Jump to content

What really is VoLte?


Recommended Posts

Takes voice, digitally encodes it, then packs it up into individual IP packets. Skype, Vonage, most PBX/call center systems, etc all use this technology.

 

VoLTE is using the built-in Quality of Service support to ensure voice packets get priority, along with all the signaling for setup/teardown of calls, dialing, etc. IIRC, it's part of the LTE-Advanced spec but others can give more specific info.

 

 

Legacy networks tended to divide voice traffic from data traffic and put them on separate channels, often circuit switched*. This is true for both the telephone and cellular networks, though the situation is actually really complicated.

 

* in modern terms circuit switched is less distinct from a routed IP network, it basically just means the "circuit" has bandwidth reserved and the routing fixed at time of setup, whereas IP is more of a moment in time QoS and packets can dynamically re-route. Even that's not a fully accurate summary of a complex question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That depends on where you live.

 

In the cities, VoLTE will be a better tech. In rural areas, I wouldn't be running so quick to dump GSM, WCDMA/HSPA+, or CDMA1X/EV-DO. It's going to be a while, probably in 3GPP Release 12, before some of the problems with LTE propagation and call handoffs get solved.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So whats gonna be better?

 

That's a loaded question and people have differing views around here.

 

 

What is certain right now is everyone world-wide has pretty much agreed to a single global LTE standard and that standard's voice support has coalesced around VoLTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VoLTE is "better" in the sense that phone calls will be cheaper, because carriers won't need dedicated frequency space for voice traffic on towers, and can use the same technology to handle voice traffic as they can for data traffic, which will probably reduce per-minute pricing even more. The disadvantages relate to signal robustness (LTE's signal characteristics are better tuned for high-density urban areas than CDMA-1X or GSM were) and the general issues associated with a new technology (working out the bugs).

 

Basically it's the same transition Sprint has gone through from Nextel Direct Connect (basically circuit-switched) to Sprint Direct Connect (QChat is SIP VoIP + quality-of-service + Qualcomm special patented magic to make the shutdown/connect more responsive). Having said that if anything VoLTE is less technically challenging than QChat, since people making phone calls can deal with connect/disconnect latency much better than walkie-talkie services can - people expect a phone call to take 20-30 seconds to be connected, while "walkie talkie" services are supposed to connect in milliseconds and so people start throwing things, complaining to customer service, and canceling their accounts when it takes much longer. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody know what the bit rate will be for VOLTE? Just curious.

 

According to this article: http://lteuniversity.com/get_trained/expert_opinion1/b/nishithtripathi/archive/2012/09/27/volte-characteristics-a-brief-overview.aspx

 

Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec with eight modes uses 12.2 kbps, and AMR wideband with nine modes will use 12.65 kbps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks I know much more than I did before, and the VoLte sounds good. So when will it be released?

 

That's a bit up in the air, Sprint is going towards 1X Advanced for now which provides increased coverage and capacity, and since VoLTE still has some maturity issues some carriers including Verizon have put off the process for a little while. From my understanding there is some serious battery drain issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...