Jump to content

Justice department looking to delay Sprint/Softbank merger


supert0nes
 Share

Recommended Posts

Looks like it's pick on Sprint day.

 

http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/29/3928968/us-justice-department-asks-fcc-to-defer-sprint-softbank-merger

 

 

The US Justice Department has requested that the FCC defer a planned merger between Sprint and SoftBank, according to Bloomberg, a move that would grant the government more time to review the proposal. The deal was first announced in October, with Sprint and Japanese carrier SoftBank publicly stating they hoped to have it approved by mid-2013. A deferment from the FCC could significantly hold up that process and push off any closure of the $20.8 billion acquisition.

 

 

Though it hasn't voiced outright opposition to such a merger, rival AT&T issued a statement highlighting the fact that the buyout would grant "Japan's largest wireless companies control of significantly more U.S. wireless spectrum than any other company" — a statistic it urged regulators to take into consideration during the review process. Approval of the merger is important to Sprint's future plans; as just one example, part of the deal will see $8 billion in equity financing go toward the carrier's 4G LTE buildout in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is surprising to me. There is no antitrust element to this deal. This is a win for consumers. Even consumers on other carriers would benefit from competition. *sigh*

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't see how a Japanese company having a stake in the US market is somehow a bad thing, like AT&T seems to be implying. Besides the whole "yellow terror" idea that Asians are coming to ruin us all (see also: every Chinese company is evil and Huawei is stealing our info even though we have no proof), well, I don't understand the problem. They still have to abide by US laws for selling products in the US, so...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is surprising to me. There is no antitrust element to this deal. This is a win for consumers. Even consumers on other carriers would benefit from competition. *sigh*

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Come on, this is AT&T we're talking about. Did you expect any less?

 

 

what irks me the most about this is AT&T's insinuation that they will be at some disadvantage compared to Sprint due to having less spectrum. Yet no one is complaining to the DOJ about VZW/AT&Ts near monopoly on sub 1ghz spectrum.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is surprising to me. There is no antitrust element to this deal. This is a win for consumers. Even consumers on other carriers would benefit from competition. *sigh*

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Now I see that it is not an antitrust review by the DOJ, but a national security review. I did expect something like this could occur. Although this will likely slow things down, I cannot imagine any issues with a Japanese company. Unless they have some direct connection to the Chinese.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This deal represents the largest single capital investment by a Japanese firm in the US, it is a good sign when forign companies want to invest in the US for an untold number of reasons. If the DOJ is stupid enough to hold up/kill this deal it will be a sign to companies all over the world that if they make to big a capital investment in the US they will face problems and that will have negative effects far beyond the wireless industry (of course most will be unseen so no one will care). There is no national security issue that would warrant the DOJ holding up this by any sane judgement, Japan has been an allied nation for near 70 years and a huge trading partner. This is a troubling sign for the US economy in general.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It turns out that the DOJ filed the same exact deal in the Tmo/Metro PCS merger. This is much ado about nothing. The DOJ has not made any comments yet that make it sound like they are concerned. They are just doing their due diligence.

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I see that it is not an antitrust review by the DOJ, but a national security review. I did expect something like this could occur. Although this will likely slow things down, I cannot imagine any issues with a Japanese company. Unless they have some direct connection to the Chinese.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

It will get approved but they need to detail what steps sprint/softbank will do in the security agreement.

 

Softbank does have a lot of chinese telecom equipment installed - this was one of the ways that they were able to undercut the traditional telecoms in japan (that used NEC and other japanese infrastructure).

 

Back in october, Bloomberg did note that Huawei might come up...

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-18/huawei-may-surface-in-u-s-review-of-softbank-sprint-deal.html

 

“This deal will probably end up getting approved but with a very detailed national security agreement.”

About 10 percent of capital expenditure by Tokyo-based Softbank goes to Huawei and ZTE for equipment, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is surprising to me. There is no antitrust element to this deal. This is a win for consumers. Even consumers on other carriers would benefit from competition. *sigh*

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

The antitrust aspect in my mind is the fact that Sprint is trying to use funds that have yet to come in to purchase a company. By the DOJ wants Sprint not to act on new matters before finishing old ones. Also the DOJ could be worried about a foreign firm having so much power in an American cell phone carrier!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The antitrust aspect in my mind is the fact that Sprint is trying to use funds that have yet to come in to purchase a company. By the DOJ wants Sprint not to act on new matters before finishing old ones. Also the DOJ could be worried about a foreign firm having so much power in an American cell phone carrier!

 

Sprint doesn't have to use Softbank funds to pay for Clearwire. It has borrowed billions to pay for Network Vision. It can use those funds. Additionally, the money from Softbank is a loan. It is legal. And that is not an issue.

 

The DOJ has made no such claims that Sprint needs to finish old matters before new matters. That's absurd. Where did you get such an idea?

 

Also, the DOJ cannot be worried about a foreign firm owning 70% of an American wireless carrier. T-Mobile is completely foreign controlled. Should the DOJ stop the purchase of MetroPCS, an American company, that will be 100% owned by a foreign company? There is no legal precedent to stop this except for national security concerns.

 

I'm not sure where your hostility is coming from. This purchase is a win for everybody, except for possibly AT&T and Verizon.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DOJ inquiry seems to be nothing to make a big fuss about, as DT went though the same thing when they bought Voicestream years ago. I do wonder how far this deal would go if it was China Mobile. I personally don't have any issues with such a deal happening, but then again, I'm not senator, regulatory body, corporation, or a lobbyist.

 

The new T-Mobile/MetroPCS entity will be 76% owned by DT, with the rest owned by MetroPCS and their shareholders.

 

In all, I, an american consumer only see good things coming from the approval of this investment.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with the DOJ investigating, but if foreign ownership was/is an issue, why approve Voicestream to T-Mobile?

 

Also, the Huawei comparison doesn't hold for me. Huawei is owned by the Chinese government, SoftBank by an investor who went to college in the US and is very friendly to US interests. It's like comparing apples to oranges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will get approved but they need to detail what steps sprint/softbank will do in the security agreement.

 

Softbank does have a lot of chinese telecom equipment installed - this was one of the ways that they were able to undercut the traditional telecoms in japan (that used NEC and other japanese infrastructure).

 

Back in october, Bloomberg did note that Huawei might come up...

 

http://www.bloomberg...print-deal.html

 

 

Well There will not be at this point be any Huawei equipment in the Network Vision project... Potentially depending on what happens with the Clearwire Spectrum they could be pressed into service since Clear has already done some business with them and has some network elements from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well There will not be at this point be any Huawei equipment in the Network Vision project... Potentially depending on what happens with the Clearwire Spectrum they could be pressed into service since Clear has already done some business with them and has some network elements from them.

 

Yup, the whole point is to setup a framework for the future. Not just promise me today, buy Huawei/ZTE tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Update just showed up for both of my phones. So far I don't notice any difference, LTE TA is still reporting as 0, I was hoping the new routine might fix that. I sent a diag report from both phones in case you need any of that info. I'll let you know in a day or so if its crashing as frequently or not. 
    • A new SignalCheck Pro beta release is rolling out now, and should become available on Google Play shortly! Some notable changes: New "swipe to refresh" -- flick down on the main screen, and the data will "refresh" -- I put this in quotes because it will *not* force the modem to be polled (that's unfortunately not possible), but it will 'wake up' the app and display the latest information if for some reason your screen did not automatically update. I am still working on improving this. New cell identification methods for Android 12+ devices -- new routines are available in Android 12 and this is my first attempt at implementing them. I have not seen any changes positive or negative on my Pixel 6, but hopefully someone sees improvements. I will continue exploring these methods and adding new features as I get them working. Location service auto-restart -- if your location has not changed in 10 minutes, the background location service should restart itself. This is a work in progress that I intend to optimize during beta testing. Missing/invalid TAC values included in web uploads -- this will need some testing, because I can't replicate it myself. The option to log cells with missing TAC must be enabled for this to have an impact. Feedback welcome as always!
    • Another converted keep site: Sprint eNB 9436 -> T-Mobile eNB 895067 (40.60777246698788,-74.16199692361377) Looks like they're using the FFVV-65A-R2-V1 here, as well!   Edit: Also, I know this technically isn't NYC, but here's a Jersey City conversion. Not 100% sure on either eNB. Sprint eNB 105863 -> T-Mobile eNB 876452 (40.72265196811989,-74.08804945021805)
    • More confirmations incoming! T-Mobile eNB 880561 (40.74176835140717, -73.88364207139453)   Sprint eNB 6191 / T-Mobile eNB 880065 (40.71339007010928, -73.85695387371624) Confirmed this site but was unable to get a photo because the antennas are set back from the edge of the building. I could see them from super far away but there wasn't a good area for me to pull over and snap a pic.   Sprint eNB 6189 / T-Mobile eNB 877995 (40.71183894845567, -73.83529788316665)   Sprint eNB 253741 / T-Mobile eNB 875537/875538 (40.70170960850086,-73.83302208208359)   Sprint eNB 79912 / T-Mobile eNB 875989 (40.86349197342981, -73.923456682535) — — — — — T-Mobile eNB 880536 in the Bronx isn't a Sprint conversion but rather, T-Mobile changed the eNB when they upgraded the site. The nearest Sprint site at 40.8150405321864, -73.93010756429787 still has all of its antennas up and is literally within spitting distance of two other T-Mobile sites in an area that's very industrial as opposed to residential or commercial so a keep site isn't particularly necessary. You can see on Cellmapper that the old eNB stopped broadcasting about two days after the new eNB went live.  — — — — — Also wanted to add that I spotted AT&T C-band antennas quite a bit in both Queens and the Bronx. I would expect a summer C-band launch announcement from them because they're moving FAST. At least in my area, it seem like they're upgrading at a faster pace than Verizon is. Some more pics: AT&T eNB 116408 / T-Mobile eNB 42887 in Woodhaven. This one is interesting because T-Mobile upgraded this site but in the process didn't put any Ericsson n41 antennas. There are just two of the RFS antennas that we normally get.   AT&T eNB 112047, bad pic but the arrows on the billboard are pointing right at the C-band antenna lol   — — — — — Last edit I promise: I noticed T-Mobile submit a permit to convert the keep site I found in Staten Island (Sprint eNB 75141). I 100% guessed it's location since I connected to it literally 4.5 miles across the water while inside a building. Glad to see I was right!
    • Support for the -1 TAC is good to go now, so I'm ready whenever you are!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...