Jump to content

Sprint's 4th Quarter and Full Year 2012 Earnings Released


Recommended Posts

Posted
I have to go back and listen later once the audio archive is up, but I think Hesse said Sprint was the number 1 seller of the Galaxy SIII. I find that very surprising if true.

 

When you consider the EVO issues, the lack of a lot of flagship devices for the first few months the GS-3 came out, and all of the promotions Sprint has had with get one free and the like, I wouldn't be too surprised if Sprint was the number 1 GS-3 seller in the U.S.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Posted
I have to go back and listen later once the audio archive is up' date=' but I think Hesse said Sprint was the number 1 seller of the Galaxy SIII. I find that very surprising if true.[/quote']

 

Sprint had run some if the best deals on the GS3 of any carrier. The bogo promo on black friday, amazon's penny sale, 49 cents at sams, $49 all over back before+around around christmas, constant $99 or less pushes at best buy. I helped my uncles fam upgrade to gs3's on verizon back around christmas and nowhere could I find verizon gs3's priced as aggressively on average as sprint. Sprint embraced it as a flagship while verizon and att chose to just add it to the stable.

  • Like 5
Posted

Was there anything mentioned or any questions asked about the Clearwire acquisition and/or 2.5GHz TD-LTE?

Posted

Was there anything mentioned or any questions asked about the Clearwire acquisition and/or 2.5GHz TD-LTE?

 

No, basically it was all "no comment until the acquisition is completed".

  • Like 1
Posted

When you consider the EVO issues, the lack of a lot of flagship devices for the first few months the GS-3 came out, and all of the promotions Sprint has had with get one free and the like, I wouldn't be too surprised if Sprint was the number 1 GS-3 seller in the U.S.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

 

Sprint had run some if the best deals on the GS3 of any carrier. The bogo promo on black friday, amazon's penny sale, 49 cents at sams, $49 all over back before+around around christmas, constant $99 or less pushes at best buy. I helped my uncles fam upgrade to gs3's on verizon back around christmas and nowhere could I find verizon gs3's priced as aggressively on average as sprint. Sprint embraced it as a flagship while verizon and att chose to just add it to the stable.

 

Makes sense. I guess I'm just used to thinking that Verizon and ATT would always be able to outsell sprint on a given phone model since they're twice the size. I wonder if this gives Sprint more sway with Samsung when discussing gsIV, V, etc.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

 

 

Makes sense. I guess I'm just used to thinking that Verizon and ATT would always be able to outsell sprint on a given phone model since they're twice the size. I wonder if this gives Sprint more sway with Samsung when discussing gsIV, V, etc.

 

It probably helps. :tu:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 2
Posted

Honest question -- does anyone here own Sprint stock?

 

I'm considering a buy - and have been for a while - and earnings calls like this with the robust Q&A at the end really have me thinking that in 12-18 months, this is going to be a great stock to own. Buy low, hold, etc.

Posted

Honest question -- does anyone here own Sprint stock?

 

I'm considering a buy - and have been for a while - and earnings calls like this with the robust Q&A at the end really have me thinking that in 12-18 months, this is going to be a great stock to own. Buy low, hold, etc.

I do. if u can I say buy. just because it's guaranteed to be at $7.30 when Softbank buys its stake from some shareholders if you choose to sell at that time
Posted

Honest question -- does anyone here own Sprint stock?

 

I'm considering a buy - and have been for a while - and earnings calls like this with the robust Q&A at the end really have me thinking that in 12-18 months, this is going to be a great stock to own. Buy low, hold, etc.

 

I do. I bought in back in September when the stock was bottoming out at about 2 bucks a share. Timed it well, since the stock nearly tripled and then the softbank news came out. The stock price has pretty much plateaued since then. But, I'm a buy and hold kind of guy anyway.

 

We're not talking a huge stake either. I had a couple hundred bucks in a roth ira that were doing nothing so I bought like 60 shares at the time.

Posted

I do. I bought in back in September when the stock was bottoming out at about 2 bucks a share. Timed it well, since the stock nearly tripled and then the softbank news came out. The stock price has pretty much plateaued since then. But, I'm a buy and hold kind of guy anyway.

 

We're not talking a huge stake either. I had a couple hundred bucks in a roth ira that were doing nothing so I bought like 60 shares at the time.

I'm kicking myself for not getting in when it was in the low $2's.

 

I've got a few hundred laying around in my USAA account, so now would seem like a good time to hop on board the Yellow Train to Greenbackville!

Posted

 

243k+- "wholesale and affiliate" customers" were lost in 4th quarter 2012. Anybody know what affiliate or wholesale agreement held that many customers?

 

 

Went back and read the earnings call transcript. The wholesale loss was also related to the FCC's lifeline program. Looks like some of their wholesale customers also provide lifeline service and had to go back and eliminate inactive accounts.

Posted

I do. if u can I say buy. just because it's guaranteed to be at $7.30 when Softbank buys its stake from some shareholders if you choose to sell at that time

 

It's more complicated than that....not all the shares will be purchased at $7.30.....some of them will be converted to shares in the new sprint at I believe $5.25 - those shares will also be more dilute than the current one. The effective price works out to around 5.70 (I believe) which is why the stock price has largely plateaued.

 

I'm not an investment guy (an engineer, though I do own sprint stock) but I wouldn't expect to see significant movement in the stock until after the sale completes. That said, if it dips down to 5.40-5.50 range I will probably buy more stock, otherwise I intend to wait until closer to the softbank deal completing.

  • Like 1
Posted

It's more complicated than that....not all the shares will be purchased at $7.30.....some of them will be converted to shares in the new sprint at I believe $5.25 - those shares will also be more dilute than the current one. The effective price works out to around 5.70 (I believe) which is why the stock price has largely plateaued.

 

I'm not an investment guy (an engineer, though I do own sprint stock) but I wouldn't expect to see significant movement in the stock until after the sale completes. That said, if it dips down to 5.40-5.50 range I will probably buy more stock, otherwise I intend to wait until closer to the softbank deal completing.

 

You bring up valid points but also there is no guarantee that the Softbank deal will close. I think it's very unlikely that it wouldn't but the possibility still exists. IF that were to fall through, I think the stock price would tank.

Posted

I wonder if this means that Sprint will still try to push for tri band LTE phones for its flagship phones this year. I really hope so. I think it would be a dumb move if Sprint didn't do that. Offering only 1900 MHz LTE phones in 2013 would be a disaster since the Wimax customers like myself from 2011 renew our contracts. that puts more stress for the next 2 years on only the 1900 MHz band since customers typically renew their phones every 2 years. All the 2012 LTE customers only have 1900 MHz LTE support.

 

I am glad to hear that 800 MHz LTE deployment will begin in Q4 2013.

Posted

I agree about Sprint needing to have Tri band LTE phones this year. My upgrade eligibility is in June and if they don't have a tri bank LTE phone by then, I will just wait. It will be tough to wait, but I would rather wait a month or two if that means I will have tri band.

Posted

Went back and read the earnings call transcript. The wholesale loss was also related to the FCC's lifeline program. Looks like some of their wholesale customers also provide lifeline service and had to go back and eliminate inactive accounts.

 

That's a program I'd like to see end. It's riddled with fraud and abuse.

  • Like 1
Posted

If Sprint isn't starting NV2.0 until 4Q, then I would assume the next iPhone this year and most of the Spring phone releases won't have LTE800 support. Oh well, just longer waiting time.

Posted

Well LTE-800 should go quick as hell as it's plug in a card, turn it on, and go test. Quite a bit different than the huge checklist they have to fulfill today.

Posted
Well LTE-800 should go quick as hell as it's plug in a card, turn it on, and go test. Quite a bit different than the huge checklist they have to fulfill today.

 

In Ericsson markets it will require an RRU install too.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

In Ericsson markets it will require an RRU install too.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Ericsson markets can't catch a break! I kid, I kid.

  • Like 3
Posted

In Ericsson markets it will require an RRU install too.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

What about Alcatel Lucent and Samsung markets?

Posted

iirc, Robert mentioned that samsung rrus can do both smr and pcs so they only need two rrus at the bare minimum.

Posted

 

What about Alcatel Lucent and Samsung markets?

 

I'm not certain about AlcaLu, but I believe their RRU's can do LTE and CDMA on the same unit. I know Samsung can. And currently Ericsson cannot. However, I hear that Ericsson is working on a new RRU for deployment than can do both LTE and CDMA from the same RRU.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Well you officially fried my brain. Many of these topics are well beyond my very rudimentary amateur knowledge.. this has my head spinning even more than usual. When someone figures it out, just let me know what I need to do with the app! 😂
    • Confusingly, there are two different types of Cell IDs, the NR Cell ID (NCI) and the Local Cell ID, which I will call the LCID from here on out. From my understanding, @Trip is trying to get the LCID from the NCI but the same gNB is showing up for multiple sites in the app. Some background for those that don’t know about NCIs (NR Cell ID) and how they relate to gNBs and LCIDs. Just like the E/GCI which is comprised of the eNB + LCID with the eNB denoting the site, the NCI is comprised of the gNB + LCID with the gNB denoting the site. A major difference is that the eNB is a fixed number of bits in the E/GCI but the gNB can vary between 22-32 bits (out of 36) in the NCI and there is nothing transmitted which tells you what the length is. The reason for the mentioning LTE sites is that Verizon’s gNB numbering scheme in most of the USA is based upon the sites eNB (using the rules I mentioned) and a 22-bit gNB. Additionally, their LCIDs start at 25 and increment by compinations of 16 and 1. Basically, it is common to see LCID sets of 25/26/27, 41/42/43, and 57/58/59. Looking at Trip’s data and some other data from the area, they are not following the format used in the rest of the USA.  From what I can tell, they are using a 29-bit or 30-bit gNB (that gives LCIDs that follow Verizon’s standard patterning). 29-bit shares the same gNB across the two locations, while 30-bit splits the two sets: 18504107674 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 26 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 26 (30-bit) 18504107690 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 42 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 42 (30-bit)  18504107691 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 43 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 43 (30-bit)  18504107706 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 58 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 58 (30-bit)  18504107707 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 59 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 59 (30-bit) 18504107738 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 90 (29-bit) or 289126683 + CLID 26 (30-bit)  18504107739 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 91 (29-bit) or 289126683 + CLID 27 (30-bit)  If true, this is a problem for SignalCheck and other mapping apps because this means they are using at least two different gNB lengths depending on the location in the USA.
    • Yeah I can confirm that the status bar is updating correctly and as often as the main app!  Great to have that back after so long. Waiting on the app to pick up the 5G data.  I'm on AT&T and I find that it only reports the 5G signal data a fraction of the time.  Once I can get it to pop back up I'll send a report with the LTE RSRP showing up in the status bar instead of the NR RSRP. I am not sure if it is new behavior with the Beta because I had it set to just show the Band since I couldn't display the band and signal at the same time. Edit:  Sent a diagnostic and here's a screenshot:
    • Yes, for various reasons the beta mapping project was limited to S4GRU sponsors at launch. It's still a work in progress but I have added a few users as it has evolved. I am inclined to leave it as-is for now -- it's not completely off-limits to discuss here (especially if there's an outage), but with so many posts I just try to keep discussions organized. RAvirani handles the map server and he monitors the other thread closer.   I might be confused, but are we talking apples and oranges here? My interpretation was Trip is talking about NR cells on different sites sharing cell IDs as far as the app is concerned, while the other comments are about LTE to NR cell ID calculations?
    • I hope this is true!! The Android development team did claim this bug was fixed several months ago, and it is typical for it to take several releases before changes are included. I was on the Android beta until I got my Pixel 9, now I am back on the public releases. With each monthly update, I have optimistically checked this icon and been disappointed. This would be fantastic to get back!   Could you send some diagnostic reports when you see this please? It is new behavior with QPR Beta 3?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...