Jump to content
RoccoM

What is a realistic ETA for Long Island?

Recommended Posts

I know that deployment in Central NJ and NYC is happening as we speak, but I'm alarmed that Long Island is treated as an entirely separate market as Long Island customers got completely hosed by Clearwire during the WiMax rollout.

 

I'm really tempted to leave for Verizon.

 

The furthest point east that WiMax was ever deployed was Rockville Centre and 3G is borderline unusable during peak hours.

Edited by RoccoM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that deployment in Central NJ and NYC is happening as we speak, but I'm alarmed that Long Island is treated as an entirely separate market as Long Island customers got completely hosed by Clearwire during the WiMax rollout.

 

I'm really tempted to leave for Verizon.

 

The furthest point east that WiMax was ever deployed was Rockville Centre and 3G is borderline unusable during peak hours.

 

Although we are not prepared to announce Long Island yet, I will tell you Long Island comes out with a full deployment in a decent spot in the national schedule. It will not be relegated to the nether regions like it was in the Clearwire deployment. Stay tuned.

 

- Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although we are not prepared to announce Long Island yet, I will tell you Long Island comes out with a full deployment in a decent spot in the national schedule. It will not be relegated to the nether regions like it was in the Clearwire deployment. Stay tuned.

 

- Robert

 

is my area in a decent spot in the nation schedule?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is my area in a decent spot in the nation schedule?

 

Since I have seen the whole national schedule, and am the closest thing to being objective around here, I would say where Long Island fits in the schedule makes sense. In my opinion, Long Island should be near the top of secondary markets. And Sprint appears to be thinking the same way as I am.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since I have seen the whole national schedule, and am the closest thing to being objective around here, I would say where Long Island fits in the schedule makes sense. In my opinion, Long Island should be near the top of secondary markets. And Sprint appears to be thinking the same way as I am.

I am in the middle of kansas but its good to see many many areas on schedule

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its good to know that Long Island is near the top of the secondary markets.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in Phoenix, and havent heard a thing ( :( )... but, I'm still glad to see all the good things happening to Sprints network.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my view, actually very foolish for sprint to classify this area as a secondary market.

 

Its a very densely populated area that shares three million people between the two counties and is among the highest income per capita areas of the country.

 

They also used to own the area outright and have tons of former customers that they could lure back if they got this done in a timely fashion.

Edited by RoccoM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my view, actually very foolish for sprint to classify this area as a secondary market.

 

Its a very densely populated area that shares three million people between the two counties and is among the highest income per capita areas of the country.

 

They also used to own the area outright and have tons of former customers that they could lure back if they got this done in a timely fashion.

U think the high income ppl use sprint?....

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm talking about in aggregate.

 

The fact that the average sprint post-paid customer might skew slightly towards the lower end of the middle class compared to ATT/Verizon is more or less irrelevant. The fact that the area is virtually uniformly middle class means that this area has a much better post-paid/pre-paid mix than either Queens or the Bronx with only a minor drop-off in density and that they're screwing up by relegating it to a second tier.

 

U think the high income ppl use sprint?....

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Edited by RoccoM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my view, actually very foolish for sprint to classify this area as a secondary market.

 

Its a very densely populated area that shares three million people between the two counties and is among the highest income per capita areas of the country.

 

They also used to own the area outright and have tons of former customers that they could lure back if they got this done in a timely fashion.

 

Everyone wants their market to be upgraded ASAP. There are a pile of larger markets than Long Island that have not been announced yet. At this point, the markets that are announced will be complete within months of each other.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone wants their market to be upgraded ASAP. There are a pile of larger markets than Long Island that have not been announced yet. At this point, the markets that are announced will be complete within months of each other.

 

sums it up pretty much....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

U think the high income ppl use sprint?....

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

 

Actually, considering Sprint has the highest ARPU, and, proportionately to the number of subscribers, one of the highest ratios of smartphones vs. feature phones, I would not necessarily say their subscribers are low income. Also, just because Sprint's plans are a better value, is not an indicator of customer social class. There's a mix, just like with any other carrier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, considering Sprint has the highest ARPU, and, proportionately to the number of subscribers, one of the highest ratios of smartphones vs. feature phones, I would not necessarily say their subscribers are low income. Also, just because Sprint's plans are a better value, is not an indicator of customer social class. There's a mix, just like with any other carrier.

 

Actually US Cellular has the highest ARPU, followed by Verizon wireless and then Sprint. http://www.phonearena.com/news/US-carrier-landscape-in-Q3-Verizon-records-biggest-ARPU_id23755

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually US Cellular has the highest ARPU, followed by Verizon wireless and then Sprint. http://s4gru.com/ind...de-websites-r26

 

Interesting, I thought I read an article on Phone Arena or Android Central that showed Sprint as having highest ARPU. THanks for the clarification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, I thought I read an article on Phone Arena or Android Central that showed Sprint as having highest ARPU. THanks for the clarification.

 

I posted the wrong link initially. Sorry. Fixed it now. I still had an old link on the clipboard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, considering Sprint has the highest ARPU, and, proportionately to the number of subscribers, one of the highest ratios of smartphones vs. feature phones, I would not necessarily say their subscribers are low income. Also, just because Sprint's plans are a better value, is not an indicator of customer social class. There's a mix, just like with any other carrier.

 

I'd dispute that its a better value.

 

Data service has been brutal for the past month and a half.

 

I've been averaging .15 down and .09 up. if I can even run speedtests during the daytime.

 

Then you get on the phone and they deny there are any issues with the towers in the local area, even though its basically unusable.

Edited by RoccoM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'd dispute that its a better value.

 

Data service has been brutal for the past month and a half.

 

I've been averaging .15 down and .09 up. if I can even run speedtests during the daytime.

 

Then you get on the phone and they deny there are any issues with the towers in the local area' date=' even though its basically unusable.[/quote']

 

I'm sure you mean for you its not a better value. There are lots of places where the Sprint EVDO network is total FAIL. And in these places that would weigh heavily against the concept of value. But there are places that the Sprint network performs acceptably. And to many people in these areas Sprint would still be a value.

 

Robert

 

Posted via Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure you mean for you its not a better value. There are lots of places where the Sprint EVDO network is total FAIL. And in these places that would weigh heavily against the concept of value. But there are places that the Sprint network performs acceptably. And to many people in these areas Sprint would still be a value.

 

Robert

 

Posted via Forum Runner

 

Turns out recent connectivity issues (15 towers are down in the area for UPGRADES) but the customer service reps couldn't just come out and tell me that.

 

One of them wanted me to wipe my phone while I was at work and do a full restore, and even got belligerent with me because I couldn't. I wasn't at home near my laptop, itunes, contacts etc. And not near wifi so I couldnt backup to iCloud.

 

Really ridiculous that I had to escalate it three times over three days to get a real answer.

 

All they had to say was tower work with an ETA of being finished on 3/17.

Edited by RoccoM
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • SoftBank isn't willing to do anything with Sprint. Sprint will need a different buyer. I do agree with getting Dishes spectrum. They have Nationwide AWS at 20x20 and my area the have 10x10 600. Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
    • I do think that the merger will be approved but just in case, here's my thoughts on what should happen if it gets rejected in order of preferred outcome: 1. T-Mobile & Sprint merge their network operations into an independent company and they both become MVNOs. Dish is left out in the cold with their spectrum unused. FCC has egg in their face. Only way Dish gets their network deployed is if Amazon and/or cable cos invest in them. it could happen...the other possibility is that Dish sells their spectrum to Verizon/AT&T/T-mobile. Sprint does pretty good but they are no longer a price leader. Their pricing is rationalized and pretty close to what the other major carriers charge. 2. Sprint gets properly funded by Softbank. They buy Dish's 600Mhz/ AWS-3. They fill out their present network but do not expand beyond their current footprint. They charge for rural roaming and they price themselves rationally. They grow slowly. 3. Sprint gets acquired by a consortium of Amazon and cable cos. They use Sprint to promote their video offerings to millennials. The resulting company expands their network to provide a really solid network in the boondocks but fall short of Verizon/AT&T which is OK. They only expand where they can make money.  4. Sprint goes on without the financial support of Softbank and limps along. They shrink their network and become an urban based network. Some smaller markets and places where it does not make financial sense to have their network are dropped. They rationalize their prices and charge for roaming. Where they do offer service their network is really solid. 
    • Thanks.    I thought the same about the appeal, but knowing this crowd... they might.  
    • You aren't kidding, I frequent Flat Stick in downtown a lot and other than right by the door, there is ZERO service. Additionally, up the hill to the north into Norkirk by Kirkland Jr. High and onto the Forbes Creek area are pretty much total dead zones. The only major ones I have encountered which aren't covered by any roaming either.   Edit: It looks like they are getting started on the 11250 Kirkland Way site as well:   https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/ENR20-00296/Kirkland   Edit 2: I just noticed that Clearwire/Sprint used to have a tower up by Kirkland Jr high. That tower would have definitely improved service to that area if they had converted to triband. As stated, that region is BY FAR the biggest dead zone in the area. 
    • That is actually the permit to do the physical upgrade.  The original planning permit was filed in 2018 and was finally approved this month.  Here is the link: https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/WIR18-00056/Kirkland. Hopefully they will get that site upgraded soon.  That area could really use a coverage boost.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...