Jump to content

Dish Network's Spectrum Holdings/Plan


Deval
 Share

Recommended Posts

With all this talk, or no talk, of Dish putting in a bid for Clearwire, the question comes up, what exactly is Dish planning on doing with their AWS-4 spectrum?

 

What would be their possible applications for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dish retains its AWS-4 spectrum, look for it to follow a LightSquared-esque model -- another carrier hosts the 40 MHz of spectrum on that carrier's platform, and Dish sells wholesale offload access to any/all comers.

 

On the other hand, Dish could be serious about grabbing Clearwire and its BRS/EBS spectrum. Then, Dish would have enough bandwidth in most/all markets to offer a true triple play package. Satellite video. Wireless broadband. Wireless home phone.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dish retains its AWS-4 spectrum, look for it to follow a LightSquared-esque model -- another carrier hosts the 40 MHz of spectrum on that carrier's platform, and Dish sells wholesale offload access to any/all comers.

 

On the other hand, Dish could be serious about grabbing Clearwire and its BRS/EBS spectrum. Then, Dish would have enough bandwidth in most/all markets to offer a true triple play package. Satellite video. Wireless broadband. Wireless home phone.

 

AJ

 

The problem with the Lightsquared model is that there is no ecosystem in place to deploy it. Would they deploy it as set-top boxes to offer home internet?

 

If you consider tower spacing, they would have to rely on Clearwire to deploy the spectrum for them, or in the LS model, Sprint to deploy it. What happens to those areas where PCS barely has coverage, AWS-4 will be the same, if not slightly worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The problem with the Lightsquared model is that there is no ecosystem in place to deploy it. Would they deploy it as set-top boxes to offer home internet?

 

If you consider tower spacing, they would have to rely on Clearwire to deploy the spectrum for them, or in the LS model, Sprint to deploy it. What happens to those areas where PCS barely has coverage, AWS-4 will be the same, if not slightly worse.

 

And LTE requires a higher signal strength, so the broadcast area shrinks even more. If they had a higher power receiver that could mount on a dish, it could extend the range a bit though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with the Lightsquared model is that there is no ecosystem in place to deploy it. Would they deploy it as set-top boxes to offer home internet?

 

If you consider tower spacing, they would have to rely on Clearwire to deploy the spectrum for them, or in the LS model, Sprint to deploy it. What happens to those areas where PCS barely has coverage, AWS-4 will be the same, if not slightly worse.

 

Yes, to be clear, I am talking about Dish pursuing a "hotspot" offload model and/or home broadband model, neither of which requires complete coverage to be viable.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, to be clear, I am talking about Dish pursuing a "hotspot" offload model and/or home broadband model, neither of which requires complete coverage to be viable.

 

AJ

 

Ahhh ok. But it would have to be deployed somehow, you know? For example, Sprint's 3G inbuilding penetration in Queens is abysmal, even with the tower spacing. If Dish were to deploy a solution there for home broadband, they would either use Sprint's tower spacing, or end up deploying their own towers to fill gaps. Otherwise how could they offer the service?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And LTE requires a higher signal strength, so the broadcast area shrinks even more. If they had a higher power receiver that could mount on a dish, it could extend the range a bit though.

 

Yes but on the transmit side, you would have to have panels deployed somewhere, with sufficient backhaul. I can see them making a more rural play, where customers are restricted to satellite internet. Perhaps over microwave backhaul?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yes but on the transmit side, you would have to have panels deployed somewhere, with sufficient backhaul. I can see them making a more rural play, where customers are restricted to satellite internet. Perhaps over microwave backhaul?

true, but if you have the spectrum and more access to backhaul in the metro... You might as well offer it. It might draw more customers looking for a package deal. Especially the dish TV customers getting soaked on internet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

true, but if you have the spectrum and more access to backhaul in the metro... You might as well offer it. It might draw more customers looking for a package deal. Especially the dish TV customers getting soaked on internet.

 

I agree, I guess I'm just curious as to why they would want to do a wireless play if no one has the proper tower spacing in place for their spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I guess I'm just curious as to why they would want to do a wireless play if no one has the proper tower spacing in place for their spectrum.

 

You are basing that assessment on mobile use, not fixed use. But fixed use is an entirely different animal. Far more gain/power available.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are basing that assessment on mobile use, not fixed use. But fixed use is an entirely different animal. Far more gain/power available.

 

AJ

 

Let's consider the fixed use role. You would still need broadcast equipment no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's consider the fixed use role. You would still need broadcast equipment no?

 

Yes you still would, but the tower spacing is not as critical, you can just turn up the power just as long as you don't interfere. Fixed broadband is really the best use of the AWS-4 spectrum and the EBS/BRS spectrum. You can use it for OTT video to stationary/ nomadic devices, VOD, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, with a fixed solution, you can place the receiver/router in an ideal location of your dwelling, like a window facing the tower. TaosNet, a WiMax ISP here in New Mexico, installs little receivers to the eave of your home, or in your window. Even with high frequencies, it works superbly for a home ISP solution. Even in adobe structures.

 

I can picture DISH having little WiMax/TD-LTE receivers built into their dishes and brought into your home via Coax to a router, just like your TV service. With that, it doesn't matter at all that EBS/BRS doesn't penetrate into your home. It wouldn't need to.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, with a fixed solution, you can place the receiver/router in an ideal location of your dwelling, like a window facing the tower. TaosNet, a WiMax ISP here in New Mexico, installs little receivers to the eave of your home, or in your window. Even with high frequencies, it works superbly for a home ISP solution. Even in adobe structures.

 

I can picture DISH having little WiMax/TD-LTE receivers built into their dishes and brought into your home via Coax to a router, just like your TV service. With that, it doesn't matter at all that EBS/BRS doesn't penetrate into your home. It wouldn't need to.

 

Robert

 

Agreed, came in here to say this. You can even see this with some of the hotspots Clear offers. MUCH different than an EVO4G for reception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh ok. But it would have to be deployed somehow, you know? For example, Sprint's 3G inbuilding penetration in Queens is abysmal, even with the tower spacing. If Dish were to deploy a solution there for home broadband, they would either use Sprint's tower spacing, or end up deploying their own towers to fill gaps. Otherwise how could they offer the service?

 

For home wireless internet you can install fixed receivers which have vastly higher gain and are far more directional than a smart phone antenna.

 

It's how local WISPs around my cabin manage decent WiMax coverage even with 3 GHz+ frequencies. (Always "just" out of range :( but now that I have DSL, idc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Sure.. or it can just leave it blank or zero, whatever is easiest for you.
    • Added, and 2 more estimated sites: T-Mobile eNB 876480. Looks like its located at (40.62210996397784, -73.97627312607108), as the tower looks like a Sprint setup. T-Mobile eNB 875632. Both this site and Sprint eNB 9022 seem to be located at (40.61640722407462, -73.96985178560767).
    • Many of these sites I am uploading are for sites that do not exist, yet.  Although, I suppose I could go into NR only mode every time I connect to a new site, and then switch back, allowing all the TAC NR trails that occur to now have a home. Ideally, I would love to ne able to add the TAC's myself.  I have the NR Trails CSV file downloaded, and I see all the TAC-less NR entries.  Is there any way I can edit and manually upload them myself?  Maybe create a portal for such an upload?  Or at least give me a way to create at least one manual entry for every new site? Robert
    • Could we send the TAC as -1 if it’s invalid? Then, if there’s and existing site that matches the other info, I could match the web data entry up with it (despite the TAC being absent). 
    • Mine has been enabled.  And they show up in my device logs with the TAC null. Robert
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...