Guest 503ducati Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 When I still had the original EVO 4G. Portland, Oregon @2:15PM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 When I still had the original EVO 4G. Portland, Oregon @2:15PM Wow. I've never exceeded 16Mbps on WiMax. That is admirable. Robert 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nahum365 Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 When I still had the original EVO 4G. Portland, Oregon @2:15PM Wowzers. I've never even seen over 4Mbps on my Clear hotspot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacinJosh Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Wowzers. I've never even seen over 4Mbps on my Clear hotspot. I've never seen over 10.5Mbps on my EVO Shift. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 503ducati Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Another user's fastest speeds: http://www.howardfor...G-amp-4G)/page7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etirkca Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 20+ wow Sent from mobile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesinclair Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Damn, never gotten higher than 8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nahum365 Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 Just pulled a nice 13.50 down and 3.76 up a Clear Voyager. Believe it or not, better then the 9.34 down and 1.47 up on my current Sprint LTE connection. Not bad. Ping is a bit high though- 80ms compared to 42 on LTE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iansltx Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Just pulled a nice 13.50 down and 3.76 up a Clear Voyager. Believe it or not, better then the 9.34 down and 1.47 up on my current Sprint LTE connection. Not bad. Ping is a bit high though- 80ms compared to 42 on LTE. Wow...never could pull that with my Voyager when I had it, even though I had perfect signal with low load. Maybe Clear has throttled such devices in the past and is now removing those caps? I had no problem getting 12-plus Mbps with the Clear Hub in the same location. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nahum365 Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Wow...never could pull that with my Voyager when I had it, even though I had perfect signal with low load. Maybe Clear has throttled such devices in the past and is now removing those caps? I had no problem getting 12-plus Mbps with the Clear Hub in the same location. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD It was plugged in via USB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXLINE Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 What is the max theoretical output of Sprint's Wimax? I thought I read somewhere that it was 18.5mbps with 10mhz channel but that obviously isn't true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilotimz Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 37/17 on 10mhz channels iirc. Problem is Clearwire never had the requisite backhaul for those kind of speeds and we've only been getting faster speeds because CW is prepping sites for TDD-LTE alongside decreases in wimax users. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iansltx Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 It was plugged in via USB. I have plugged in the Voyager via USB and didn't get any higher speeds than on WiFi. Then again, maybe the Mac drivers are poorer than the Windows one? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXLINE Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 37/17 on 10mhz channels iirc. Problem is Clearwire never had the requisite backhaul for those kind of speeds and we've only been getting faster speeds because CW is prepping sites for TDD-LTE alongside decreases in wimax users. So relatively close to the same as LTE? 10mhz is the same as 5x5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nahum365 Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 I have plugged in the Voyager via USB and didn't get any higher speeds than on WiFi. Then again, maybe the Mac drivers are poorer than the Windows one? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD I was actually using a Samsung Ultrabook. It wasn't mine, but the hotspot was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lynyrd65 Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 So relatively close to the same as LTE? 10mhz is the same as 5x5? 20mhz TDD has the same total bandwidth as 10x10 FDD however that 20mhz can be divided up asymetrically with varying downlink and uplink bandwidths like 15 x 5 mhz (adds up to 20). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 20mhz TDD has the same total bandwidth as 10x10 FDD however that 20mhz can be divided up asymetrically with varying downlink and uplink bandwidths like 15 x 5 mhz (adds up to 20). Not exactly. TDD stands for Time Division Duplex. The division between uplink and downlink is in time, not frequency. The entire carrier bandwidth is devoted to uplink, then downlink on an alternating basis. AJ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boosted20V Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Not exactly. TDD stands for Time Division Duplex. The division between uplink and downlink is in time, not frequency. The entire carrier bandwidth is devoted to uplink, then downlink on an alternating basis. AJ I assume there is some limit on how much time can be allocated to a single pathway? As in only 90% of the time can ever be diverted to downlink to keep checking if traffic has become available for uplink? Am I way off on that one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I assume there is some limit on how much time can be allocated to a single pathway? As in only 90% of the time can ever be diverted to downlink to keep checking if traffic has become available for uplink? Am I way off on that one? Yeah, the TDD allocation can be changed, though that is a configuration at the network level, as all TDD devices need to maintain a fairly precise synchronization to avoid transmitting while other TDD devices are receiving (and vice versa). If I recall correctly, the default TDD allocation that I have seen for WiMAX is roughly 40/60, uplink/downlink, not taking into the account the guard periods that must be inserted at each link transition. AJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawaiiD Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I got 15 mbps in Atlanta. Same in Honolulu. 15MB down was fastest I seen here Sent from my Coconut Wireless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwhittaker13 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 Fastest ive ever seen on my Evo 3D in Pittsburgh, PA was roughly 6-10 Mbps down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MophoManners Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Otherwise 21-22 x1.5 mbps every day.. Those where the days... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lynyrd65 Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Otherwise 21-22 x1.5 mbps every day.. Those where the days... HOW? Where?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MophoManners Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 By running a speed test, in Minneapolis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etirkca Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Otherwise 21-22 x1.5 mbps every day.. Those where the days... Is this even possible? I read earlier that the max down speed for wimax is under 40. Sent from my SPH-L700 using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts