Jump to content

Dish Network's Spectrum Holdings/Plan


Deval

Recommended Posts

With all this talk, or no talk, of Dish putting in a bid for Clearwire, the question comes up, what exactly is Dish planning on doing with their AWS-4 spectrum?

 

What would be their possible applications for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dish retains its AWS-4 spectrum, look for it to follow a LightSquared-esque model -- another carrier hosts the 40 MHz of spectrum on that carrier's platform, and Dish sells wholesale offload access to any/all comers.

 

On the other hand, Dish could be serious about grabbing Clearwire and its BRS/EBS spectrum. Then, Dish would have enough bandwidth in most/all markets to offer a true triple play package. Satellite video. Wireless broadband. Wireless home phone.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dish retains its AWS-4 spectrum, look for it to follow a LightSquared-esque model -- another carrier hosts the 40 MHz of spectrum on that carrier's platform, and Dish sells wholesale offload access to any/all comers.

 

On the other hand, Dish could be serious about grabbing Clearwire and its BRS/EBS spectrum. Then, Dish would have enough bandwidth in most/all markets to offer a true triple play package. Satellite video. Wireless broadband. Wireless home phone.

 

AJ

 

The problem with the Lightsquared model is that there is no ecosystem in place to deploy it. Would they deploy it as set-top boxes to offer home internet?

 

If you consider tower spacing, they would have to rely on Clearwire to deploy the spectrum for them, or in the LS model, Sprint to deploy it. What happens to those areas where PCS barely has coverage, AWS-4 will be the same, if not slightly worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The problem with the Lightsquared model is that there is no ecosystem in place to deploy it. Would they deploy it as set-top boxes to offer home internet?

 

If you consider tower spacing, they would have to rely on Clearwire to deploy the spectrum for them, or in the LS model, Sprint to deploy it. What happens to those areas where PCS barely has coverage, AWS-4 will be the same, if not slightly worse.

 

And LTE requires a higher signal strength, so the broadcast area shrinks even more. If they had a higher power receiver that could mount on a dish, it could extend the range a bit though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with the Lightsquared model is that there is no ecosystem in place to deploy it. Would they deploy it as set-top boxes to offer home internet?

 

If you consider tower spacing, they would have to rely on Clearwire to deploy the spectrum for them, or in the LS model, Sprint to deploy it. What happens to those areas where PCS barely has coverage, AWS-4 will be the same, if not slightly worse.

 

Yes, to be clear, I am talking about Dish pursuing a "hotspot" offload model and/or home broadband model, neither of which requires complete coverage to be viable.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, to be clear, I am talking about Dish pursuing a "hotspot" offload model and/or home broadband model, neither of which requires complete coverage to be viable.

 

AJ

 

Ahhh ok. But it would have to be deployed somehow, you know? For example, Sprint's 3G inbuilding penetration in Queens is abysmal, even with the tower spacing. If Dish were to deploy a solution there for home broadband, they would either use Sprint's tower spacing, or end up deploying their own towers to fill gaps. Otherwise how could they offer the service?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And LTE requires a higher signal strength, so the broadcast area shrinks even more. If they had a higher power receiver that could mount on a dish, it could extend the range a bit though.

 

Yes but on the transmit side, you would have to have panels deployed somewhere, with sufficient backhaul. I can see them making a more rural play, where customers are restricted to satellite internet. Perhaps over microwave backhaul?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yes but on the transmit side, you would have to have panels deployed somewhere, with sufficient backhaul. I can see them making a more rural play, where customers are restricted to satellite internet. Perhaps over microwave backhaul?

true, but if you have the spectrum and more access to backhaul in the metro... You might as well offer it. It might draw more customers looking for a package deal. Especially the dish TV customers getting soaked on internet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

true, but if you have the spectrum and more access to backhaul in the metro... You might as well offer it. It might draw more customers looking for a package deal. Especially the dish TV customers getting soaked on internet.

 

I agree, I guess I'm just curious as to why they would want to do a wireless play if no one has the proper tower spacing in place for their spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I guess I'm just curious as to why they would want to do a wireless play if no one has the proper tower spacing in place for their spectrum.

 

You are basing that assessment on mobile use, not fixed use. But fixed use is an entirely different animal. Far more gain/power available.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are basing that assessment on mobile use, not fixed use. But fixed use is an entirely different animal. Far more gain/power available.

 

AJ

 

Let's consider the fixed use role. You would still need broadcast equipment no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's consider the fixed use role. You would still need broadcast equipment no?

 

Yes you still would, but the tower spacing is not as critical, you can just turn up the power just as long as you don't interfere. Fixed broadband is really the best use of the AWS-4 spectrum and the EBS/BRS spectrum. You can use it for OTT video to stationary/ nomadic devices, VOD, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, with a fixed solution, you can place the receiver/router in an ideal location of your dwelling, like a window facing the tower. TaosNet, a WiMax ISP here in New Mexico, installs little receivers to the eave of your home, or in your window. Even with high frequencies, it works superbly for a home ISP solution. Even in adobe structures.

 

I can picture DISH having little WiMax/TD-LTE receivers built into their dishes and brought into your home via Coax to a router, just like your TV service. With that, it doesn't matter at all that EBS/BRS doesn't penetrate into your home. It wouldn't need to.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, with a fixed solution, you can place the receiver/router in an ideal location of your dwelling, like a window facing the tower. TaosNet, a WiMax ISP here in New Mexico, installs little receivers to the eave of your home, or in your window. Even with high frequencies, it works superbly for a home ISP solution. Even in adobe structures.

 

I can picture DISH having little WiMax/TD-LTE receivers built into their dishes and brought into your home via Coax to a router, just like your TV service. With that, it doesn't matter at all that EBS/BRS doesn't penetrate into your home. It wouldn't need to.

 

Robert

 

Agreed, came in here to say this. You can even see this with some of the hotspots Clear offers. MUCH different than an EVO4G for reception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh ok. But it would have to be deployed somehow, you know? For example, Sprint's 3G inbuilding penetration in Queens is abysmal, even with the tower spacing. If Dish were to deploy a solution there for home broadband, they would either use Sprint's tower spacing, or end up deploying their own towers to fill gaps. Otherwise how could they offer the service?

 

For home wireless internet you can install fixed receivers which have vastly higher gain and are far more directional than a smart phone antenna.

 

It's how local WISPs around my cabin manage decent WiMax coverage even with 3 GHz+ frequencies. (Always "just" out of range :( but now that I have DSL, idc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Has anyone checked Verizon n77 in areas with more than 100MHZ active? This spectrum has been fully available since August of last year.  Of course they are not typically using SA.
    • I updated my other s21 ultra factory unlocked to the latest firmware... It behaves like the S24 Ultra n38 or n41 depending on 80 or 100MHz or their nr- arfcn.
    • I see everything correct. The two ARFCN's you mentioned earlier and they idenitify as n-41.  using 4.832b SCP. Only using one TM SIM.
    • I posted this in the Nebraska Premier thread last week, but just wanted to share in this thread the progress that T-Mobile has made in filling in the great coverage gap known as Nebraska. Between late last year and this year, they have added 28 new expansion sites filling in the coverage hole, plus 11 Sprint site conversions in eastern Nebraska and far western Iowa. Notably, in the last month n41 coverage was added on over a dozen expansion sites in western Nebraska that were added to the network last year. For comparison, here is the very first map that I created in October of 2022 after we noted expansion sites outside of Sprint conversion in Lincoln and Omaha. It doesn't show any western parts of the state, but just know there was nothing besides roaming coverage and a little B12 coverage leaking down from South Dakota to the west of Valentine, NE.
    • Sent a copy of my DB in an e-mail just now.  Couldn't leave the house today but can hopefully get a screenshot when I'm out on another cell site tomorrow.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...