Jump to content

Qualcomm Pico cells


Recommended Posts

Snazzy music but this stuff is really cool.

 

With TD-LTE and picos it seams Sprint has the tools to keep unlimited alive.

 

They will always have the tools to keep unlimited alive, but if they start having a network that will draw people in, they might try and increase prices to take advantage of this and make profit (which they haven't done in a while)... I would like to see them keep unlimited, but its all psychology. Few consumers really need unlimited, or even a very high gigabyte limit, and would pay for it if they really needed it. I have seen so many people that have unlimited plans with verizon and are upset that they had to give up their unlimited data when upgrading, but they use less than 1GB/mo... So its just worrying that they will go over, not that they would ever really need more than X amount/ month. If sprint put a high limit like say 10GB/mo than throttled down to 3G speeds, most people would never even get close, but it would eliminate the highest usage customers. They could still offer a fully unlimited plan, just not unlimited data on the lower tiers.

 

Back on topic for the thread, these pico cells are interesting, but would likely only be used in dense urban areas... which will hopefully be covered by Clearwire TDD-LTE at ~100Mb/s. I love the idea of the pico cells for high usage areas or low signal areas, but I am more interested in expanded coverage that will come with LTE on 800MHz. I have many areas in the country that I drop calls, or I cannot get service in a house. This is more important to me, but I know there are many more people that will be affected by the pico cells.

 

I also remember some people saying that large housing communities were having problems because there were no towers close by and no way to put them closer because of zoning and land being privately owned. Here I would hope that these pico cells could be deployed and make these areas much better.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Did some more exploring tonight. Saw n77 on both my USM and Visible SIMs, but never for long enough to take a screenshot, let alone do a speedtest. VZW's coverage maps are *massively* overstated for n77, at least here. Had to go pretty far north to even get those glimpses. Finding T-Mobile n41 was miles easier.
    • Just figured out this is a waste of time. US Mobile and Verizon lock the eSim to the emei while T-Mobile only uses it to see that you have a capable phone, like Red Pocket does with physical sims (although RP does keep track of what phone you are using it on with the emei.)  So @Trip was right in this case on liking physical sims.
    • Verizon has a reputation for being frugal with MVNOs. After looking around, I also decided US Mobile was my best option. People have gotten C band on it.  Hoping for esim for my S21 Ultra.  No luck so far.  Red Pocket does not claim Verizon 5g, although they say Soon!(TM).  I do see some 5g with it. Typically MVNOs are deprioritized, thus I am reluctant to claim truly getting top speeds with one.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...