Jump to content

LightSquared Testing


4GHoward

Recommended Posts

Isn't this moot with daddy Soft-bucks? Sprint doesn't need TMO anymore to bulk up.

When I posted that, DISH was still pursuing Sprint and there was no guarantee that SoftBank was going to end up with Sprint. However, some still think that it's possible for a Sprint/Tmo merger and that even SoftBank wanted then both all along. So my post is still quite relevant.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I posted that, DISH was still pursuing Sprint and there was no guarantee that SoftBank was going to end up with Sprint. However, some still think that it's possible for a Sprint/Tmo merger and that even SoftBank wanted then both all along. So my post is still quite relevant.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

You don't think it'd be a good thing for TMO to remain independent? I view TMO as someone potent enough to keep the other 3 honest, just like AMD is to Intel.

Even if their coverage never goes past 228 mil, I still think they'd be useful to keep prices low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I posted that, DISH was still pursuing Sprint and there was no guarantee that SoftBank was going to end up with Sprint. However, some still think that it's possible for a Sprint/Tmo merger and that even SoftBank wanted then both all along. So my post is still quite relevant.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

That is still a goal, according to my sources. T-Mobile is basically putting itself up for sale. Witness Legere's statements in the other thread re:Dish's vision. According to my sources Sprint and T-Mobile have been talking, with a hiatus to allow T-Mobile to close the Metro merger and to set the integration effort in motion. I will ask my sources whether they have resumed or not. 

 

Since both companies are majority owned 78% for Sprint and 74% for T-Mobile and the free market for the stocks is relatively small, stock price will not be the dominant determinant in a merger. The price and relative ownership percentage will have to be negotiated after very arduous negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't think it'd be a good thing for TMO to remain independent? I view TMO as someone potent enough to keep the other 3 honest, just like AMD is to Intel.

Even if their coverage never goes past 228 mil, I still think they'd be useful to keep prices low.

I don't recall giving my opinion about a Tmo/Sprint merger ever. I just was discussing that it's possible when others have said that the FCC won't allow it.

 

The truth is, I don't have an opinion on the merits yet. I think I tend to not like the idea of a merger. But I haven't concluded all my thoughts on the matter.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...