Jump to content

Where to find number of customers per market?


Recommended Posts

And in terms of growth just in residents, Vegas is still growing at a massive pace, so subscriber growth is still continuing.

 

...until the desert rises up and swallows Las Vegas again.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...until the desert rises up and swallows Las Vegas again.

 

AJ

 

As fast as they are building, I don't see that happening anytime soon. I see it happening for Pahrump faster because our growth rate is almost stopped dead. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As fast as they are building, I don't see that happening anytime soon. I see it happening for Pahrump faster because our growth rate is almost stopped dead. :(

 

The rate of new construction is part of the problem. Las Vegas is an ill advised location for a city of that size. The ecosystem cannot support it without massive man made intervention efforts.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rate of new construction is part of the problem. Las Vegas is an ill advised location for a city of that size. The ecosystem cannot support it without massive man made intervention efforts.

 

AJ

 

Yeah, most people aren't allowed to have grass and trees in there yards anymore. And then the city thinks that they can convince the Nevada Division of Water Resources to allow Vegas to pipe into Pahrump and take our water from us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, most people aren't allowed to have grass and trees in there yards anymore. And then the city thinks that they can convince the Nevada Division of Water Resources to allow Vegas to pipe into Pahrump and take our water from us.

 

Not to mention they want to pump White Pine County dry. One of the wettest and prettiest places in Nevada. It would look as barren as Vegas in 5 years if they had their way.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention they want to pump White Pine County dry. One of the wettest and prettiest places in Nevada. It would look as barren as Vegas in 5 years if they had their way.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

I remember hearing about that too. And I think they were very close to getting their permits, but something happened, and they lost them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything in Louisiana? If you have BR, I'm curious how close I would be with my prediction. ATT - 50%, Verizon - 25%, Sprint - 10%, T-Mobile - 8%, the rest pre-paid

 

I would guess 70% AT&T, 15% VZW, 7% Sprint, etc..

 

Detroit's finest...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Figures AT&T would be number 1 in Chicago, kinda surprised Sprint is ahead of Verizon though. People around here seem very brand loyal towards AT&T, and I can't convince a single person to switch away either (even though they aren't that great around here!) and nobody likes Sprint (gee I wonder why?) too bad the "sheeple" are incredibly slow to figure out they are making a great comeback here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can just post this in Premier Sponsors, but what about Austin? I think it's probably AT&T, then Sprint, then TMobile, then Verizon, with TMobile pretty close to Sprint. But not completely sure.

 

I know in Fredericksburg it's something like Sprint, Verizon, AT&T, West Central Wireless (local), CricKet, TMobile. Sprint was the first to get us EvDO, as well as the first to get us LTE. Verizon will almost undoubtedly be next, followed shortly by WCW. SMR 1x will be a pretty big deal here since it will allow Sprint to compete on coverage with VZW (a lot of their own towers in good locations) and AT&T (850 license...WCW owns the other one). WCW is great if you stay in the area most of the time, but you can't get 3G without a contract and data roaming is on the order of 50 cents per meg. Ouch.

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I tried to post the full marketshare numbers, but I think my posts were eaten by my iPad when I tried to edit them.

 

Anyway, you can get the top 50 marketshare numbers by just googling for "Number of VZW subscribers (and other carriers) per market".

 

I published this year's numbers back in June elsewhere on the interwebs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I tried to post the full marketshare numbers, but I think my posts were eaten by my iPad when I tried to edit them.

 

Anyway, you can get the top 50 marketshare numbers by just googling for "Number of VZW subscribers (and other carriers) per market".

 

I published this year's numbers back in June elsewhere on the interwebs.

 

Sorry, we had to do some checking. Your posts are up and ready for viewing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...