Jump to content
jeremyandrew

Network Vision/LTE - Western & Central Pennsylvania Markets (Lancaster, Scranton, Erie, State College, Williamsport)

Recommended Posts

Build is in full swing. Here's a shot or some ground mounted RRUs at a rooftop in State College.

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

uploadfromtaptalk1357758035974.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Build is in full swing. Here's a shot or some ground mounted RRUs at a rooftop in State College.

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

where in state college is this??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

where in state college is this??

 

N Atherton next to Wendys.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

N Atherton next to Wendys.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Great find, think it is the first find in the market!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great find, think it is the first find in the market!

 

 

There are several more in the area. I will be visiting ay least 6 sites in and around state college today.

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There are several more in the area. I will be visiting ay least 6 sites in and around state college today.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Awesome post what your find!

 

Sent from my EVO LTE using Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Awesome post what your find!

 

Sent from my EVO LTE using Forum Runner

 

I'll share what I can.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any idea when any of these sites will be up and testing. I assume they'll have LTE as soon as they are flipped on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any idea when any of these sites will be up and testing. I assume they'll have LTE as soon as they are flipped on?

 

At this time, I don't believe we have that information. However, if the market follows that pattern of other markets, you will likely only see 3G improvements for several weeks, up to a couple of month before LTE starts to go live on the upgraded sites. However, once a site has had 3G improvements, it is a fairly quick process to bring up LTE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any idea when any of these sites will be up and testing. I assume they'll have LTE as soon as they are flipped on?

 

Many of the sites in western and central PA will not initially have LTE as they are ground mounted. The city of Pittsburgh will, but it will be one of the last clusters completed. Now don't be dismayed, every site will have EVDO and sufficient backhaul for it to be very useable.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Many of the sites in western and central PA will not initially have LTE as they are ground mounted. The city of Pittsburgh will, but it will be one of the last clusters completed. Now don't be dismayed, every site will have EVDO and sufficient backhaul for it to be very useable.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

 

I completely forgot when I first read this that many of these sites didn't even have EVDO prior to this so that is very good news. Always annoyed me that pretty much the full length of I80 was 1XRTT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does ground mounted equate to no LTE? No 800mhz i can understand but LTE is very possible with ground mounted RRUs.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shentel even has a ground mounted site with LTE live in Mont Alto, PA using legacy panels and ground mount RRU's. Works quite well.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many of the sites in western and central PA will not initially have LTE as they are ground mounted. The city of Pittsburgh will, but it will be one of the last clusters completed. Now don't be dismayed, every site will have EVDO and sufficient backhaul for it to be very useable.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

You'd think they'd be chomping at the bit to get the upgrade finished and in-place. Verizon's had LTE in State College for 2.5 years and AT&T just flipped on LTE in State College last week. I can see what's coming but I must admit as a Sprint customer its getting rather hard to get excited about a company that always seems to be bringing up the rear but then again as of now there isn't even a Sprint Store in town either. The one at the mall went under after Christmas. Want service you have to drive to Altoona. Seems silly to me. I wonder if these guys are taking this market seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd think they'd be chomping at the bit to get the upgrade finished and in-place. Verizon's had LTE in State College for 2.5 years and AT&T just flipped on LTE in State College last week. I can see what's coming but I must admit as a Sprint customer its getting rather hard to get excited about a company that always seems to be bringing up the rear but then again as of now there isn't even a Sprint Store in town either. The one at the mall went under after Christmas. Want service you have to drive to Altoona. Seems silly to me. I wonder if these guys are taking this market seriously.

I think for the most part that sprint has been doing quite a good job at deploying LTE across the nation. Maybe not the fastest deployment Ive seen, but for a carrier who had the first "4G" network in the U.S(WIMAX), which really set sprint back a few steps, since LTE was being adopted by other carriers and WIMAX didnt seem like it could compete, and even after the whole WIMAX mess, sprint got back up and picked up momentum once again with their new LTE network. Give them time, and im sure you wont be dissappointed in what sprint does within the next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd think they'd be chomping at the bit to get the upgrade finished and in-place. Verizon's had LTE in State College for 2.5 years and AT&T just flipped on LTE in State College last week.

 

You can bet they are chomping at the bit. They want this to go as fast as possible, but an infrastructure overhaul of this scale take time, no matter how fast you think it should go. There are always unforeseen problems, as we have seen lately. If you take a look at the article that Robert posted on the wall today, you can see that Sprint is really wanting this project to go quickly, and they are doing everything they can to make that happen.

 

 

I think for the most part that sprint has been doing quite a good job at deploying LTE across the nation. Maybe not the fastest deployment Ive seen,

 

I challenge you to find another network of Sprint's scale that has committed to overhauling their entire network in just over 2 years. The difference is Sprint is allowing connections to each tower as it is complete, whereas other carriers wait until the entire region is complete before launching, which makes it seem like their rollout is quicker.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI - migrations are starting for Western PA later this month

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI - migrations are starting for Western PA later this month

I am still fairly new to this and i know this is a stupid question to ask.. What exactly is a migration? I think i have an idea but im not sure if im correct or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am still fairly new to this and i know this is a stupid question to ask.. What exactly is a migration? I think i have an idea but im not sure if im correct or not.

 

When you change from the legacy equipment to the new equipment, hence the name.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI, the first few clusters in Western PA are live. They are in Western ans South Eastern Erie county, Warren county, Bradford county and Allegany County Maryland(it's considered part of western PA)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI, the first few clusters in Western PA are live. They are in Western ans South Eastern Erie county, Warren county, Bradford county and Allegany County Maryland(it's considered part of western PA)

 

Thanks for the info. Allegany county, Md sure needed all the help possible. That is a very very hard area to cover properly due to the mountains. Do you know if the 800 service is operational yet?? If not, do you know the reason why it is not being activated locally??

They sure need 800 more than most areas. I hope this is not ground mount installs as they need the boost of top mount RRU's too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Thanks for the info. Allegany county, Md sure needed all the help possible. That is a very very hard area to cover properly due to the mountains. Do you know if the 800 service is operational yet?? If not, do you know the reason why it is not being activated locally??

They sure need 800 more than most areas. I hope this is not ground mount installs as they need the boost of top mount RRU's too.

 

All of the western pa market is GMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of the western pa market is GMO.

 

Yep. I've been to every one of the sites and they are definitely ground mounted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FYI, the first few clusters in Western PA are live. They are in Western ans South Eastern Erie county, Warren county, Bradford county and Allegany County Maryland(it's considered part of western PA)

 

Are you sure they are broadcasting? I had my brother check for 3g in fairview last weekend without success.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Are you sure they are broadcasting? I had my brother check for 3g in fairview last weekend without success.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

I'm positive of it, had to troubleshoot one of them yesterday. DO isn't available just yet, still waiting on additional backhaul, but it should be here shortly.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Akron, OH - Median download speed increased from 22.7Mbps to 30.8Mbps.  Baltimore, MD - Median download speed increased from 24.4Mbps to 32.8Mbps.  Charlotte, NC - Median download speed increased from 14.7Mbps to 22Mbps.  Des Moines, IA - Median download speed increased from 16.8Mbps to 23.8Mbps. Fort Meyers, FL - Median download speed decreased from 15.5Mbps to 8.6Mbps. Mobile, AL - Median download speed increased from 18Mbps to 29.9Mbps. 
    • Sprint can't afford to go private, they can't afford to buy back shares from stockholders, going private won't happen.  Either the merger will pass (60/40 chance at this point), if not Son will find a buyer for Sprint and take a loss (hello WeWork) and as a trader the way Sprint's shares are trading its almost as if market makers are already pricing in a merger failure.  Sprint would have to do some serious trimming off its balance sheet, sale portions of its network and subs, or even file Chapter 11.  I don't really see Sprint filing bankruptcy I've seen companies with worse earnings and survive.  Son just wants out of the U.S. wireless market and merging with T-Mobile is the fastest way to do so all while pitching this "5G for all" bs <--- I don't even have faith in T-Mobile post merger if it happens.  Sprint needs someone with deep pockets like Altice or another large cable company (and most certainly not Dish). 
    • Yes, some of you disagree with me.  That's to be expected.  Sprint sucks in some places.  But Sprint is not only great in my area, but they're actually the best.  And in most metro areas, they are perfectly usable.  But guess what?  T-mobile sucks in many places.  And I can tell you here in their home market, they're the worst carrier.  Verizon also stinks in places too.  I suppose if I lived in a crappy Sprint market, I'd go.  But I can tell you I see more and more people who leave Sprint and either come back or even if they don't, admit that the network wasn't as bad as they thought and there was a complete over dramatization in the disparity in networks.  Everybody's gotta do what's best for themselves.  And if leaving Sprint is best for you, I certainly wouldn't hold it against anyone.  I've seen many go over the years.  And I still sit here plugging away behind the keyboard.  But the one thing that won't continue is the overly negative drumbeat that's happening in this thread.  You all are starting to build off each other's negativity, causing the conversation to become one sided and pointless.  Don't want to hear ad infinitum the same droll negative grumblings.  Especially the same 'ol criticisms and Sprint can't be trusted.  Frankly, the drama is not true.  Sprint took longer, yes, but it did upgrade its network, and the performance is better.  And on the whole, it's better than its ever been.  So it cannot be said Sprint didn't do it.  They did. So let's stick to the thread discussion, which is the merger.  Not on the network performance on Lower Botswana Avenue and your thoughts on changing networks because of your block. Robert 
    • Boost founder has already said he would pay $2b for the brand back. 
    • Hi, Robert While I see your points, I respectfully disagree with some of them.  Properly managed, Sprint does have the resources to compete successfully.  But the key phrase is "properly managed", and that's where Sprint has shown critical weakness time and time again. Since Dan Hesse was screwed over in the Metro PCS debacle, and then dumped after Softbank took over, Sprint hasn't shown any signs of intelligent strategic management.  Tactically, they have tried hard to succeed, and have kept up with technology, and have tried to keep up with deployments.  But Softbank's refusal to provide capital (either directly or through 3rd parties), Claure's ham-handed cost cutting,  and Masa's tunnel-vision focus on merger have all combined to put Sprint in a desperate situation. So I agree with you that Sprint could compete in the future, but I think it is unrealistic to expect Masayoshi and Softbank to actually try to compete.  If the merger fails, I think that it is far more likely that Masa will basically dump Sprint just like he dumped Hesse, and loyal Sprint employees and the few remaining independent stockholders will be left swinging in the wind.  Sprint customers (I've been with Sprint for 20+ years) will also be hung out to dry.  I hope that I am wrong.  Actually, I hope the merger goes through, but if it doesn't, then I hope that I am wrong.  But I'm not counting on it.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...