Jump to content

PRL 25014?


Rukin1
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

2 PRL questions:

 

1. My local GS3's both have PRL 25014. (I have another one that currently lives in Milwaukee, where the following questions are currently irrelevant.)  Is there any practical way to "urge" the GS3 to lock onto 800SMR where available?  All the cells in my area have been upgraded to 800 except for one, which is (of course) the closest to me (I have verified this with Signal Check Pro).  I get better voice/text when my GS3 is on 800SMR, but (as explained in Digiblur's Wall posts on PRLs [Thank you!]), once my phone locks onto 1900PCS, it tends to stay there, even when I move into an area where 800 is stronger.

 

2. One of my GS3's never seems to find 800SMR at all, and sometimes suffers from poor voice connections. Again, both phones are on PRL 25014. At times, I have placed both phones within inches of each other, and checked the connections with Signal Check:  One will often be 1x800, the second will always be1xRTT.  I have tried airplane mode on/off and rebooting, but the silly thing just blissfully stays locked on 1900. Can anyone explain this, or offer a suggestion to improve it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently in the latest PRLs for the S3, 800SMR is scanned first then PCS is scanned.  They are on the same priority level, meaning when connected to PCS your phone will not aggressively scan for anything else since the device is satisfied the scan requirement since it is already at the highest level of priority.  Periodically the device may rescan and find 800SMR though when the baseband is idle. 

 

The only way to make it prefer 800SMR is to flash a custom PRL with 800SMR set at a higher priority.  Now why you are seeing the differences on the two devices I can not answer without seeing both devices, it could even be a defect of one device if it never seems to use 800SMR. 

 

A PRL scan has nothing to do with signal strengths, it will not choose a different network based on signal strength.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I did mention it before, but I don't remember if I did post a picture of it, so I did a 2-for-1 special the second time around. Ah, so that is what I saw. I walk by Boys and Girls field if the C train takes forever to show up in the late evening, but I cared more about getting home than investigating it lol
    • August update finally arrived for S22+ unlocked tonight 👍
    • You also snagged a shot of the new oDAS in there, too.    I also spotted one while on LIRR above Atlantic Ave. They’re starting to really get rolled out now.
    • I have added T-Mobile eNB 879366, a Sprint convert site, to the list of gig+ sites, as I was able to break the 800 Mbps ceiling with it. I'm still trying to understand the DAS mess at LGA and locate them, but the bad thing about it is inside the terminals I can occasionally pick up the macros inside. It anchors 5G, which is great for a speed boost, but occasionally data hangs because my device is having a handoff frenzy trying to pick the best macro and/or band for the 5G connection.   I have spotted 2 more Dish sites, one on the corner of Church Avenue and East 16th (photo below), and the other is an in progress site co-located with Verizon eNB 81069.   At Verizon eNB 81069, the ports on the Dish panel weren't connected yet, brand new racks were being used on the roof Verizon is on, and it looks like Sprint's equip is still up on the building next door.
    • Neat!  Thanks.  Most of my issues at the moment are from inexperience.  I've never used AT commands and I'm bad at Python.  I'm not really sure what the best way is to send AT commands to the modem; socat seems to work, and there are Python libraries that should do it, but I don't really know what I'm doing.  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...