Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Previously network.sprint.com only showed Sprint corporate upgrades. There was never any updates shown for Shentel areas which is how I first came to realize Shentel was Shentel and not Sprint. I now see Shentel upgrades are showing on the network site which is very nice to see. Am I the last one to realize this!?!? Also, the "data speed upgrades" definitely coincide with the LTE updated towers.

Posted

Previously network.sprint.com only showed Sprint corporate upgrades. There was never any updates shown for Shentel areas which is how I first came to realize Shentel was Shentel and not Sprint. I now see Shentel upgrades are showing on the network site which is very nice to see. Am I the last one to realize this!?!? Also, the "data speed upgrades" definitely coincide with the LTE updated towers.

 

I use the Sprint network site to locate Shentel sites for our maps. I only get a list of sites upgrading or upgraded from our Shentel source with site names/numbers. So these maps have been invaluable to marry the two together.

 

Robert

Posted

I use the Sprint network site to locate Shentel sites for our maps. I only get a list of sites upgrading or upgraded from our Shentel source with site names/numbers. So these maps have been invaluable to marry the two together.

 

Robert

 

Oh wow, I'm assuming this was ever since Sprint released the "revamped" site?

Posted

Oh wow, I'm assuming this was ever since Sprint released the "revamped" site?

 

No. It's been since about 6-8 weeks. Now if they would only show nTelos sites too. Maybe they will when they begin NV.

 

Robert

Posted

No. It's been since about 6-8 weeks. Now if they would only show nTelos sites too. Maybe they will when they begin NV.

 

Robert

 

Or the small swiftel in the Dakotas...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was it like only 1.2MB?  I had a tiny one last night but no date change as I was already on November here.
    • Nov 1 play system system update.
    • A new apartment building in my neighborhood is getting a 4G/5G DAS installed. No idea if it's going to be carrier agnostic or if it's going to be just for one carrier. The antennas they are using cover the full range of spectrum from 600MHz-4.9GHz so no telling by equipment alone. I noticed a ton of Cat6E ethernet being run in the garage a couple of days back and then I saw a guy running the ethernet through the ceiling yesterday and didn't think to ask what for until I noticed this antenna this morning mounted on a wall outside near the ramp but with nothing connected to it at the moment.     The garage attendant told me that the phones that are provided to them by the parking management company are on Verizon and they're the only carrier without coverage down there so the building management told them that they're "installing something to fix it". So as far as I know, this will work on Verizon but I'm curious to see who else will get a boost too. — — — — — Without exaggerating, I have mapped a new at least one new small cell on my way to work every day this week. I don't know who the regional network managers for NYC and Boston are, but other cities need to take a page from their book about small cell buildouts. And it's not just upgrades of existing small cells, it's new ones too. Not to mention pings near 10ms on all of them.
    • Yep, 562.51MB December 1 sec patch just found here tonight as well. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...