Jump to content

Has Sprint adjusted LTE speeds?


Recommended Posts

Eh, "bandwidth" and "spectrum," in this case, are interchangeable. "Capacity" or "throughput" is different.

 

AJ

 

 

It is confusing. I should have said "data bandwidth" to be more clear. Throughput is defined as bandwidth but so is spectrum. Sorry about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is good, because even with LTE on every site, there's only so much you can do with 5x5 carriers. At some point the capacity well will run dry.

 

If e-penis is a game you wish to engage in, my advice is to hold off for a TD-LTE device.

 

Sprint is quite well positioned for multiple 5x5 LTE carriers in SMR and PCS+G spectrum. AJ has said that most markets have existing spectrum for a second 5x5 LTE carrier. Also, as LTE usage increases, EVDO usage will decrease where those carriers can be re-purposed into LTE.

 

While the pipes in BRS spectrum will be huge, i wouldn't expect to see them outside of major markets and PCS spectrum constrained areas for 2 or 3 years (from launch).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Careful, if you keep changing your devices too often because the newer models always look sexier, you may get an STD-LTE.

 

This is your best post, ever.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's e-penis you want, here's a reminder... Sprint is going to fully own a megaton of spectrum in the 2600 MHz band post-SoftBank transaction. Pay no attention to Sprint saying "we're only going to use this for capacity hotspots". I sense the 2600 is going to be deployed aggressively in a lot of places by SoftBank/Sprint. While they're wise to hide their true ambition, I would wager Sprint has a more aggressive plan than they may be externally letting on.

 

This is good, because even with LTE on every site, there's only so much you can do with 5x5 carriers. At some point the capacity well will run dry.

 

If e-penis is a game you wish to engage in, my advice is to hold off for a TD-LTE device.

 

I agree with you. I believe in time, especially under SoftBank, the TD-LTE layer on Network Vision sites will become pretty ubiquitous. The added cost of TD-LTE at a NV site is pretty minimal. If a site has fast enough backhaul, I think they'll add TD-LTE. And if capacity is needed, they'll expedite the backhaul.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you. I believe in time, especially under SoftBank, the TD-LTE layer on Network Vision sites will become pretty ubiquitous. The added cost of TD-LTE at a NV site is pretty minimal. If a site has fast enough backhaul, I think they'll add TD-LTE. And if capacity is needed, they'll expedite the backhaul.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

What does your gut say on timeframe, NV2.0 in 2014 or further out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does your gut say on timeframe, NV2.0 in 2014 or further out?

 

Since LTE 800 is a part of NV 2.0, it's kind of starting now.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since LTE 800 is a part of NV 2.0, it's kind of starting now.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

Yeah I would imagine since to shutdown of nextel is going down within less than 2 months. 3G 800 in Huntington is really really nice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my house I only get 5mbs with Verizon 4G LTE and the best in town speeds of 10-14mbs on avg, max 30mbs next to tower. In the RDU area speeds have gone down the tubes into the 2-3mbs down/ 1up like AT&T 3G speeds but with better ping. They need some 1700/2100 very soon. The worst I have seen:

Edited by 4ktvs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my house I only get 5mbs with Verizon 4G LTE and the best in town speeds of 10-14mbs on avg, max 30mbs next to tower. In the RDU area speeds have gone down the tubes into the 2-3mbs down/ 1up like AT&T 3G speeds but with better ping. They need some 1700/2100 very soon. The worst I have seen:

 

I can get the same speed as the guy in the video over a non-upgraded 3G tower that usually hovers between 1-2 bars (-100 to -105dBm) so I can hardly wait to throw it in my friends faces that their precious verizon isn't all the map on tv says it is!

 

Screenshot_2013-05-07-08-20-38.png

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/z7rby8d0hkqazxv/Screenshot_2013-05-07-08-20-38.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting really pissed. Service has only gotten worse in the Covington road area. I used to get 3-5 bars 4G. And Now I'm on 3G mainly and it switches time to time on the 4G?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get pissed when people say I have x number of bars of 4g or lte and now I dont... But in all seriousness could be due to many factors, such as work being done to the tower or surrounding towers or the down tilt could have been changed to adjust for other towers going online soon with 4g .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can get the same speed as the guy in the video over a non-upgraded 3G tower that usually hovers between 1-2 bars (-100 to -105dBm) so I can hardly wait to throw it in my friends faces that their precious verizon isn't all the map on tv says it is!

 

Screenshot_2013-05-07-08-20-38.png

 

https://www.dropbox....07-08-20-38.png

 

http://www.speedtest...d/446256294.png

 

Here's one with 104 dbm. You don't even want to know what happens on the weekends at that mall.

 

That was on LTE, not wifi or 3g. Also yes the sprint 3G speed test about the same in there. AT&T speed test at 4mbs down and 1 up on H+/3g and 15+ down/ 5mbs up on LTE just for an idea of how bad Verizon has failed the area. At home it works ok and in most places out side the RDU it works well. I some times think I live in NYC when I see such poor data speeds from LTE though. At lest most of the time it cracks 2mbs outside of that mall of death.

 

There is sprint LTE out side the mall, but the tower closest to it does not have it yet or at lest that's what they told me when I asked to try. They also thought it was funny that my Verizon LTE speeds were so slow.

Edited by 4ktvs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting really pissed. Service has only gotten worse in the Covington road area. I used to get 3-5 bars 4G. And Now I'm on 3G mainly and it switches time to time on the 4G?

 

If your service has degraded in a particular area, call Sprint and open a ticket. I don't like whining.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your service has degraded in a particular area, call Sprint and open a ticket. I don't like whining.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

It seems like you said that once already today but I can't find the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It seems like you said that once already today but I can't find the thread.

 

I probably did. I should get it printed on T shirts. :tu:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I probably did. I should get it printed on T shirts. :tu:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Oooh, would this be the long-awaited official S4GRU t-shirt.? I'll buy one!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 mbps would be fine with me. Of course, considering I struggle to see a reliable 100 kbps it'd be something else.

As someone said, the numbers game is freakin absurd. I talk to a lot of people who sign up for their advertised 20 mbps broadband home service, they are course fail to read the fine print, during peak hours, they end up seeing a 4th of that.

 

I have been able to flawlessly stream true HD over 8 mbps. As far as I'm concerned, there is no possible need for our phones to be much faster than that. If Sprint achieves that consistently, and reliably, THAT's what i care about. I would rather see sprint focus on real world usability. because at the end of the day, most users have no clue what a baud rate is. All they want is stuff to pull up for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me 8Mbps and 40 ms latency that is consistent over 50 Mbps with no one using and much lower speeds and sucky latency during the day.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.speedtest...d/446256294.png

 

Here's one with 104 dbm. You don't even want to know what happens on the weekends at that mall.

 

That was on LTE, not wifi or 3g. Also yes the sprint 3G speed test about the same in there. AT&T speed test at 4mbs down and 1 up on H+/3g and 15+ down/ 5mbs up on LTE just for an idea of how bad Verizon has failed the area. At home it works ok and in most places out side the RDU it works well. I some times think I live in NYC when I see such poor data speeds from LTE though. At lest most of the time it cracks 2mbs outside of that mall of death.

 

There is sprint LTE out side the mall, but the tower closest to it does not have it yet or at lest that's what they told me when I asked to try. They also thought it was funny that my Verizon LTE speeds were so slow.

 

Heheheh. Sounds about right. My office is right by that particular mall if it's the one I'm thinking about (TTC?), and we have a bunch of Verizon lines. Not even LTE, EV-DO. It's nasty.

 

I can't remember if Crabtree is worse or not for Verizon, but I know on AT&T you can pull 10+ mbps on HSPA+ reliably over there...

Edited by techfury90
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...