Jump to content
Rawvega

Verizon eyeing wireless business in Canada: Report

Recommended Posts

 

(Reuters) - Verizon Communications Inc is looking to enter Canada's cellular telephone business, potentially fulfilling the government's hopes of having a fourth major wireless company, the Globe and Mail reported on Monday.

 

Verizon could look at taking over a smaller player in Canada, such as Wind Mobile, and participating in a new wireless spectrum auction, the newspaper reported citing two industry sources familiar with the situation. (http://link.reuters.com/zas88t)

 

New entrants such as Wind, Mobilicity and Public Mobile have helped to drive down wireless prices in Canada, but have struggled to turn a profit.

 

The struggles of the new entrants have frustrated the Canadian government's hopes of having a fourth major wireless company in all parts of the country to compete with Telus Corp, BCE Inc's Bell unit and Rogers Communications.

 

AT&T Corp, Vodafone Group Plc and Telenor ASA could be other possible investors, the newspaper said.

 

(Reporting By Vijay Vishwas in Bangalore; Editing by Sreejiraj Eluvangal)

 

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/verizon-eyeing-wireless-business-canada-114557556.html

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard for me to imagine Verizon as a carrier who spurs competition.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right.....  

 

 

I suppose they could offer cheap US roaming rates to the Canadian carriers to leverage attractive roaming rates for their customers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Canadian market is small potatoes. I find it difficult to believe that VZW would be interested, especially as it would be competing against Bell/Telus and Rogers -- the Canadian versions of itself and AT&T. VZW wants to be the big dog or stay home.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We sure this isn't Vodafone? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We sure this isn't Vodafone? :lol:

As bad as Vodafone did in Japan we don't want them in Canada either, and frankly, I wish they would buy out Verizon's stake in VZW and run it into the ground so Verizon Wireless would die.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it looks like Verizon's going to Canada but why?

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/canadas-new-spectrum-transfer-rules-could-open-door-verizon/2013-07-01

 

 

Well it might be because Canadians pay the highest rates in the world

 

http://www.iphoneincanada.ca/news/canadas-cell-phone-rates-the-highest-in-the-world/

 

When most competitors enter a market, they make a splash by undercutting the incumbents but for some reason, I don't think Verizon's gonna do that.

 

The Canadian government wants a 4th national competitor to drive down prices but I don't think Verizon is a good candidate for the role.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a mission for SoftBank.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pretty sure i read a thread on here last month about the same thing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thread closed - to be merged soon.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't the Canadian carriers that used to have CDMA networks (that were compatible with VZW and Sprint) all in the process of converting to using W-CDMA for voice? If that is true, I can understand why Verizon is interested in entering the Canadian market.

1. To perserve roaming for US CDMA customers in Canada (and most of them are currently Verizon's customers).

2. If all the Canadian carriers go to W-CDMA/GSM, then Verizon isn't going to be getting any roaming revenue from those customers anymore. 
3. They may be able to enter the market cheeply by buying up existing infrastructure from carriers that are/were using CDMA but are converting to W-CDMA/GSM.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not used to, those CDMA networks are still there. Moreover, the CDMA networks have more coverage than the new W-CDMA networks that are being overlaid.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not used to, those CDMA networks are still there. Moreover, the CDMA networks have more coverage than the new W-CDMA networks that are being overlaid.

 

Bingo!  You saved me a lengthy explanation.  Thanks, Rawvega.

 

To add to that, neither Bell nor Telus has deployed any GSM, only W-CDMA.

 

AJ

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bingo!  You saved me a lengthy explanation.  Thanks, Rawvega.

 

To add to that, neither Bell nor Telus has deployed any GSM, only W-CDMA.

 

AJ

 

Yes, but if they're buying Wind, they're getting a pure WCDMA network that needs to be upgraded to LTE and will probably need 700Mhz in the upcoming auction to be competitive with the big three. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, Mexico, Argentina and Brazil would be much bigger prizes. NII maybe up for sale. Is Softbank interested?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but if they're buying Wind, they're getting a pure WCDMA network that needs to be upgraded to LTE and will probably need 700Mhz in the upcoming auction to be competitive with the big three. 

 

The issue that I was responding to was not about Wind; it was about Bell and Telus.  Too many people think that Bell and Telus have switched to W-CDMA.  No, they rolled out some W-CDMA overlay for three reasons:

  1. They had spectrum to burn.
  2. They wanted the iPhone.
  3. They wanted roaming revenue from the Vancouver Winter Olympics.

Other than excess spectrum, which is a constant "problem" for Bell, Telus, and Rogers, the other two reasons are now ancient history.  Furthermore, their CDMA2000 networks are still in place -- in fact, I roamed on Telus two months ago -- and they still offer greater coverage area than the W-CDMA overlays.

 

AJ

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Not used to, those CDMA networks are still there. Moreover, the CDMA networks have more coverage than the new W-CDMA networks that are being overlaid.

 

 

Bingo! You saved me a lengthy explanation. Thanks, Rawvega.

 

To add to that, neither Bell nor Telus has deployed any GSM, only W-CDMA.

 

AJ

Plus, from everything I've read, Bell and Telus have no plans to discontinue their CDMA networks because of the roaming revenue they bring in from US CDMA roaming customers. All they see is '$$$$$'.

 

If Verizon does enter the Canadian market, it's because they want to cheat the Big 2 in Canada of their roaming revenue, and enhance their own pocket books in the process. A purchase of Wind Mobile will put them in line to upgrade Wind's AWS to LTE and once Verizon sets up VoLTE, their customers would be on AWS just like in the US.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus, from everything I've read, Bell and Telus have no plans to discontinue their CDMA networks because of the roaming revenue they bring in from US CDMA roaming customers. All they see is '$$$$$'.

 

If Verizon does enter the Canadian market, it's because they want to cheat the Big 2 in Canada of their roaming revenue, and enhance their own pocket books in the process. A purchase of Wind Mobile will put them in line to upgrade Wind's AWS to LTE and once Verizon sets up VoLTE, their customers would be on AWS just like in the US.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

I don't think Verizon is eager to build another CDMA network when they're trying to shut it down in the US. How could they justify charging roaming to their American customers who "roam" onto the Verizon network in Canadia? I'm sure that Verizon-US customers are the biggest $$$ for roaming onto Canada.

 

The Canadian 700 MHz auction is coming up very soon

 

http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20130604/spectrum_auction/canada-looks-infuse-competition-mobile-space-delays-700-mhz-auction/#_

 

Don't expect Band 12 to get very high bids.

 

I think Verizon is gonna buy Band 13 spectrum in Canada and create an all-LTE network just like they want to here. Their Canadian phones will have CDMA for roaming down south courtesy of Qualcomm.

Also, the Tier 2 carriers they're buying don't even have any 850 MHz spectrum, right? 

It's Mobilicity, Wind Mobile, Public Mobile

These carriers were created after Canada's AWS auction.

That's who Verizon would be buying so they couldn't create a new CDMA network if they wanted.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turns out there's a reason why Canadians pay so much: besides China, they're the only country that doesn't allow foreign direct investment.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2011/11/17/f-naguib-sawiris.html

 

So the Canadian government's public declarations that they want a fourth national competitor is just BS.

Cause they'd change their investment rules if that were the case.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Plus, from everything I've read, Bell and Telus have no plans to discontinue their CDMA networks because of the roaming revenue they bring in from US CDMA roaming customers. All they see is '$$$$$'.

 

 

If Verizon does enter the Canadian market, it's because they want to cheat the Big 2 in Canada of their roaming revenue, and enhance their own pocket books in the process. A purchase of Wind Mobile will put them in line to upgrade Wind's AWS to LTE and once Verizon sets up VoLTE, their customers would be on AWS just like in the US.

 

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

I don't think Verizon is eager to build another CDMA network when they're trying to shut it down in the US. How could they justify charging roaming to their American customers who "roam" onto the Verizon network in Canadia? I'm sure that Verizon-US customers are the biggest $$$ for roaming onto Canada.

 

I think they're gonna buy Band 13 spectrum in Canada and create an all-LTE network just like they want to here. Their Canadian phones will have CDMA for roaming down south.

Also, the Tier 2 carriers they're buying don't even have 850 MHz spectrum, right?

It's Mobilicity, Wind Mobile, Public Mobile

 

Turns out there's a reason why Canadians pay so much: besides China, they're the only country that doesn't allow foreign direct investment.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2011/11/17/f-naguib-sawiris.html

 

So the Canadian government's public declarations that they want a fourth national competitor is just BS.

Cause they'd change their investment rules if that were the case.

 

First, in terms of foreign direct investment, Wind Mobile is a result of an Egyptian foreign direct investment, which took quite a while to secure. 2nd, I didn't say they would start another CDMA network there, they would use the AWS holdings that Wind has and upgrade it to LTE and when most of their US customers are on VoLTE, then they can gouge their US customers for roaming and pay it back to themselves.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't the Canadian carriers that used to have CDMA networks (that were compatible with VZW and Sprint) all in the process of converting to using W-CDMA for voice? If that is true, I can understand why Verizon is interested in entering the Canadian market.

 

1. To perserve roaming for US CDMA customers in Canada (and most of them are currently Verizon's customers).

2. If all the Canadian carriers go to W-CDMA/GSM, then Verizon isn't going to be getting any roaming revenue from those customers anymore. 

3. They may be able to enter the market cheeply by buying up existing infrastructure from carriers that are/were using CDMA but are converting to W-CDMA/GSM.

 

 

 

1. That implies that Verizon is spending billions in Canada so its own customers will stay on a technology that it wants them to get off. If anything, Verizon is happy that CDMA is dying in Canada so those customers buy a Qualcomm LTE/W-CDMA phone.

 

2. Yes. So what? That's the justification for them spending billions in Canada? 

 

3. The only carriers Verizon is buying are the 3 startups that were created after Canada's AWS auction.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/reports-verizon-makes-600m-800m-bid-canadas-wind-mobile/2013-06-26

 

Wind Mobile, Mobilicity, Public Mobile

 

Look at their coverage maps: they only have enclaves of native coverage - and only on AWS - in one or two metro areas each and the rest is roaming; there is no infrastructure to speak of and it's ALL only AWS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First, in terms of foreign direct investment, Wind Mobile is a result of an Egyptian foreign direct investment, which took quite a while to secure. 2nd, I didn't say they would start another CDMA network there, they would use the AWS holdings that Wind has and upgrade it to LTE and when most of their US customers are on VoLTE, then they can gouge their US customers for roaming and pay it back to themselves.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

You didn't read the article:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2011/11/17/f-naguib-sawiris.html

 

"Globalive, headed by Canadian entrepreneur Anthony Lacavera, has a complex ownership structure under which the Canadian equity owners control the company, but Orascom put up more than 80 per cent of the funding.

That raised the ire of telecom incumbents Rogers Communications Inc., BCE Inc. and Telus Corp. which complained to the CRTC that the company doesn't adhere to Canada's stringent foreign ownership rules.

After a lengthy process, Canadian officials eventually ruled that Wind was within the rules and was allowed to launch a cellular service in late 2009."

 

By the skin of their teeth it was ruled ok; that's not how it should be.

We have Tmobile and now Softbank. WTF are the Canadians worried about?

It's one thing to have issues with Huawei and ZTE's routers but when it's Verizon?

 

VoLTE: I'm sure you've read the mods' many posts regarding VoLTE in its current state. Simply, it's not as robust in terms of coverage at 700 MHz, let alone at AWS, compared to even W-CDMA voice.

As the mods said, maybe LTE R12 will fix that but that'll be a while. And this is even more relevant for Verizon who has very far spacing on their LTE towers. Don't think that VZW will make their towers denser in Canada when their low population density will already require a huge investment.

 

And marketing-wise, how can Verizon justify charging their US customers roaming on the Verizon-Canada network? They can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

First, in terms of foreign direct investment, Wind Mobile is a result of an Egyptian foreign direct investment, which took quite a while to secure. 2nd, I didn't say they would start another CDMA network there, they would use the AWS holdings that Wind has and upgrade it to LTE and when most of their US customers are on VoLTE, then they can gouge their US customers for roaming and pay it back to themselves.

 

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

You didn't read the article:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2011/11/17/f-naguib-sawiris.html

 

"Globalive, headed by Canadian entrepreneur Anthony Lacavera, has a complex ownership structure under which the Canadian equity owners control the company, but Orascom put up more than 80 per cent of the funding.

That raised the ire of telecom incumbents Rogers Communications Inc., BCE Inc. and Telus Corp. which complained to the CRTC that the company doesn't adhere to Canada's stringent foreign ownership rules.

After a lengthy process, Canadian officials eventually ruled that Wind was within the rules and was allowed to launch a cellular service in late 2009."

 

By the skin of their teeth it was ruled ok; that's not how it should be.

We have Tmobile and now Softbank. WTF are the Canadians worried about?

It's one thing to have issues with Huawei and ZTE's routers but when it's Verizon?

 

VoLTE: I'm sure you've read the mods' many posts regarding VoLTE in its current state. Simply, it's not as robust in terms of coverage at 700 MHz, let alone at AWS, compared to even W-CDMA voice.

As the mods said, maybe LTE R12 will fix that but that'll be a while. And this is even more relevant for Verizon who has very far spacing on their LTE towers. Don't think that VZW will make their towers denser in Canada when their low population density will already require a huge investment.

 

And marketing-wise, how can Verizon justify charging their US customers roaming on the Verizon-Canada network? They can't.

 

That article was wrote 2 years ago. Here's the kicker: an article wrote earlier this year said that Canada's telecom authority has relaxed their rules more than when they let Wind Mobile start up. If I remember to this evening, I will try to find it. They want a major 4th player, but frankly, Verizon shouldn't be it.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By Paynefanbro
      I figured since Verizon's 5G-NR network officially launched it would make sense for there to be a thread for it.
    • By legion125
      by Jeff Foster
      Sprint 4G Rollout Updates
      Friday, April 20, 2012 - 11:31 AM MDT
       
      Is there a "spectrum shortage?" Those two words send shivers down the spines of wireless industry executives. New services demand ever more spectrum, and, the story goes, there simply isn't enough spectrum available. An Internet search engine will easily find hundreds of thousands of links to the term "spectrum shortage." Many claim that it will be the downfall of America.
      The dwindling availability of a finite resource that can't be seen or touched threatens to possibly disrupt the mobile lifestyle that virtually every American has embraced. Dropped cellphone calls, delayed text messages and choppy video streams could become more frequent occurrences because the airwaves on which that data travel are nearing capacity at a time when mobile usage shows no signs of slowing.
      Federal regulators and industry players are searching for ways to fend off the supply-and-demand collision. Dish Network recently acquired a large block of vacant wireless spectrum that pending regulatory approval could be used for mobile broadband services.
       
      Short-Term Plan

      AT&T tried to merge with T-Mobile to solve its own capacity problem. It wanted to get its hands on T-Mobile spectrum. Still, that would have been only a temporary fix at best. Remember all the terrible stories about the quality of AT&T's wireless data network over the last few years? They say they simply don't have enough.
      The reason is that during the last few years, smartphones like the Apple iPhone and the many devices running Android emerged, and wireless data traffic grew like crazy. This problem jumped up and bit AT&T in the rear end. Suddenly, so many people were sucking so much data that the network could not handle it, due to spectrum shortage. Spectrum is like the size of the hose, and a wider hose is needed to carry more data for more customers.
      A couple good things are suddenly happening that may give carriers a little time to solve this increasing problem. Perhaps Verizon starting to sell the iPhone last spring has something to do with it. If so, then now with Sprint selling the iPhone, AT&T will have more breathing room, at least temporarily. That's the good news. However, that reprieve will only last a short while before the exploding smartphone and wireless data growth catches up. Then the other carriers will be faced with the same problem that's confronting AT&T.
      In the first quarter of 2011, the amount of data the average smartphone user consumed each month grew by 89 percent to 435 megabytes from 230 MB during the same quarter in 2010, according to Nielsen research. That's up from about 90 MB in 2009. For reference, the average size of an MP3 music file is about 4 MB.
      "Texting has always been traditionally viewed as a lightweight consumer of bandwidth, but if I start adding videos and pictures to my texts, that also starts consuming more bandwidth," said Tom Cullen, an executive vice president with Dish. But the primary growth driver will be video. Consumers can go through 5 gigabytes a month simply by streaming 10 minutes of standard definition video daily, he said.
       
      Data use is skyrocketing
      Data from the FCC indicate that more Americans are looking at their phones rather than talking on them. In 2009, 67 percent of available spectrum was utilized for voice and 33 percent for Internet data. Those percentages are now at 75 percent for data and 25 percent for voice. With each new iPhone release, data consumption grows. The iPhone 4S eats up twice as much data as the iPhone 4 and three times as much as the iPhone 3G, according to a study by network services firm Arieso. The new iPhone features Siri, a bandwidth-heavy voice recognition feature.
      The FCC estimates the U.S. will face a spectrum deficit of 90 MHz in 2013 and 275 MHz in 2014. To address the crunch, the federal government hopes to unleash 500 MHz of spectrum currently used for other purposes for wireless broadband by 2020. To put that figure in perspective, there is currently 547 MHz of spectrum allocated for mobile services, and AT&T and Verizon each own about 90 MHz.
      The government plans to hold so-called incentive auctions, which will try to lure spectrum owners such as TV broadcasters to sell their licenses. Verizon Wireless has agreed to purchase spectrum from a group of cable-TV companies. Sprint has expressed interest in working with Dish, which acquired the bulk of its 45 MHz of spectrum through two deals for bankrupt satellite technology companies. Dish chairman Charlie Ergen has said that the satellite-TV provider would prefer to partner with an existing wireless carrier on a high speed, 4G network. In response to recent comments by Sprint Chief Financial Officer Joe Euteneuer about the company's interest in working with Dish, Cullen said other wireless carriers are in the same situation. After failing to acquire T-Mobile, analysts expect AT&T to make a play for Dish, a long-rumored merger partner.
      As for T-Mobile, perhaps the most logical buyer is CenturyLink. T-Mobile's German-based parent company has indicated that it might exit the U.S. market. CenturyLink, which acquired Denver-based Qwest last year, is the third-largest landline phone company but does not own a wireless service, unlike the top two, AT&T and Verizon.
      Carriers are trying to offload as much traffic as they can to Wi-Fi networks, which ride on unlicensed spectrum. In some areas, they're installing picocells, which are smaller cell sites that can help boost capacity in dense areas.
      Finally, they're spending billions of dollars on LTE networks that use the airwaves more efficiently. Verizon and AT&T already have 4G LTE networks in place, and Sprint is moving to the technology. Dish says it hopes to enter the mobile broadband market with advanced LTE technology by late 2014 or early 2015. If Dish were to also offer voice service, it would come through VoLTE, which is similar to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VOIP) phone services. Dish still needs the FCC to drop a condition tied to its spectrum that requires devices to have the ability to communicate with satellites, not just ground-based cell sites. The rule-making process that will likely remove the requirement is underway and could be completed by summer's end.
       
      Is there really a shortage problem?
      The problem, analysts argue, is that the operators that control the greatest amount of unused spectrum may be under-capitalized or unwilling to build out networks to use the spectrum. "We do not believe the U.S. faces a spectrum shortage," Jason Bazinet and Michael Rollins wrote in their Citigroup report. "Too much spectrum is controlled by companies that are not planning on rolling out services or face business and financial challenges. And of the spectrum that is being used, 90 percent of it has been allocated to existing 2G, 3G, and 3.5G wireless services by larger wireless carriers, such as AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel, and T-Mobile USA.
      In total, U.S. operators have licenses for about 538MHz of wireless spectrum. Only about 192MHz of that spectrum is currently being used. Most of the unused wireless spectrum is owned by companies such as Clearwire, LightSquared, and Dish Network. But so far, LightSquared has been stopped and the other companies have been slow to build networks using their available spectrum.
      "There is definitely a mismatch when it comes to spectrum in the wireless industry," said Paul Gallant, an analyst with MF Global in Washington, D.C. "There are some companies that have spectrum, but they're struggling financially. Or they aren't quite sure what to do with the spectrum. And others that have the money and business model, but need the spectrum." The move to 4G is very important for these operators because it offers them a more efficient way to deliver service. 4G LTE uses the available spectrum roughly 700 percent more efficiently than the 3G wireless technology EV-DO. Carriers will soon be refarming 3G spectrum to 4G LTE in several years.
      A key factor in encouraging efficient use of spectrum has been largely overlooked in carrier boardroom discussions. Wireless providers can add capacity, without obtaining more spectrum, by adding more and more cell sites. Additional cell sites in spectrum constrained areas allow the same spectrum to be used by even more consumers, as well as adding picocells and microcells to denser population areas. So far, the carriers have not expressed too much interest in this method due to additional capital expenditures and overhead. Their strategy is like what Microsoft, Apple and Google have used. It's just cheaper to buy what you need than to invest the time and energy to do the actual work.
      So what can the wireless companies do? To some extent, re-farming their existing networks will help. But so will finding ways to use other spectrum. For example, only T-Mobile lets users make phone calls using Wi-Fi, yet most of the mobile devices available from carriers have this capability; the carriers just don't enable it.
      Allowing Wi-Fi calling could unload millions of voice and data users on to alternative networks and ease the spectrum crunch, at least to some extent. Encouraging VoIP use would also help for two reasons. VoIP doesn't require a lot of bandwidth, and it means that the phone in question uses only the data spectrum, not both voice and data while this is going on.
      These points illustrate that the carriers do have options beyond just buying up spectrum. They can offload more wireless traffic than they do now, build more cell sites into their networks and they can allow the use of other types of communications. While the spectrum crunch isn't going away, that doesn't mean that the process can't be slowed.
       
      Sensational graphic extolling the dire spectrum crisis. Maybe a tad exaggerated???
       
       
      Images courtesy: Spectrum Bridge, iqmetrix.com
       
      Source: FierceWireless.com, Denver Post, Ecommercetimes.com, CNET
    • By runagun
      Unless this is a mistake. Mobilitie is also helping VZW on there small cell approach too. I'm familiar with them doing arenas with all the providers , just not small cell.
       
      http://www.downers.us/public/docs/agendas/2017/11-14-17/RES 2017-7580 - Right-of-Way License Agreement with Mobilitie, LLC - 11-14-2017_8260.pdf
    • By Andrew Revering
      This one has stumped me and I'm hoping someone can shed light on this...
       
      I have Sprint as my provider, and I'm out in a no-coverage area north of Lake Superior in Minnesota.
       
      I purchased a 20db gain Yagi antenna, and pointed it at the nearest tower, which is 16 miles away on the other side of a high bluff.
       
      The antenna is connected to a Wilson (WeBoost) amplifier
      Amplifier showing all green as it's at max power and working properly.
       
      I am getting a signal! It's a middle of the road "2-3 bar" -87 dBm signal on both my Android HTC 10 and my wife's iPhone 6S Plus
       
      Signal Check Pro says it's the Verizon tower, which makes sense as I'm pointing it at the 850 mhz Verizon tower.
       
      The problem is that calls do not work. No tones or audio when dialing and eventually it just disconnects, and no data connection available.
       
      I tried a Verizon MiFi and had similar results. It had a signal but couldn't connect.
       
      What's the problem? I've put in about $800 into this setup, and I don't want to give up on getting data and switching to Satellite if I'm very close to getting a connection!
       
      Thanks in advance for your ideas/explanations.
    • By sbolen
      Daring Fireball linked to a really great piece in the New York Times over the weekend about how U.S. Consumers “may overpay by over a quarter of a trillion dollars for worse levels of service than customers in other countries receive.”
       
  • Posts

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...