Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

Stringing up wires is not not the same as building multiple parallel roads.

Apparently, stringing up multiple wires is objectionable to shareholders and building multiple towers is objectionable to municipalities. So, yes, it is similar. Try again.

 

And if your idea is so doable then we'd see it done in at least one country. Like Belgium at least

Who said my "idea" was doable? We should have reasonable universal healthcare in this country. That is not doable either -- because of certain industrial political factions.  But it has been done in other countries.

 

First?  First!  Who cares?  The US could be the first country to have a nationalized telecom infrastructure.  It would make sense.  Other countries are not comparable in geographic size, population, population density, and wealth.

 

Also, please solve your double posting problem. Maybe it is your T-Mobile IP address.  Staff is tired of fixing the chronic issue for you.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NIMBY fights like this aren't particularly new.

 

Another one involving Verizon is occurring locally here now - http://boycottverizonwexford.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Verizons_Federal_Lawsuit_against_Wexford_County.pdf 

 

They typically get shot down, because there's usually not legitimate claim to deny them. And even if there was, they usually aren't presented/filed properly.

Page not found

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, stringing up multiple wires is objectionable to shareholders and building multiple towers is objectionable to municipalities. So, yes, it is similar. Try again.

 

 

Who said my "idea" was doable? We should have reasonable universal healthcare in this country. That is not doable either -- because of certain industrial political factions. But it has been done in other countries.

 

First? First! Who cares? The US could be the first country to have a nationalized telecom infrastructure. It would make sense. Other countries are not comparable in geographic size, population, population density, and wealth.

 

Also, please solve your double posting problem. Maybe it is your T-Mobile IP address. Staff is tired of fixing the chronic issue for you.

 

AJ

I have latest version of tapatalk can't do more than that.

 

For example, Sweden is very left in taxation social attitudes welfare etc. so if Europe isn't even discussing telecom nationalization you gotta accept it's not gonna happen anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Page not found

 

Oh, sorry. Didn't notice they had hotlink protection setup.

 

http://boycottverizonwexford.com/ (scroll down, click "View Lawsuit").

 

In that particular situation, Verizon did everything right, and the residents complaints are either outright lies, or completely silly.

 

It's very likely Verizon win the lawsuit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry. Didn't notice they had hotlink protection setup.

 

http://boycottverizonwexford.com/ (scroll down, click "View Lawsuit").

 

In that particular situation, Verizon did everything right, and the residents complaints are either outright lies, or completely silly.

 

It's very likely Verizon win the lawsuit.

What's a valid reason for rejecting a tower?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are the better questions. In this country, how long will it take private industry to invest in such crucial nationwide fiber network(s)? Will short term focused, increase my wealth quickly shareholders ever allow it?

 

Does the market actually demand nationwide fiber to all citizens? I'll be honest and say I don't know. Maybe most people want easier access. It's not a problem where I live, so if that wasn't the case perhaps I would feel differently. I am a federal emoloyee (I work in govt budget/finance policy), so I see how awful we do at many things. Some things the government does very well, and this could very well be one of them.

 

It's important to remember that a company like Sprint or Verizon have a #1 priority, and that is shareholder value. At some point the market will very likely dictate more prevalent fiber, and shareholder value will decline until they invest in that. But if the government took over that, it certainly might speed it up. But you'd probably piss off a lot of political donators ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry. Didn't notice they had hotlink protection setup.

 

http://boycottverizonwexford.com/ (scroll down, click "View Lawsuit").

 

In that particular situation, Verizon did everything right, and the residents complaints are either outright lies, or completely silly.

 

It's very likely Verizon win the lawsuit.

This is the funniest part of their complaint, IMO:

  • Detract from the rural character of the area
  • Ruin what is currently a pristine night sky

 

-Anthony

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question about AWS-3 spectrum.  The main AWS-3 spectrum of interest being auctioned is 1755-1780 MHz and 2155-2180 MHz (not counting the unpaired blocks).  Can someone explain why LTE Band 10 only consists of 1710-1770 MHz and 2110-2170 MHz.  Why doesn't Band 10 include the frequency range of 1770-1780 MHz and 2170-2180 MHz  I know the FCC is planning to auction the 1770-1780 MHz and 2170-2180 MHz spectrum as a single 10x10 block according to FierceWireless.  I don't think it would make sense to make an entire new LTE band just to support the 10x10 block. Was this a typo on the 3GPP's part?

 

 

 

The AWS-3 auction will have two sub-bands, each with its own band plan:
  • One of the sub-bands consists of one unpaired 5 MHz block (1695-1700 MHz) and one unpaired 10 MHz block (1700-1710 MHz), licensed in Economic Area (EA) geographies.
  • The other sub-band consists of paired spectrum. It includes one 5x5 MHz block (1755-1760 and 2155-2160 MHz) licensed in Cellular Market Area (CMA) geographies, and two 5x5 MHz blocks (1760-1765 and 2160-2165 MHz, and then 1765-1770 and 2165-2170 MHz) licensed in EA geographies. And finally there is one 10x10 MHz block (1770-1780 and 2170-2180 MHz) licensed on an EA basis.

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/fcc-sets-rules-105b-aws-3-auction-t-mobile-dish-denied-request-split-spectr/2014-07-24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question about AWS-3 spectrum. The main AWS-3 spectrum of interest being auctioned is 1755-1780 MHz and 2155-2180 MHz (not counting the unpaired blocks). Can someone explain why LTE Band 10 only consists of 1710-1770 MHz and 2110-2170 MHz. Why doesn't Band 10 include the frequency range of 1770-1780 MHz and 2170-2180 MHz I know the FCC is planning to auction the 1770-1780 MHz and 2170-2180 MHz spectrum as a single 10x10 block according to FierceWireless. I don't think it would make sense to make an entire new LTE band just to support the 10x10 block. Was this a typo on the 3GPP's part?

 

 

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/fcc-sets-rules-105b-aws-3-auction-t-mobile-dish-denied-request-split-spectr/2014-07-24

Band 10 will no be used. A new band will be created for aws1+aws3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 10 will no be used. A new band will be created for aws1+aws3

 

Oh ok...that makes sense.  Oh yeah I guess on further research it is being used in Latin America.  I guess they run AWS in a similar range which is why I got confused.  I guess that LTE band process won't be done until the auction is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question about AWS-3 spectrum.  The main AWS-3 spectrum of interest being auctioned is 1755-1780 MHz and 2155-2180 MHz (not counting the unpaired blocks).  Can someone explain why LTE Band 10 only consists of 1710-1770 MHz and 2110-2170 MHz.  Why doesn't Band 10 include the frequency range of 1770-1780 MHz and 2170-2180 MHz  I know the FCC is planning to auction the 1770-1780 MHz and 2170-2180 MHz spectrum as a single 10x10 block according to FierceWireless.  I don't think it would make sense to make an entire new LTE band just to support the 10x10 block. Was this a typo on the 3GPP's part?

 

 

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/fcc-sets-rules-105b-aws-3-auction-t-mobile-dish-denied-request-split-spectr/2014-07-24

 

 

Band 10 will no be used. A new band will be created for aws1+aws3

 

 

Oh ok...that makes sense.  Oh yeah I guess on further research it is being used in Latin America.  I guess they run AWS in a similar range which is why I got confused.  I guess that LTE band process won't be done until the auction is over.

Does anyone know if the FCC will require it to all be under one band like 600?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if the FCC will require it to all be under one band like 600?

 

Not sure but I think it would only be in the best interest for everybody to have just a single AWS LTE band class. That way it would be easier for the carriers to just add that 1 LTE band and have coverage for the entire AWS range. I hate all these obsolete LTE band classes which have constraints.  The 600 MHz better be a single LTE band class as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity does anyone happen to have a generated map of what tmobiles LTE coverage will look like once 300 pops are hit? I've seen sprints and their roaming agreement but I would like to see what T-Mobile will look like.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the funniest part of their complaint, IMO:

 

Yep. And I think that line is even better with context. From their own website :

 

"AT&T already owns and operates an existing tower very close to that site"

"[Verizon's tower would] ruin what is currently a pristine sky"

 

Apparently, when AT&T builds a tower, it's just one part of their "pristine sky", but if Verizon builds a tower in the same spot, it "ruins" both the sky and the rural charm.

 

:rolleyes:

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity does anyone happen to have a generated map of what tmobiles LTE coverage will look like once 300 pops are hit? I've seen sprints and their roaming agreement but I would like to see what T-Mobile will look like.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No because T-Mobile hasn't said where the coverage expansion will be, and probably never will until they start expanding.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity does anyone happen to have a generated map of what tmobiles LTE coverage will look like once 300 pops are hit? I've seen sprints and their roaming agreement but I would like to see what T-Mobile will look like.

AT&T claimed to hit 300m POPs w/ LTE four months ago (September 2014). In theory, it could be comparable coverage to AT&T back at that time.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/att-hits-milestone-early-covers-300-million-pops-lte/2014-09-04

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL - I hope this was sort of a joke, but funny either way.

it was but i also tried to make a point that its stupid to block any cell towers as there are also people who cant get broadband at home and may be forced to use some wireless ISP.

 

i also stated that just because verizon wants to build cell towers does not mean that other service providers cant come along in the future and also add their own equipment and that they are just screwing users of any wireless company.

 

Its like here in lima we have the refinery and you can see the smoke and fire from it for more than 10 miles into the country. i have never heard anyone bitch or moan "oh it makes the area look bad" or "it makes the night sky cloudy" no one gives a crap because it serves a purpose just like new cell towers would. 

 

EDIT: sorry off topic a bit will try and not derail this thread more.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.technobuffalo.com/2015/01/15/t-mobiles-new-simply-prepaid-plans-cap-your-lte-data/

 

Watchu guys this about this Article?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The author is clueless. This is exact same thing tmobile does with postpaid plans: high speed bucket then get slowed down. Nothing new.

 

The 8mbps is new and it's same policy as cricket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The author is clueless. This is exact same thing tmobile does with postpaid plans: high speed bucket then get slowed down. Nothing new.

 

The 8mbps is new and it's same policy as cricket.

What can anyone really do with 8mb, my real question would be is why is TM, limiting their customers and it's 4G bandwidth?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.technobuffalo.com/2015/01/15/t-mobiles-new-simply-prepaid-plans-cap-your-lte-data/

 

Watchu guys this about this Article?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Milan03 had some good comments about it (that I don't necessarily agree with but were well thought out) on HowardForums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who needs more than 8mbps? As long as it is consistent, that should be the cap. Frankly it drives me nuts when I see someone online bragging on using their Sprint connection has their home connection and using 100GB+ probably downloading illegal material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...