Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 Sprint LTE variant


WiWavelength

Recommended Posts

No SWBYPS either.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even want to know what that means.

 

If you are under 25 and/or have never lived in Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas, or Missouri, then you are probably not in on the joke.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If you are under 25 and/or have never lived in Texas' date=' Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas, or Missouri, then you are probably not in on the joke.

 

AJ[/quote']

 

Over 25 but never lived in any of those states, so I am definitely not in on the joke.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over 25 but never lived in any of those states, so I am definitely not in on the joke.

 

But I have given you enough info that, with a little detective work, you could probably figure it out.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But I have given you enough info that' date=' with a little detective work, you could probably figure it out.

 

AJ[/quote']

 

I will look it up when I get back to Visalia later tonight.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No WiFi or Bluetooth? That's kinda odd.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner

 

Think that's actually common. Not sure, not too much of a bluetooth user. Only use it in the car sometimes with the OBD2 plug in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No WiFi or Bluetooth? That's kinda odd.

 

digiblur means no simultaneous Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. Go back and look at his "acronym."

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, Sprint requires that you do a 2 year contract if you're going to add a tablet w/cellular access to your account, even if you pay full retail price for the device.

 

Good luck shooting yourself in the foot there, Sprint... You could be making more money off me if you'd let me activate the device on your network without a darn contract.

Edited by doug526
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, Sprint requires that you do a 2 year contract if you're going to add a tablet w/cellular access to your account, even if you pay full retail price for the device.

 

Good luck shooting yourself in the foot there, Sprint... You could be making more money off me if you'd let me activate the device on your network without a damn contract.

 

Although I'm not much appreciating your tone, I do agree that Sprint requiring a two year contract to provide service on a device you own outright is ridiculous. It was nice to be able to activate my Nexus 4 on Tmo with no contract. They need to come up with a better plan to add additional devices that someone purchases somewhere else.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Of course, Sprint requires that you do a 2 year contract if you're going to add a tablet w/cellular access to your account, even if you pay full retail price for the device.

 

Good luck shooting yourself in the foot there, Sprint... You could be making more money off me if you'd let me activate the device on your network without a darn contract.

AFAIK if you pay full retail you don't sign a contract... If you sign one, you get $100 off the MSRP. I can check on this tomorrow at work for you to be sure, but I'm pretty sure we've sold tablets off-contract before at our store.

 

Edit: whoops, this post is from months ago. Oh well, let me know if you want me to still check.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...