Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Slimboutit

What's the fastest that you've seen a tower upgraded?

Recommended Posts

We had a site in the NOLA market go from legacy panels to network vision and broadcasting LTE in less than a week.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We had a site in the NOLA market go from legacy panels to network vision and broadcasting LTE in less than a week.

 

I want that crew to come to Providence :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We had a site in the NOLA market go from legacy panels to network vision and broadcasting LTE in less than a week.

 

Was that one of the ones near the MB Superdome? ...for the Super Bowl?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Was that one of the ones near the MB Superdome? ...for the Super Bowl?

 

No, in the Westbank area. Would have been meaningless for most tourists. As it was not covering the French Quarter, airport, or anything in between.

 

Just a site that was probably waiting on RRUs. Cabinets and backhaul were ready.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is pretty fast alright. There is a site near me that has had panels up for more than 35 days now without broadcasting LTE lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is pretty fast alright. There is a site near me that has had panels up for more than 35 days now without broadcasting LTE lol.

 

Many of ours have been sitting that long. Some back in October, November, etc. They look cool though. In my general area most of them are not touched. Wish the crews would come back. I guess Tampa stole them! ;)

 

I am sure some other areas have some stragglers sitting longer. I wish there was a way for us to know why the various sites sit. Would ease the mind instead of just guessing it is backhaul.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres a tower that has boxes sitting outside, but everytime I go back by it.. There is alwasy new sprint NV boxes on the metal frame where all of the NV hardware will go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is pretty fast alright. There is a site near me that has had panels up for more than 35 days now without broadcasting LTE lol.

thats nothing..there is this site with panels attached ready fo more than 4 months and no LTE yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thats nothing..there is this site with panels attached ready fo more than 4 months and no LTE yet

 

There's one NE of Hutchinson Kansas that is closing in on 9 months. But its being finished up now. It was waiting on backhaul.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There's one NE of Hutchinson Kansas that is closing in on 9 months. But its being finished up now. It was waiting on backhaul.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Couldn't remember off hand where that was at. Thanks for posting! Now people can see why things could be tomorrow or in 9 months when the mythical "switch" is flipped.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And this is not just a Sprint issue. The Verizon site next door to my house went almost 10 months from panel/mw radome install until LTE went live on it.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My local site has had panels installed and back haul is ready. Waiting on cabinets. :P hopefully not too much longer.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When a site is inspected and accepted for 4G...does that mean that the backhaul is ready at the site as well??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When a site is inspected and accepted for 4G...does that mean that the backhaul is ready at the site as well??

 

Yes. The 4G has to be connected to new backhaul in order for it to pass inspection. However, if 3G is not yet accepted, it might not be connected to the new backhaul at the very same site.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Yes. The 4G has to be connected to new backhaul in order for it to pass inspection. However, if 3G is not yet accepted, it might not be connected to the new backhaul at the very same site.

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Ok thanks for the clarification. Glad the backhaul is ready and not like these other sites lol. I was just asking because the site has been 4G accepted since the end of December but hasn't broadcasted an LTE signal yet from my observations. Guess they might be waiting to finish the 3G inspections first.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whats the backhaul look like?

 

I thought about asking this also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. The 4G has to be connected to new backhaul in order for it to pass inspection. However, if 3G is not yet accepted, it might not be connected to the new backhaul at the very same site.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

What would keep an accepted site from broadcasting LTE for long periods of times like we have seen on some sites?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought about asking this also.

I would love to know what the backhaul looks like xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is pretty fast alright. There is a site near me that has had panels up for more than 35 days now without broadcasting LTE lol.

A few towers out in the sticks here have had new panels and RRUs since December 2011, haha. It's taken that long to get backhaul installed. Still waiting for those towers to be lit up, as it looks like microwave backhaul was installed a couple weeks ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What would keep an accepted site from broadcasting LTE for long periods of times like we have seen on some sites?

 

Could be several factors, such as they are waiting to get more lte sites nearby accepted. Could also be on their to do list to make active but haven't got to it yet. Also could the the 4g switch isn't ready for that site yet. Once they have coverage for that tower on sprint.com and its not broadcasting lte, call sprint and tell them (be polite) and then they will do a ticket on it to make it active as the person who supposed to make it active accidently missed that site. (May take a few weeks to month from that point)

 

Sent from my SSGS3 using Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • as of today band 25 being reduced on Sprint side, EARFCN 8321 is 5 MHz vs 8290 10 MHz here in LES. But when I forced roam to T-mobile it still 10 MHz band 2 EARFCN 750.
    • I sent mine back a few weeks ago. My power went out for 2 seconds and it went back to search mode. If the pebble gets disconnected from power for any amount of time, it needs to be completely re-configured. Decided it wasn't worth the hassle. I have wifi calling so I get phone calls and if I don't get texts,....depending on who it is from that's actually a bonus.
    • Just did some quick adding and 70% of the US population is in the largest 114 US MSAs. If Dish covered every MSA above 475k population (so, everything from Lafayette, LA on up), and service stopped completely outside MSA borders, they'd hit their 70%. That's while covering none of places as large as Reno, NV. Oh, and if you cover the San Juan, PR MSA, you can just hit the top 110 other MSAs, down to Pensacola, FL (so, everything with >= 500k population). Now, I fully expect Dish to omit some MSAs in the top 114 in favor of others that are closer to their footprint, or have more Boost Mobile user concentration, but this isn't a ridiculously huge lift...and is why Dish is saying they'll be building out only 15k cell sites by 2023...and they'll have help from T-Mobile as TMo casts off a bunch of redundant sites, many of which would love to immediately get a new tenant.
    • Thing is, building a coverage focused network to cover 70% of the US population using 600 isn't *that* expensive. It's the capacity play that's expensive. You need capacity if you have a ton of customers, which 10MM isn't. Alltel had 12 million customers when Verizon bought them, and covered a larger area than Dish will need to. If you spend $5 billion building a network for, say, 15 million customers, and don't have to subsidize those customers, that's not a huge outlay in the scheme of things.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...