more UHF TV channels 40-51 would generate about 80-90MHz in the 600MHz spectrum. Getting 20 or 30 Mhz of that would be stellar, but very expensive

 

Remember also that due to the asymmetric nature of data consumption, we no longer need symmetric FDD spectrum allocation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still want them to acquire USCC, Leap and Metro, sell/exchnage AWS spectrum to T-Mobile and strengthen their PCS holdings.

 

Are you a wireless enthusiast or an investor? Can we stop with the "acquire the regional carriers" broken record? Sprint does not need native coverage in rural Nebraska.

 

28181838.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lipton Iced-T-Mobile?

 

This is the South that we are talking about. That would be Lipton Sweet-T-Mobile.

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we now have official confirmation of deal talks from Sprint.

 

http://blogs.wsj.com...r/?mod=yahoo_hsc

 

Sprint Confirms Discussions with Softbank on a Possible Transaction

OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (BUSINESS WIRE), October 11, 2012 – Sprint (NYSE: S) today confirmed that it is currently engaged in discussions with Softbank regarding a potential substantial investment by Softbank in Sprint. Although there can be no assurances that these discussions will result in any transaction or on what terms any transaction may occur, such a transaction could involve a change of control of Sprint. Sprint does not intend to comment further unless and until an agreement is reached.

 

Edit: I see several of you had the same idea. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember also that due to the asymmetric nature of data consumption, we no longer need symmetric FDD spectrum allocation.

 

Agreed, that is why LTE-A is great. In 40Mhz of 600Mhz spectrum do 2 carriers of 15Mhz x 5Mhz. Huge coverage/penetration, large down stream pipe, regular upstream pipe. Drool...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all of this, I just want to know what Craig Moffett thinks. His opinion matters so much to me. I don't think I can rest until I hear what he has to say.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...