Jump to content

Current Sprint PRLs


halcyoncmdr

Recommended Posts

EVDO roaming may have been shut off, but as AJ says, 1xRTT is either on, or off. There is no data switch in the PRL for 1xRTT. Your Verizon hotspot is likely running on EVDO. 1xRTT is extremely slow to begin with, and any amount of traffic will cut into available speeds (think Kbps as the top speed).

No what I'm saying is that when I roam on Verizon EVDO on my sprint phone it doesn't load anything but it works fine on my Verizon MiFi. It's perplexed me - I can't seem to come up with a good explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No what I'm saying is that when I roam on Verizon EVDO on my sprint phone it doesn't load anything but it works fine on my Verizon MiFi. It's perplexed me - I can't seem to come up with a good explanation.

 

Then Verizon is not authenticating your device. If it's even an area that allows EVDO roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RAvirani, on 04 Apr 2016 - 5:15 PM, said:snapback.png

 

A PRL update seems to have caused the problem so it is only natural thinking that another PRL update will fix it. I have experienced the same thing ever since I got PRL 55051 and no, it is not that Verizon's CDMA network has become decrepit in my area for my Verizon hotspot works fine on CDMA. I don't really know what the problem is but it sure seems like it was that 55051 PRL update.

 It started with PRL 55051 as you say. 

Whether it was caused by the PRL 55051 update or merely coincidental timing, right after my phone updated to PRL 55051 I lost all roaming (voice/text/data) on I-35 north of Mason City, IA to around the first rest area in MN and in the "I-90 gap" in Sprint service between Austin and the Rochester turnoff.  After a call to Sprint customer service eventually voice/text roaming came back, then later on 1x data, so I suspect authentication issues.  Also note that according to Sprint's coverage map I-35 north of Mason City is supposed to have native Sprint EVDO all the way to the Minnesota border but my phone has always switched to roaming or no service by time I pass by the Diamond Jo casino (Exit 214).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does PRL 55052 take away EVDO roaming from USCC sites? The "3G & More" coverage map has been updated again and there's no longer 3G extended coverage shown in Nebraska,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does PRL 55052 take away EVDO roaming from USCC sites? The "3G & More" coverage map has been updated again and there's no longer 3G extended coverage shown in Nebraska,

 

USCC was EVDO roaming, but it counted as off network usage. It was never considered "Roaming+" or "Extended." The 3G & More map correctly shows USCC coverage as off network roaming. You'll just get EVDO in that area, whereas in many Verizon roaming areas you'll still be on 1x.

 

USCC LTE roaming still shows, but that's a different map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC was EVDO roaming, but it counted as off network usage. It was never considered "Roaming+" or "Extended." The 3G & More map correctly shows USCC coverage as off network roaming. You'll just get EVDO in that area, whereas in many Verizon roaming areas you'll still be on 1x.

 

USCC LTE roaming still shows, but that's a different map.

I wish I'd saved a screenshot of the previous version of the "3G & More map.  I thought it was strange that USCC EVDO showed as Roaming+ (pseudonative) but USCC LTE was roaming -- this would allow people to put their phones in CDMA mode and avoid the roaming data cap, albeit with slower speeds.

 

This page indicates "Off Network Roaming" is all 1x: http://shop2.sprint.com/en/stores/popups/compare_data_speeds_popup.shtml

 

There isn't a category listed for EVDO non-Extended roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I'd saved a screenshot of the previous version of the "3G & More map.  I thought it was strange that USCC EVDO showed as Roaming+ (pseudonative) but USCC LTE was roaming -- this would allow people to put their phones in CDMA mode and avoid the roaming data cap, albeit with slower speeds.

 

This page indicates "Off Network Roaming" is all 1x: http://shop2.sprint.com/en/stores/popups/compare_data_speeds_popup.shtml

 

There isn't a category listed for EVDO non-Extended roaming.

 

USCC didn't actually show as "Roaming+". The colors were really similar, so it would be easy to confuse, but it was actually shown as 3G Roaming vs. "Nationwide" roaming. I'll see if I have a screenshot.

 

Edit: Here's the screenshot.

 

2015-09-14_1-32-28_2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC didn't actually show as "Roaming+". The colors were really similar, so it would be easy to confuse, but it was actually shown as 3G Roaming vs. "Nationwide" roaming. I'll see if I have a screenshot.

 

Edit: Here's the screenshot.

 

2015-09-14_1-32-28_2.png

 Thanks, I still wonder if PRL 55052 removes EVDO roaming since the current coverage map no longer shows it and it's not listed on the speeds chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone had a chance to look through PRLs 55052 and 54052 to see what's changed yet?

Afaik, no because no one has uploaded a copy of the changed PRL yet. Guess I'll do it this evening if no one else has by then....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I was going to try to look at it at work this morning, but the software I normally use isn't working.  I'll have to try it at home (slower, but should function in any case).

 

EDIT:  Right after posting, I figured out what was wrong.  Will have something shortly.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the changes I see:

 

In Geo 3, the preferred roaming partners are now SIDs 6498, 21625, and 6499, with EV-DO.  (6498 is United Wireless, 6499 is Nex-Tech Wireless.  21625 isn't in the list I have.)

 

In Geo 4, Sprint native service now includes SIDs 4166 and 22424, the roaming priority of 4305 was increased, and 1211/1465/6488/152 were added.  (See Geo 9 below.)

 

In Geo 5, 1382 and 1996 were added as preferred roaming partners.  (C-Spire.)

 

In Geo 6, 4305 was increased, but also added to roaming are 264/1394/2094/113.  2094 comes with EV-DO.  (113 is Verizon, 264/1394 is C-Spire, 2094 is not in my list.  4305 is SI Wireless.)

 

In Geo 7, 4305 was increased, but 1280/6490/6492 were added.  All three come with EV-DO.  (All three are Bluegrass Cellular.)

 

Geo 9 is now gone, having been merged into Geo 4.  5911 is the only roaming SID not to make the jump.  The other geos are renumbered accordingly.  (5911 is US Cellular.)

 

In the former Geo 12, now Geo 11, 193 and 318 are added.  (US Cellular and Alltel, accordingly.)

 

In the former Geo 14, now Geo 13, 4305 was increased.

 

- Trip

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the changes I see:

 

In Geo 3, the preferred roaming partners are now SIDs 6498, 21625, and 6499, with EV-DO.  (6498 is United Wireless, 6499 is Nex-Tech Wireless.  21625 isn't in the list I have.)

 

In Geo 4, Sprint native service now includes SIDs 4166 and 22424, the roaming priority of 4305 was increased, and 1211/1465/6488/152 were added.  (See Geo 9 below.)

 

In Geo 5, 1382 and 1996 were added as preferred roaming partners.  (C-Spire.)

 

In Geo 6, 4305 was increased, but also added to roaming are 264/1394/2094/113.  2094 comes with EV-DO.  (113 is Verizon, 264/1394 is C-Spire, 2094 is not in my list.  4305 is SI Wireless.)

 

In Geo 7, 4305 was increased, but 1280/6490/6492 were added.  All three come with EV-DO.  (All three are Bluegrass Cellular.)

 

Geo 9 is now gone, having been merged into Geo 4.  5911 is the only roaming SID not to make the jump.  The other geos are renumbered accordingly.  (5911 is US Cellular.)

 

In the former Geo 12, now Geo 11, 193 and 318 are added.  (US Cellular and Alltel, accordingly.)

 

In the former Geo 14, now Geo 13, 4305 was increased.

 

- Trip

 

thanks for the great work.

 

sorry for the dumb question, but how do you know geo your market is in?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the changes I see:

 

In Geo 3, the preferred roaming partners are now SIDs 6498, 21625, and 6499, with EV-DO.  (6498 is United Wireless, 6499 is Nex-Tech Wireless.  21625 isn't in the list I have.)

 

In Geo 4, Sprint native service now includes SIDs 4166 and 22424, the roaming priority of 4305 was increased, and 1211/1465/6488/152 were added.  (See Geo 9 below.)

 

In Geo 5, 1382 and 1996 were added as preferred roaming partners.  (C-Spire.)

 

In Geo 6, 4305 was increased, but also added to roaming are 264/1394/2094/113.  2094 comes with EV-DO.  (113 is Verizon, 264/1394 is C-Spire, 2094 is not in my list.  4305 is SI Wireless.)

 

In Geo 7, 4305 was increased, but 1280/6490/6492 were added.  All three come with EV-DO.  (All three are Bluegrass Cellular.)

 

Geo 9 is now gone, having been merged into Geo 4.  5911 is the only roaming SID not to make the jump.  The other geos are renumbered accordingly.  (5911 is US Cellular.)

 

In the former Geo 12, now Geo 11, 193 and 318 are added.  (US Cellular and Alltel, accordingly.)

 

In the former Geo 14, now Geo 13, 4305 was increased.

 

- Trip

Is this from PRL 55052 or PRL 54052? I've noticed one of my friends with an andriod got 55052 while it seems that iPhone users received 54052...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55052. From the file provided by UPdownLoAD.

 

- Trip

I don't think there's a way for me to get 54052 off my iPhone...did any one else get 54052 that would be so kind as to upload it so we could figure out the differences?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the great work.

 

sorry for the dumb question, but how do you know geo your market is in?

This is the best I can find. http://prl.digiblur.com/Sprint_55021.txt

Take note that there is some changes since that PRL from 11/10/2014

 

If I search for "4120"(1X 1900) or "22407"(1X 800) (SIDs for DFW and East Texas) I find it is in geo 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...