Jump to content

Site handoffs between markets


Recommended Posts

So this is an issue I've had for many years. I live on the Michigan/Indiana border and frequently travel back and forth between the two states. Northern Indiana is a former iPCS market and my part of West Michigan is a legacy corporate market. When I go back and forth my phone does not hand off to the sites in Indiana and vice versa unless I drive so far out of range that it is forced to. And then it drops the call/data connection.

 

A few years back I spoke with an iPCS engineer at HoFo who made some tweaks and it worked better for a while, but over the last year or two it's been just as bad as it was before. It's a little better going from Michigan to Indiana than it is from Indiana to Michigan.

 

Just an annoyance and was curious if anyone had any insight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Network Vision may or may not make it better. Yes, you will be on all Sprint corporate Samsung infrastructure, rather than the iPCS affiliate legacy mix that you have now. But you will still live near a PCS 1900 MHz license boundary, not to mention an MSC boundary.

 

For example, in Sturgis, you are in the Detroit MTA, where Sprint holds the PCS B block 30 MHz license. But across the state line, Howe is in the South Bend-Mishiwaka BTA, where Sprint holds the PCS D block 10 MHz license. That means your device must switch PCS carrier channels as it crosses the state line.

 

Moreover, your site in Sturgis is backhauled to the Lansing_MSC_2, while the site in Howe is backhauled to the Fort Wayne_MSC_1. So, in the end, when you cross the state line, you experience an inter frequency, inter MSC hard handoff, and those are almost always hit or miss.

 

You can observe the above phenomenon by watching your engineering screens as you cross the state line. You will see SID, NID, CDMA1X carrier channel, and EV-DO carrier channel change.

 

Now, because of the transaction with USCC, Sprint will soon hold PCS B block spectrum in the South Bend-Mishiwaka BTA. So, the chances are good that your PCS carrier channels on both sides of the state line will be harmonized.

 

Additionally, Sprint holds the same SMR 800 MHz spectrum on both sides of the state line. Thus, eventually, your CDMA1X 800 carrier channel will likely remain a consistent SMR 476. But the MSC handoff between Lansing and Fort Wayne (or vice versa) will remain.

 

AJ

  • Like 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What an amazing explanation of just one of probably a thousand complexities of a nationwide cell network.

 

AJ, you are truly an asset around here.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What an amazing explanation of just one of probably a thousand complexities of a nationwide cell network.

 

AJ, you are truly an asset around here.

 

No big deal. I am just trying to put to good use the network operation knowledge and spectrum licensing data that I have accumulated over the years. But I could not speak with any authority about sites on the Michigan/Indiana border 700 miles from me if not for the data extraction and mapping work that Robert and digiblur have so diligently completed. So, give full credit to the team here at S4GRU -- we depend upon and build off the work of each other.

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this is an issue I've had for many years. I live on the Michigan/Indiana border and frequently travel back and forth between the two states. Northern Indiana is a former iPCS market and my part of West Michigan is a legacy corporate market. When I go back and forth my phone does not hand off to the sites in Indiana and vice versa unless I drive so far out of range that it is forced to. And then it drops the call/data connection.

 

A few years back I spoke with an iPCS engineer at HoFo who made some tweaks and it worked better for a while, but over the last year or two it's been just as bad as it was before. It's a little better going from Michigan to Indiana than it is from Indiana to Michigan.

 

Just an annoyance and was curious if anyone had any insight?

Lol tower hand off here is horrible. If by that when your phone switches to a closer tower. If I stay in an area for 5 minutes, I can often switch between 2 towers like crazy and when I'm driving, I don't. Put if I walk the same road, i switch to a closer tower and my service increases. It's really annoying lol No coverage inside, walk out the door and i get 5 bars
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing post AJ...I always dropped calls on I-88 in the Sterling/Rock Falls, IL vicinity when going from the corp. network to iPCS network. When I talked with the iPCS engineers they knew about the problem and was told it was equipment incompatibilities. The write up above shows the complexity of switching a call between markets. I imagine it is more complex with another party involved such as Nex-Tech or one of the remaining affiliates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing post AJ...I always dropped calls on I-88 in the Sterling/Rock Falls, IL vicinity when going from the corp. network to iPCS network. When I talked with the iPCS engineers they knew about the problem and was told it was equipment incompatibilities. The write up above shows the complexity of switching a call between markets. I imagine it is more complex with another party involved such as Nex-Tech or one of the remaining affiliates.

 

Getting the same hardware in a region is just one of many complexities as AJ notes. Has anyone done any testing across NV OEM borders to see if there are any issues like the legacy Motorola equipment saw in Chicago?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Checked and downloading a 1.6 MB Google Play System update.    Still reflects June 1 after. 
    • Rinse and Repeat: T-Mobile Tops 3rd Party Network Report Yet Again https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-dominates-ookla-performance-report-two-years-running
    • The options to ignore GCI/NCI/PLMN/TAC are buggy.. working on resolving it. NSA cells are probably not being logged for most users yet.
    • Boost Mobile – the Newest Wireless Carrier – Launches New State-of-the-Art Nationwide 5G Network, Plans and Branding https://about.dish.com/2024-07-17-Boost-Mobile-the-Newest-Wireless-Carrier-Launches-New-State-of-the-Art-Nationwide-5G-Network,-Plans-and-Branding I'm really digging the relaunch of the brand. The new app is a lot better than before in that it actually feels like they're going a more premium route. The BoostOne app tried to gamify wireless service by making you want videos or download games in order to get discounts on your bill. Now it's decluttered and basically only account management. It's perfect. I was on a promotional $25/month unlimited plan on Boost Mobile and I just switched to the new $25 forever plan which is pretty much the same as before, the only exception being that now I'm price locked. The only thing I wish they'd do is start using QCIs instead of throttling once you use up your allotment of "premium data". I understand that they don't have as much capacity as the big 3 and that they're super reliant on AT&T and T-Mobile outside of major metros but hitting 30GB and being throttled to 512kbps is not competitive. They then try to charge $30 for an extra 10GB of high speed data. The big 3 and their prepaid brands have basically given up on hard throttling and use prioritization instead. They should consider doing the same. The next step for them is getting their name on Apple's websites this fall when the new iPhones drop. That's some of the best advertising a carrier can have. Instantly millions of people will learn that Boost Mobile is an actual carrier if they can pull that off.
    • Use cloud features or backup files first before updating with this firmware.  I updated my S24 Ultra with this update.  T-Mobile and Verizon network esims worked fine.  Dish Rainbow sim appeared to work fine.  Right after that, when I rebooted to another non-public test esim which previously worked fine, I got the Samsung Welcome screen.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...