Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was unware that Sensorly tests on the iPhone doesn't report the conditions - maybe they'll improve it.

 

That being said does anyone know why they opted for turning on Chanhassen/Eden Prairie and Jordan first?

 

My friend had a weird idea that they'd turn it on at the MSP Airport first so that visitors would know that Sprint had LTE.

 

The Sensorly issues is Apple not allowing access to the needed information. So unless Apple changes, Sensorly won't be able to collect information on iPhones any time soon.

 

As far as which towers are first, there is no plan in regards to population or strategic locations. Sprint is doing whichever tower is ready first. This means whichever tower has the planning complete, the proper permits, backhaul in place, etc. If they waited until towers were ready for a strategic deployment, we would still be waiting for the first markets to start. So while the order doesn't really make sense, it means bringing LTE to the area sooner, even if it's not in the way that people would like.

  • Like 1
Posted

Was just driving around minutes ago and glanced at my phone, noticed it was connected to LTE. This is out in Chanhassen on powers blvd and kerber blvd. 2wbwzec.png

  • Like 2
Posted

A new site appeared on Sensorly between Maple Grove and Corcoran, right where it was shown on our NV Sites Complete map. ;)

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The Sensorly issues is Apple not allowing access to the needed information. So unless Apple changes, Sensorly won't be able to collect information on iPhones any time soon.

 

As far as which towers are first, there is no plan in regards to population or strategic locations. Sprint is doing whichever tower is ready first. This means whichever tower has the planning complete, the proper permits, backhaul in place, etc. If they waited until towers were ready for a strategic deployment, we would still be waiting for the first markets to start. So while the order doesn't really make sense, it means bringing LTE to the area sooner, even if it's not in the way that people would like.

 

There's a tower in the middle of Wisconsin that has LTE and its around nothing. Completed tower from what I understand.

Edited by sprintuserryan
Posted

There's a tower in the middle of Wisconsin that has LTE and its around nothing. Completed tower from what I understand.

 

Let us known where it is when you find out. It has never appeared in any of our update lists we receive from Sprint.

 

Robert

Posted (edited)

Did anyone see the new one pop up between last night late and this morning near Andover/Anoka? It looks just south of Bunker Hills Park off 242. If you take 242 and exit at University and head to Adler you should be getting LTE there.

 

Jordan's coverage is a bit odd - it's all near Sunset Drive and Creek Lane near the Spirit Hill cemetery.in one little section on the west side of town.

 

It also looks like the Eden Prarie/Chanhassen coverage has extended further east and west although it could be more people running sensory to get a bigger picture of the actual coverage.

 

I was out there last night and if you were near Audobon Road and highway 5 (right near Prince's Paisley Park studio) my phone practically glowed red in my hands and I was getting about 22 Mbps down and about 9 Mbps up. Very strong signal but not 100%.

 

Speedtest gave the location of the server as Minnetonka with GPS co-ords of 44.9800 latitude and -93.2638 longitude.

Edited by aliensporebomb
Posted

Lake susan and lake ann parks in chanhassen are netting some good speeds...20-30mbps. Coverage is pretty isolated atm to a 2-3 mile stretch outwards from hwy 5 and drops off shortly before 62 after 494 on 5. Going to be nice when more towers pop up for sure. I haven't gone further west yet to see when it drops off, i'm not sure it stretches past hwy 41.

9te6gy.png

Posted
Lake susan and lake ann parks in chanhassen are netting some good speeds...20-30mbps. Coverage is pretty isolated atm to a 2-3 mile stretch outwards from hwy 5 and drops off shortly before 62 after 494 on 5. Going to be nice when more towers pop up for sure. I haven't gone further west yet to see when it drops off, i'm not sure it stretches past hwy 41.

 

Thanks for your report and happy screen shot. That's decent coverage out of just one live site, all things considered. I'm glad ton see things starting to go live in the Minnesota market.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

 

 

Posted
Hopefully we see something in the east Metro soon.

 

Wait, east metro, and you have a packers logo? SMH

  • Like 1
Posted
There's a tower in the middle of Wisconsin that has LTE and its around nothing. Completed tower from what I understand.

 

If you can, download GpsFix"]GpsFix, walk up to the tower or at least go to the driveway leading to it, open GpsFix"]GpsFix let it get a fix, write down the latitude and longitude and report back with it. I'll use that to get the exact coordinates from the FCC's database and hand it off to Robert unless he gets to it before me.

 

Thank you for helping us out!

Posted

And we have more - looks like a large swath going west to east from 694 and Brooklyn Boulevard all the way east to 694 and 100. Then there is more farther to the east; near 694 and Central. Then the previously mentioned Bunker Hills Park blip is now a long north/south swath from just north of Blaine High School to south as far as 116th and some additional spots at 113th and 111th.

 

C'mon Bloomington!

  • Like 1
Posted

I might check out a tower near Hugo tomorrow that is supposedly completed. I did get up to the Blaine sight today also and did a little mapping right where decahedtron said. I had to do the airplane mode thing to get the 4G, but after that my phone stayed locked on it until we went too far south.

  • Like 1
Posted

Anyone know how far out of the cities area they will be going? Corcoran is like 10 miles from my house... 94 up to st. Cloud should be a pretty high priority right? Sitting here in St. Michael hoping to get some of these speeds at home soon!

Posted

Anyone know how far out of the cities area they will be going? Corcoran is like 10 miles from my house... 94 up to st. Cloud should be a pretty high priority right? Sitting here in St. Michael hoping to get some of these speeds at home soon!

 

Sprint has over 38,000 sites nation wide, all but about 100 (they have special site issues) are getting NV upgrades (LTE, 3G, and backhaul improvements). 80% of those the getting NV upgrades will also get the 800 mhz added and because it travels further it should cover the same areas getting main upgrades . So if you get Sprint service now its almost certain it will be a little beter on 3G signal level and speed wise and you will get LTE when its done. LTE is very signal level dependent and doesn't travel as quite as far as 3G/voice so if your in a very fringe service area that might be another issue. The weaker the LTE signal the slower your transfer too.

 

Starting next year sometime devices with 800 mhz LTE will be ship ready for the 800mhz LTE to come after the current round of major upgrades are done. Sites to get 800 mhz will have most all the work done already, compatible antenna and remote radio units are going up now.

 

Just repeating what I have read here several times. No LTE for me yet.

  • Like 1
Posted

If I was sprint I would be starting roll out in smaller cities in order to test the system. Chaska/Chan would be a great place to start considering its a growing market.

Posted

If I was sprint I would be starting roll out in smaller cities in order to test the system. Chaska/Chan would be a great place to start considering its a growing market.

 

I think, instead, they are rolling out 4g only in the first batch of towers, so as not to affect the existing network.

Posted

Anecdotally it seems like 3G speeds are edging upwards in recent weeks. I never got speeds on 3G that high last October.

I totally agree, normally I don't run many speed tests on 3g, I pulled some really nice numbers in Eagan the other day.
Posted (edited)

has anyone seen other work being done in the eden praire, chan area.. Just curious..

Edited by bogeypro
Posted (edited)

A pattern is starting to emerge - sensorly's map now shows Hugo as definitely active. So in the northern 'burbs we have several blips on the map showing Andover/Anoka, Corcoran, Brooklyn Center and Hugo all evenly distributed from west to east.

 

In the South it is thus far weighted to the Southwest with Eden Prairie and Chanhassen although Jordan is not really a suburb, it's pretty far out. So far, nothing in the south or southeast but I do not think we will have to wait for long.

Edited by aliensporebomb
Posted

A pattern is starting to emerge - sensorly's map now shows Hugo as definitely active. So in the northern 'burbs we have several blips on the map showing Andover/Anoka, Corcoran, Brooklyn Center and Hugo all evenly distributed from west to east.

 

In the South it is thus far weighted to the Southwest with Eden Prairie and Chanhassen although Jordan is not really a suburb, it's pretty far out. So far, nothing in the south or southeast but I do not think we will have to wait for long.

 

 

Yea,I got up to Hugo around 4pm and played around.

Posted

New to the forums, I live in shakopee minnesota about 20 minutes south of the cities sitting in my bedroom i pull down LTE at about 2 bars with 4-7 mbps download speeds. My neighbor works in jordan and gets FULL LTE signal strength and is consistently pulling down 15-35 mbps securing that market for LTE service activation. Will update as i see fit. Noticing it more and more everyday in the south metro!!!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Vinegar Hill is getting the Brooklyn Heights treatment now with regard to small cells. I mapped two more small cells in the neighborhood in the past few days so now T-Mobile is up to 8 of them in such a tiny neighborhood. While it's cool they're doing this since it means outdoors you get a consistent 400Mbps+ almost everywhere, it sucks because they're obviously deploying so many of them to make up for their lack of a macro site in the entire neighborhood. Because there isn't a macro, the small cells have a greater coverage area than you see in other neighborhoods and you often connect to them while indoors but coverage and speeds fall off indoors much faster on small cells than on macros in my experience.  Even Dish has better coverage than T-Mobile in Vinegar Hill since they added the site on top of the Extra Space Storage building alongside AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile needs to get in line with their competitors there.
    • It seems like that is the smallest Google Play System change that google releases. I see 12 MB updates really regularly. 
    • Went back to Greenville last week and what an insane change 4 years has made! Every site in the city has n25/41/71 now and T-Mobile has even added new sites in the city since the last time I was there. As a result, their coverage and speeds are great everywhere. Unfortunately I don't have my Verizon line anymore so I'm unable to compare their performance to T-Mobile but they definitely had better coverage and speeds than AT&Tin my testing.  On the LTE side of things, T-Mobile has 5MHz Band 71, 10MHz Band 66, and 5MHz Band 2 deployed. On the 5G side, they have 190MHz n41, 15MHz n25, and 15MHz n71 deployed. As you'd expect 5G is several times faster than LTE here because of that. One thing I noticed though is that T-Mobile's speeds pretty much never go above 1Gbps here. I'm not sure if it's a backhaul limitation or if they're seriously pushing their 5G home internet product here but on most sites I was seeing 500-600Mbps with some sites having peaks in the high 800s-low 900's. I also noticed that upload speeds weren't nearly as good as they were in NYC. I attribute this to the fact that site spacing often cause the phone to drop to n25 or n71 for uploads as opposed to using n41. I have a handful of high (>100Mbps) upload speed tests but that was with me virtually right next to a site. Since I drove my own car instead of riding with family, I used the opportunity to map a ton of rural roads outside to Greenville to see what kind of coverage I'd get. T-Mobile has stepped up their game a ton in this regard as I found that coverage matched and in many cases surpassed what I was seeing on AT&T. areas where AT&T dropped to 1 bar or even no signal, I held onto weak n71 and was still able to place calls using VoNR. There are still areas where I would drop signal but those were areas where I'm certain the only carrier available was U.S. Cellular since they still have a ton of macros that they're the only tenant on. The U.S. Cellular merger won't add much to T-Mobile's spectrum coffers there; they'll increase 600MHz from 20MHz to 30MHz, gain another 10MHz of AWS, and acquire the rest of the 24GHz band, but they'll gain a ton new sites to bolster their rural coverage in this area and make it pretty much the best in the region.  — — — — — I also mapped Dish while down there. Dish's doesn't have much spectrum in Pitt County, they only have 5MHz n71, 25MHz n70 and 5MHz n29. This lack of spectrum combined with what is pretty much a skeleton/license protection network meant that in most cases I was only on 1-2 bars of n71 indoors and while outdoors I wasn't seeing speeds nearly as good as I get in NYC. While directly in front of a site I could get over 300Mbps but in most cases while out and about I wasn't seeing over 100Mbps. In fact, at my hotel I was only able to get about 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up on n71. Maybe as they densify I'll see more consistently high speeds but their lack of spectrum will remain a huge bottleneck much like it was for T-Mobile pre-Sprint merger. — — — — — AT&T and Verizon are the only carriers with small cells in Greenville. Verizon has a significantly larger deployment than AT&T though, with AT&T having it along some roads where they have weaker coverage while Verizon seems to be using them for added capacity Uptown and especially around ECU. They started being installed around 2019 but none of them have 5G as far as I can tell, only LTE. AT&T also has C-band and DoD deployed on every site in the city, giving me speeds in the range of 350-400Mbps in most areas. — — — — — Here are some photos of small cells in Greenville.  
    • Just checked and found a 12MB Google Play System update ready to download.    Still October 1 for the date after however. 
    • Looks like my little area finally has some decent mobile connectivity. Still have a few dead spots on both tmo and firstnet... https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10549791800  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...