Jump to content

Ever wonder what's inside one of those big cellular "panel" antennas?


jeremyandrew

Recommended Posts

Lots of little antennas :cool:

 

IMG_2352.JPG

 

IMG_2353.JPG

 

This single-pole/single-band antenna is nowhere near the beasts being used for NV, but the concept remains mostly the same. In the multi-pole/multi-band antennas, the elements are at 90-degree angles to each other, which allows for port-to-port isolation, there are some larger elements for 800 MHz and there is an internal remote tilt mechanism.

 

This poor fella was being 'flown' to the top of the tower on a particularly blustry winter afternoon many years ago and smacked the tower leg on the way up. The radome was instantly destroyed but we had a spare on-hand, so it was taken back to the office and given an autopsy. I found a special place for it in the dumpster yesterday, but though I should take a few pictures.

  • Like 28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of little antennas :cool:

 

This single-pole/single-band antenna is nowhere near the beasts being used for NV, but the concept remains mostly the same. In the multi-pole/multi-band antennas, the elements are at 90-degree angles to each other, which allows for port-to-port isolation, there are some larger elements for 800 MHz and there is an internal remote tilt mechanism.

 

This poor fella was being 'flown' to the top of the tower on a particularly blustry winter afternoon many years ago and smacked the tower leg on the way up. The radome was instantly destroyed but we had a spare on-hand, so it was taken back to the office and given an autopsy. I found a special place for it in the dumpster yesterday, but though I should take a few pictures.

 

I know this may be hard to believe for some, but I had never seen inside a panel that close up before. Thanks for sharing!

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, in addition to directionality, multiple antennas are key to dBi gain.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like AJ taught us to call them sites instead of towers I find myself calling these the proper name of antennas and not panels.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

Yeah, I suppose technically the panel is just the housing. And the housing provides no functionality except to protect the internal antennas from the elements. So the panel ain't nothing but a thang, all things considered.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of little antennas :cool:

BULK OF ORIGINAL POST REMOVED -----

multi-pole/multi-band antennas, the elements are at 90-degree angles to each other, which allows for port-to-port isolation, there are some larger elements for 800 MHz and there is an internal remote tilt mechanism.

 

Can somebody clarify this a little. In Multi-band antennas, if the elements are at 90 degree angles to each other, does this mean that the 1900 signal and the 800 signal will be sent in entirely different directions?? If your home is in the "Poor Spot" for a 1900 signal because of the 1900 signal not being aimed at your location, is it possible that the 800 signal might just be leaving the cell site in a different direction and be aimed at your location even by default? Would the 800 signal leave the cell site at a 90 degree angle to the 1900 signal.

 

I know that they can have the capability to move the aiming left or right or up and down slightly, but is the starting point off by 90 degrees as the default??? Good technical question maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that they can have the capability to move the aiming left or right or up and down slightly, but is the starting point off by 90 degrees as the default??? Good technical question maybe.

 

I am not certain of this, but some of the antenna elements may be horizontally polarized, others vertically polarized.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not certain of this, but some of the antenna elements may be horizontally polarized, others vertically polarized.

 

AJ

 

I always thought that Cell/PCS signals were always vertical polarization probably because of the old pull-out antennas on the older cell phones. Horizontal polarization is not normally a good thing for portable devices. At least that is what I was taught many years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bands will have roughly the same azimuth. The elements have a polarization offset from each other for diversity reasons not to be confused with the azimuth or downtilt.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought that Cell/PCS signals were always vertical polarization probably because of the old pull-out antennas on the older cell phones. Horizontal polarization is not normally a good thing for portable devices. At least that is what I was taught many years ago.

 

If memory serves me correctly, the FCC required AMPS signals to be cross polarized on the uplink and downlink. And as I sort through FCC OET filings for my device authorization articles, the uplink ERP/EIRP figures that I see are almost always greater with horizontal polarization than with vertical polarization -- though, I do spot an occasional anomaly, in which the vertical polarization for a particular band/band class is greater.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I always thought that Cell/PCS signals were always vertical polarization probably because of the old pull-out antennas on the older cell phones. Horizontal polarization is not normally a good thing for portable devices. At least that is what I was taught many years ago.

 

The elements are +45 and -45 degrees so technically not completely vertically or horizontally polarized.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The elements are +45 and -45 degrees so technically not completely vertically or horizontally polarized.

 

Sent from my little Note2

Designing antennas for Cell/PCS phones has to be a very tough job. The phone can be in any position at any time. When held up to the ear, it rarely is totally vertical and can be almost horizontal. The phone can be laying on its back on a desk. Or in a holster on a guys belt or upside down in a ladies pocketbook. It has to be able to pick up a signal of almost any polarization.

 

Did we determine that the multi-band antennas used at a NV site would normally transmit a 1900 and a 800 signal in the same direction with Sprint having the ability to possibly shift one of the two signals slightly if desired? This is what I originally believed to be true, but the earlier statement about a 90 degree difference in the elements really can be interpreted in several ways.

I am thinking it may be that the 800 signal might need to be shifted in direction slightly at some sites to keep the more powerful 800 signal from being aimed at another nearby site. You would not really want two adjacent sites blasting out a 800 signal directly at each other. This might cause issues where it did not with 1900 signals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The three sections for the six antennas have independent remote downtilt adjustments. I haven't seen anything for remote azimuth though.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

I haven't seen them installed at any of the NV sites, but antennas with remote steering(azimuth) are available. Take a look at this KMW catalog. http://www.kmw.co.kr/popup/KMW_Antenna_Cata_Rev1.0.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen them installed at any of the NV sites, but antennas with remote steering(azimuth) are available. Take a look at this KMW catalog. http://www.kmw.co.kr...Cata_Rev1.0.pdf

 

Figured someone had them as it would be relatively simple. Now if only Sprint would install them so they could easily fix the cheeseball mistakes the RF interns made in several areas with the NV rollout ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have assumed that the mechanical steering is only for gross adjustments and the majority of the steering is in the DSP processing. Maybe it isn't that advanced yet but you can use the interference from multiple antennas and a lot of horsepower to steer the signal or even pick out multiple transmitters on the same frequency at the same time by discriminating in the spatial dimension. Anyone stuck in the old world of basic antenna design and mechanical tilt adjustments is far behind the times ;)

 

 

Anyone with deeper knowledge of LTE and how the new NV equipment works have more info? Are they at this level yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Haven't posted in a while, but I happened across one of the antennas being used in the NV deployment that is defective and was replaced. I couldn't help but see what makes it tick and thought I would share. This is a 6-pole, dual band(800/1900) antenna from Andrew with Remote Electrical Tilt.

 

The antenna is about 6 feet tall
IMG_4118.JPG

 

The RF and RET connections

IMG_4119.JPG

 

Under the radome. The 800 arrays are in the top-most and bottom-most positions

IMG_4121.JPG

 

 

The 800 array

IMG_4123.JPG

 

 

The backside. You can see the RET motors, all of the tiny hardline and the Electrical Tilt arrays

IMG_4124.JPG

 

 

The 1900 tilt array

IMG_4125.JPG

 

 

Enjoy.

 

http://imgur.com/Jw5yMTd,v8BqWTg,eDfn2ni,CS6NFRb,gPhTV6O,5tGPZsk,AZ327Sw,SMaNEKe

  • Like 30
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wireless nerd porn! Thx!!

No, that does not do it justice. This is practically gynecological wireless nerd porn.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'd be awesome to take a look inside an RRU as well. I used to take our VCRs, the TV and my Atari and Nintendo apart when I was growing up. My parents nearly had a heart attack since back then, our Zenith VCR was nearly $700. Fortunately, I was good at putting things back together, too. It's amazing how many screws and wires you really don't need inside most things...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...