Jump to content

Comments related to the NV Running List Thread


Recommended Posts

I just saw a new doc that includes Oklahoma. I hope to able to discuss it soon. Need further corroboration.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

 

and...... There goes all hope of being in the 2.5 round.

 

Sprint must really trying to incentivize us to move to another carrier. If it weren't for the family plan I'm locked into I might just move to straight talk (t-mo edition) with an HTC Amaze or an SGSII to get my HSPA+42 on at true unlimited (the t-mo version at least, no throttling huzzah!).

 

ugh,,,,,, cellular depression, sorry if it appears that I blame S4GRU, I don't. I just want to vent and this is the only place people can understand the frustration. The Sprint community forum just gives me the company line. This place actually can explain and move past that. Thanks

 

Lord knows I'll never leave Sprint, although I wish I could.

 

/crack open beer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I throw out a glimmer of hope for Oklahoma and you become despondant. Interesting...

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything seems to be on track. I bet Sprint will have something more official to say on Wednesday.

I doubt it. Sprint wouldn't want to side-track the HTC train for that day. If anything they may say stuff about the network at another event like CTIA or any other event.

 

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't really see them passing up a chance to start talking about LTE and what strides they have made. People need to know the network is going to get better. We take a lot of the info get gain from sites like this for granted. The average joe only knows what Sprint tells him or he/she sees from their phone. If I didn't know about NV I would have split from them by now. Great pricing and unlimited data don't get you far if what you want to use your phone for doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't really see them passing up a chance to start talking about LTE and what strides they have made. People need to know the network is going to get better. We take a lot of the info get gain from sites like this for granted. The average joe only knows what Sprint tells him or he/she sees from their phone. If I didn't know about NV I would have split from them by now. Great pricing and unlimited data don't get you far if what you want to use your phone for doesn't work.

 

If they talk about it, it will be of a general nature. Nothing earth shattering or anything you wouldn't already know about. Things like, "And this new HTC device will be running on our new high speed LTE network. The first markets of Atlanta and San Antonio will be live in June."

 

Anything beyond those type of generalities will be shocking. :imo:

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they talk about it, it will be of a general nature. Nothing earth shattering or anything you wouldn't already know about. Things like, "And this new HTC device will be running on our new high speed LTE network. The first markets of Atlanta and San Antonio will be live in June."

 

Anything beyond those type of generalities will be shocking. :imo:

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

I completely agree with this. A smart keynote will quickly give you the big picture idea and the same details people like us on this forum have known about for months. But I do think they will be talking up the letters LTE a lot over the next few months. They are kinda in a pickle for marketing right now.

 

They need to tell the world that they are switching to LTE as fast as they can. But without any LTE phones for sale at the moment they dont want to over hype their upcoming products, preventing them from selling the phones they are currently selling. Sprint is not really one to get to deep into the details of anything but I do they they will want to move focus from "4G" to "LTE".

 

Now after thinking about this maybe they will keep the focus on "4G". This would allow them to still hype their curent phones and wouldn't discredit their upgrades or "new 4G" phones. I think it will be very interesting to see how they market LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any word on the Dallas upgrade plan? I know it is in the first round of upgrades. There are a few locations where I seem to get > 1MB speeds so I suppose those might be upgraded towers but near my place in Plano I'm lucky if the Speedtest.net test will even complete, let alone break the 100K barrier.

 

I'm also curious what frequencies Sprint owns in this market - if they have the full iDen spectrum or are limited. I presume they own the PCS G block and the normal range of PCS frequencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Robert, a whole ago you were saying that you have some new info related to the NV rollout in Orange County, CA. Recently, the service hasn't been allowing me to connect to 3G in some parts of the county. Even when I update my prl it will connect to 3G for a second then revert back to the slower network. Any chance this is because they pushed forward the NV here? I know it's a long shot, but I only ask because of what you said earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest mikeinva2

Any information on Richmond Virginia? It would seem logical to connect the markets together between Washington DC and the Virginia Beach / Raleigh / Charlotte markets. Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any word on the Dallas upgrade plan? I know it is in the first round of upgrades. There are a few locations where I seem to get > 1MB speeds so I suppose those might be upgraded towers but near my place in Plano I'm lucky if the Speedtest.net test will even complete, let alone break the 100K barrier.

 

I'm also curious what frequencies Sprint owns in this market - if they have the full iDen spectrum or are limited. I presume they own the PCS G block and the normal range of PCS frequencies.

 

DFW market deployment is going hot and heavy. I don't have any specifics to report at this time other than our NV Sites complete map that we update a few times per week in the Sponsor section.

 

So Robert, a whole ago you were saying that you have some new info related to the NV rollout in Orange County, CA. Recently, the service hasn't been allowing me to connect to 3G in some parts of the county. Even when I update my prl it will connect to 3G for a second then revert back to the slower network. Any chance this is because they pushed forward the NV here? I know it's a long shot, but I only ask because of what you said earlier.

 

I don't see any evidence for that at the moment.

 

Any information on Richmond Virginia? It would seem logical to connect the markets together between Washington DC and the Virginia Beach / Raleigh / Charlotte markets. Just a thought.

 

Markets the size of Richmond that have WiMax seem to be specifically selected not to be in the first two rounds of Network Vision. And the people who live in similar sized markets without WiMax are happy for that.

 

Where markets are geographically make little difference in deployment. For instance, if the crews were leaving Norfolk went to Richmond or Central PA, what's the difference? Only the difference is mileage once when they relocate.

 

But in reality, these crews will not likely relocate anyway. 90% of NV work is done by subcontractors. And the subs often change from market to market. So this makes the market order even less important from a strategic planning perspective.

 

In some sense, a lot of Network Vision could be done simulateneously in many more markets. But Sprint doesn't have the manpower resources to manage such an undertaking and doesn't have the cash to pay for so much work in such a short period of time. It would be a disaster!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basic question. The coverage maps, are they the final coverage when all of NV is complete (800MHz) or will that be the coverage for LTE when the first phase at 1900Mhz rolls out (For example, June in the first markets)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basic question. The coverage maps, are they the final coverage when all of NV is complete (800MHz) or will that be the coverage for LTE when the first phase at 1900Mhz rolls out (For example, June in the first markets)?

 

I'm not clear which coverage maps you are referring to. Sprint will likely only show coverage that is live on their coverage maps, not future coverages. But Sprint is not posting any LTE coverage maps at the moment.

 

Here at S4GRU, we currently are only showing one LTE coverage map. And that's in Atlanta. And it only shows live LTE coverage on the map. We may consider in the future doing future coverage maps for interest. However, we have our hands pretty full just creating live coverage maps at the moment.

 

We will post static images of our coverage maps in public areas, however the interactive coverage maps are in our Premier Sponsor area at the moment.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your quick reply. I'm talking about the coverage maps on your site here.. specifically the Atlanta one, but you do have many: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/gallery/image/127-sprint-market-map-atlantaathens/

 

Where I live there is no 4G (Wimax), but there is very close. This map looks as if I will have 4GLTE where I live. Just wanted to confirm if this coverage is what it will be this June, or after ALL NV is done.

 

Thanks again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your quick reply. I'm talking about the coverage maps on your site here.. specifically the Atlanta one, but you do have many: http://s4gru.com/ind...-atlantaathens/

 

Where I live there is no 4G (Wimax), but there is very close. This map looks as if I will have 4GLTE where I live. Just wanted to confirm if this coverage is what it will be this June, or after ALL NV is done.

 

Thanks again!

 

The coverage shown in the referenced Atlanta map is live now. And we will be adding more sites to this map in the next week with even more coverage.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The coverage shown in the referenced Atlanta map is live now. And we will be adding more sites to this map in the next week with even more coverage.

 

Robert

Sorry I'm confused. I thought the circles in yellow on all the upcoming markets, like mine in Tampa, are the sites that will be active once nv is complete. Tampa's for example, are the yellow circles ones that will be live once nv is complete, or some of the sites will come online with the rest later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I'm confused. I thought the circles in yellow on all the upcoming markets' date=' like mine in Tampa, are the sites that will be active once nv is complete. Tampa's for example, are the yellow circles ones that will be live once nv is complete, or some of the sites will come online with the rest later?[/quote']

 

Yes. The maps in the market articles are showing all sites. That is correct.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it to early in the game or is there a list of places that for SURE won't be getting LTE?

Fireguy, the entire Sprint owned network will be getting LTE. The only area where future NV/LTE deployment is not known is the Swiftel Affiliate operated area in Brookings, South Dakota.

 

Edit: To expand on that, Sprint has one other affiliate area owned/operated by Shentel in northern Virginia, and parts of Pennsylvania, Maryland and West Virginia. They have committed to deploying Network Vision and LTE.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, Sprint is adding LTE 1900 to 99%+ of all their sites nationwide. The only places they are not is in the handful of places they cannot. Less than 100 sites.

 

Sprint will be installing LTE 800 later in 2013 at approx. 80% of their sites. There are places they cannot install 800 LTE because they do not have enough spectrum, or other licensing or logistics constraints. Sprint is working with Clearwire to have LTE 2600 starting to go on sites in 2013 as well for additional capacity.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, Sprint is adding LTE 1900 to 99%+ of all their sites nationwide. The only places they are not is in the handful of places they cannot. Less than 100 sites.

 

Sprint will be installing LTE 800 later in 2013 at approx. 80% of their sites. There are places they cannot install 800 LTE because they do not have enough spectrum, or other licensing or logistics constraints. Sprint is working with Clearwire to have LTE 2600 starting to go on sites in 2013 as well for additional capacity.

 

Robert

 

Why wouldn't they be able to put LTE 1900 on 100 sites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't they be able to put LTE 1900 on 100 sites?

 

Can't get backhaul to support it at the site location. Could not negotiate changing the leases with the site owner. Zoning changes that allow grandfathered operations but not new operations. And I am sure there are others. However, it is such a small fraction of sites that will not get LTE 1900 that is almost not worth noting.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...