Jump to content

Hey Verizon, is Clearwire spectrum worthless or not?


supert0nes

Recommended Posts

I was reading that and I noticed "Most importantly, to promote long-term competition, encourage auction participation, and prevent the further consolidation of spectrum below 1 GHz, the Commission should adopt rules that prohibit any licensee from acquiring more than a certain percentage of spectrum below 1 GHz, applied on a market-by-market basis. As we have noted elsewhere, adopting a spectrum-based cap equal to one-third of the available commercial mobile spectrum below 1 GHz would give bidders reasonable assurances that they can meaningfully compete for spectrum in a geographic area without the risk of only one or two of the largest carriers commandeering the entire market. Increasing the potential for successful participation will lead to increased participation by competitive carriers and ultimately increased revenue."

 

Watch out AT&T and Verizon?

 

I still question such a strategy as the change from 1900mhz propagation to 800 propagation is not a simple 4x multiplication in coverage area that can also be applied to 600 spectrum. 600 will be significantly better, and not all sub-1ghz spectrum is the same.

 

For example, I read a university publication on the potential benefits that CDMA 450 could have on American rural areas which stated that CDMA 450 covers (edit: fixed) 2.7 times the area of CDMA 850! It would be a mistake to consider these two spectrum bands in the same spectrum screening of capping 1ghz spectrum!

 

Cell%20area%20vs%20freq.png

 

Source: http://tier.cs.berkeley.edu/docs/wireless/cdma450.pdf

 

I propose a more mathematically or perhaps empirically based system that considers the raw propagation areas (maybe build out cost for a given area) that better quantifies the true propogation value of spectrum as opposed to a simple greater than 1ghz or less than 1ghz system. This approach would see all spectrum fall under the spectrum screen to be judged fairly, and would better approximate the value of spectrum near what would otherwise be the 1ghz threshold.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Edited by lynyrd65
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yet another "Carrier" move: T-Mobile users have only now discovered sneaky change made in May
    • Went to Hurricane Harbor again this past weekend, this time testing Verizon and T-Mobile. In my testing, Verizon is now the fastest carrier, at least on the Hurricane Harbor sector. Despite it being pretty overcast on Saturday with temperatures in the mid-80's the park was at full capacity.  Verizon had 160MHz of n77 and T-Mobile now has 160MHz of n41. On LTE I was seeing speeds in the range of 50-100Mbps while T-Mobile's LTE on was completely swamped, barely crossing 3Mbps. While both carriers only have a single high capacity sector (facing Great Adventure, Verizon benefits from having CBRS deployed on all sectors. This is an extra 60-100MHz of capacity that T-Mobile doesn't have. Maybe when T-Mobile gets around to deploying their C-band we'll see a boost in speeds again to be more competitive with Verizon. On the 5G side of things, T-Mobile's speeds were just over half that of Verizon.  That said, neither carrier was slow and I had zero issue using Xbox Cloud Gaming on T-Mobile despite their weaker upload speeds and higher ping.  
    • I think the newer ones have signal bars on them. I took a photo of one in Red Hook a month or two ago that had the same design.
    • Well well, looks like we found one of the two Link5G towers that might actually have 5G. Notice anything different? This one has the same signal bars icon that the pole mounted 5G oDAS units have. It’s in Chinatown at East Broadway and Forsyth St. It’s impossible to tell what carrier it is, though.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...