Jump to content

Motorola X Users Thread!


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

huh

 

Backstory...

 

I have a s4 which was my first (kept) android device after being a loyal iPhone user. Love the screen, dislike touchwiz and it's actually a bit too big..

 

Clearwire has a bunch of towers where I work so I figured I'd get a tri band phone - the iPhone 5C or 5s, but that's only 2 bands. So I said hmm maybe the X is it but it's only got 1 band.

 

The Nexus 5 had me at $350...but the poor camera and well the long wait times have me looking at the iPhone again or X.

 

Oh I just sold my s4 so I need to make up my mind I suppose before I ship it out ;-)

 

Sorry for the soap opera posting :-)

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

AJ is correct. Historic Nextel service has no bearing on Sprint 800MHz service. Sprint is not deploying on Nextel sites but in only a handful of locations. Sprint is taking Nextel's 800MHz spectrum and putting it on Sprint sites.

 

So what matters is not where Nextel used to be, but where Sprint will broadcast CDMA & LTE 800 and how far it reaches from their sites. In most areas, this will be great. This is only bad news for areas far outside Sprint service, but were within Nextel service areas.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simply: Understanding I'm looking for subjective opinion, not objective fact, is 1900 good enough, or does support for just that one band make the X a non-starter for most people?

It really is a question of geography and needs. It's not a question we can answer. If Sprint Band 25 LTE (1900) deployed in your area and the places you go meets your needs, then a UniBand LTE device will work for you.

 

I will say this though. About 30% of Sprint customers are better off now with a Triband device. About 60% will be better off with a Triband device in 6 months. And 90% will be better off within one year. So basically, if you're signing a two year contract, you can count that not having Triband will be a significant hindrance the second half of your contract. And depending on where you live, maybe much sooner.

 

I'd further add, if I lived in a Samsung NV market, I would probably want a Triband, as LTE 800 is coming soon to most of them. Also, if I lived in a Shentel market, I definitely would want a Triband as they are going to have LTE 800 all over the place soon. If I lived in a capacity constrained market like Houston or Chicago, I definitely would want a Triband. And if I lived in one of the Band 41 active deploying Clearwire markets, I probably would want a Triband.

 

Maybe this info helps you make up your mind.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, AJ. But, I have a question about ”what it all means”. I've tried to ask it before, but maybe I am trying to get too far down into the weeds, so I get very specific answers but what I'm really looking for is a high-level analysis.

 

Simply: Understanding I'm looking for subjective opinion, not objective fact, is 1900 good enough, or does support for just that one band make the X a non-starter for most people?

1900 being good enough would really depend on where you live.  Also the fact that the moto x is single bad makes it a non purchase most that consider themselves wireless enthusiasts but for your average consumer it probably won't make a difference until they get more educated on the matter.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ is correct. Historic Nextel service has no bearing on Sprint 800MHz service. Sprint is not deploying on Nextel sites but in only a handful of locations. Sprint is taking Nextel's 800MHz spectrum and putting it on Sprint sites.

 

So what matters is not where Nextel used to be, but where Sprint will broadcast CDMA & LTE 800 and how far it reaches from their sites. In most areas, this will be great. This is only bad news for areas far outside Sprint service, but were within Nextel service areas.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

that explains why I have seen two nextel only towers brought down (not the tower just the equipment) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really is a question of geography and needs. It's not a question we can answer. If Sprint Band 25 LTE (1900) deployed in your area and the places you go meets your needs, then a UniBand LTE device will work for you.

 

I will say this though. About 30% of Sprint customers are better off now with a Triband device. About 60% will be better off with a Triband device in 6 months. And 90% will be better off within one year. So basically, if you're signing a two year contract, you can count that not having Triband will be a significant hindrance the second half of your contract. And depending on where you live, maybe much sooner.

 

I'd further add, if I lived in a Samsung NV market, I would probably want a Triband, as LTE 800 is coming soon to most of them. Also, if I lived in a Shentel market, I definitely would want a Triband as they are going to have LTE 800 all over the place soon. If I lived in a capacity constrained market like Houston or Chicago, I definitely would want a Triband. And if I lived in one of the Band 41 active deploying Clearwire markets, I probably would want a Triband.

 

Maybe this info helps you make up your mind.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

what about the Alcatel markets (NE)? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that explains why I have seen two nextel only towers brought down (not the tower just the equipment)

If I was in an A/L market, it would depend on whether I was in/or frequently travel to a current WiMax market that would be getting Band 41 LTE upgrades, or if I was in an area that desperately needs LTE 800 (like Torrington does).

 

No matter what, based on my needs and desires, I would only buy Triband. However, if I was not me, then I would only consider a UniBand in A/L areas if I lived in an area with solid LTE 1900 coverage that met my needs everywhere I went.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was in an A/L market, it would depend on whether I was in/or frequently travel to a current WiMax market that would be getting Band 41 LTE upgrades, or if I was in an area that desperately needs LTE 800 (like Torrington does).

 

No matter what, based on my needs and desires, I would only buy Triband. However, if I was not me, then I would only consider a UniBand in A/L areas if I lived in an area with solid LTE 1900 coverage that met my needs everywhere I went.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

as always I thank the Great Oracle ;-)

 

 

the mid section of CT is or was heavy wimax -- I didn't think band 41 was coming anytime soon though after the Spark roll out plans (or is band 41 and Spark two different things?) that just share the same bands? 

 

Yeah the hilly landscape or Torrington could use 800 BUT I'm not holding my breathe LOL  :-)  but will welcome it if it comes :-) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say this though. About 30% of Sprint customers are better off now with a Triband device. About 60% will be better off with a Triband device in 6 months. And 90% will be better off within one year. 

 

Would the other 10% of us be in SouthernLinc's native coverage area?  Minus Atlanta who I would think will see some band 41 love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1900 being good enough would really depend on where you live.  Also the fact that the moto x is single bad makes it a non purchase most that consider themselves wireless enthusiasts but for your average consumer it probably won't make a difference until they get more educated on the matter.

 

I never considered myself a wireless enthusiast because I don't know as much as a lot of members here, but I suppose I am since going forward all my phones will be triband.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My problem is that I have a phone that's nearly 4 years old.  Money doesn't prevent me from upgrading; size does.  I've been waiting forever for decently sized phones to reappear.  They're still too big, but the Moto X or Verizon Droid Mini are good enough.  But...  I don't want to pay Verizon prices and the X is single band LTE.  That's why I'm trying to figure out if I can live with the Moto X with just 1900mHz LTE.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My problem is that I have a phone that's nearly 4 years old. Money doesn't prevent me from upgrading; size does. I've been waiting forever for decently sized phones to reappear. They're still too big, but the Moto X or Verizon Droid Mini are good enough. But... I don't want to pay Verizon prices and the X is single band LTE. That's why I'm trying to figure out if I can live with the Moto X with just 1900mHz LTE.

 

Why don't you look at the s4 mini. Its smaller than the motto x and is tri band.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I've come searching for info and help with my Sprint Moto X.  :)

 

My area is basically 3G, and I do get 4G when I move into other areas (Los Angeles, etc.).  Earlier this year, upgrades began on my local tower here in Belmont Heights, Long Beach, CA and my once crystal clear calls turned digital and robotic sounding.  I went from a Motorola XPRT to an HTC One but the call quality was so far below what I was used to, I've gone to a Moto X.  I really like the Moto X.  Now, though better, I still needed help, so Sprint sent me an Airave.

 

The Airave gives me crystal clear calls once again, however I can see disconnects/reconnects by watching the bars on my phone.  The bars should be solid, especially if I'm in the same room as the Airave!  This in turn has negatively affected my battery life while in range of the Airave.  I have not dropped a call but while on Wifi, my bars go from full to none every 6 minutes, like clockwork.  If I try to connect a call, the bars pop back up.  If I connect to the internet while the disconnect is happening, it stalls saying No Network Connection, but eventually connects.

 

Airave support has checked it out on their end and I've taken my phone to a Sprint Store.  All is apparently well.  So well in fact that they won't send me another Airave to try.  Sprint asked me to call FiOS to check their router and I've done that, i's good too. 

 

I'm not an enthusiast, so I'd love to know what you all think, or if something rings a bell.  Any thoughts would be appreciated.  They say that 4G is around the corner for me, and that it could well solve all of my problems, but I'm not going to hold my breath.  I'm already blue in the face.

 

Anyone out there have an Airave with their Moto X?  Any luck?  If I'm in the wrong thread, please let me know.  Thanks!

Edited by GoldMember
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would the other 10% of us be in SouthernLinc's native coverage area?  Minus Atlanta who I would think will see some band 41 love.

 

That 10% are people who live or go to places that will not have any Band 26 or Band 41 LTE within the next 9 months.  Rural places in the South and along the international borders are largely that 10%,  However, most of these places will get Band 41 eventually, just in a period beyond the next 9 months.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 10% are people who live or go to places that will not have any Band 26 or Band 41 LTE within the next 9 months. Rural places in the South and along the international borders are largely that 10%, However, most of these places will get Band 41 eventually, just in a period beyond the next 9 months.

 

Robert

Thanks Robert. Have you heard anything about band 26 in SouthernLinc territory by chance, specifically Birmingham, AL? I am trying to talk myself into a triband phone but am not finding any reasons right now.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Robert. Have you heard anything about band 26 in SouthernLinc territory by chance, specifically Birmingham, AL? I am trying to talk myself into a triband phone but am not finding any reasons right now.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

We have not heard anything more recently.  It is possible that they will deploy 3MHz Band 26 LTE.  Which would run much better than even well performing 3G.  But Birmingham will not be an early adopter of Band 41.  

 

It is likely your area will receive 3MHz Band 26 and even Band 41 in some areas in less than the next 2 years.  So if you really want a new device, a Triband would still be a good option.  And it will allow you to use more bands when you travel.  However, if you really want a specific single band LTE device, then it would not be the end of the world considering where you live.

 

Also note though that Triband LTE devices have noticeably better performance on Band 25 than single band devices.  I'm not sure if that is important to you though.  Just food for thought.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also note though that Triband LTE devices have noticeably better performance on Band 25 than single band devices.

 

Robert

Thanks, that's pretty significant in itself.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone out there have an Airave with their Moto X?  Any luck?  If I'm in the wrong thread, please let me know.  Thanks!

 

Not yet, but if 800mhz voice performance isn't good enough when they unroll it, I will be getting an Airave.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Is the UL and DL channels right though? Ohh crap. Must be a mistake then. I couldn't remember if Moto X was tri band or not. Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

The DL channel of 8665 is Band 25 LTE.  See the link below.

 

http://www.cellmapper.net/arfcn?net=LTE&ARFCN=8665&MNC=302

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...