Jump to content
rwhittaker13

Signal issues with the galaxy nexus

Recommended Posts

Well, as i have gotten a galaxy nexus at long last, ive noticed that other sprint phones have been constantly getting better signal than my phone has. For example, when i went to the sprint store, my phone varies from 1-2 bars in the store. When i would go over to any other sprint phones, they would have at least 3-5 bars. And this was more than just one different sprint phone that did it, it was every phone in the store that had a better signal than mine, except for the galaxy nexus at the store. It had the same signal strength as mine did.. Radio issue possibly??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, as i have gotten a galaxy nexus at long last, ive noticed that other sprint phones have been constantly getting better signal than my phone has. For example, when i went to the sprint store, my phone varies from 1-2 bars in the store. When i would go over to any other sprint phones, they would have at least 3-5 bars. And this was more than just one different sprint phone that did it, it was every phone in the store that had a better signal than mine, except for the galaxy nexus at the store. It had the same signal strength as mine did.. Radio issue possibly??

 

Did you look at the actual signal numbers? Or just the bars? There is nothing scientific about the bars.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you look at the actual signal numbers? Or just the bars? There is nothing scientific about the bars.

Yes, i have looked at the dBm values. At times, the difference between my value and other sprint phones values ranged from a 4 to 10 dBm difference. When one sprint phone would have a -93dBm signal strength, mine would be around -105 to -109dBm signal strength.. I can not figure out why this happens Edited by rwhittaker13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, i have looked at the dBm values. At times, the difference between my value and other sprint phones values ranged from a 4 to 10 dBm difference. When one sprint phone would have a -93dBm signal strength, mine would be around -105 to -109dBm signal strength.. I can not figure out why this happens

 

It is possible that the nexus has a slightly weaker radio... I have noticed slightly improved signal strength numbers and bars since going from the gnex to the gs3, but I have not noticed additional coverage area due to the "better" signal strength. There are a couple places that I occasionally visit that I would drop calls and/or have no signal with the gnex, and the GS3 behaves the same in those areas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the problem seems to be that the Galaxy Nexus uses an off brand VIA Telecom baseband for its CDMA2000 chipset. Honestly, this late in the game, I do not know why you would want to pick up a Galaxy Nexus.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get one because i don't want the bloatware that the other galaxies have..:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the problem seems to be that the Galaxy Nexus uses an off brand VIA Telecom baseband for its CDMA2000 chipset. Honestly, this late in the game, I do not know why you would want to pick up a Galaxy Nexus.

 

AJ

Because of my broken LG Viper, sprint said they would replace my phone with a different model and the galaxy nexus was the other model i could choose to replace the viper with, so i did. Not a bad phone really, it still lives up to its name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Galaxy Nexus has the weakest 1x/EVDO radio performance of all Sprint LTE devices I've tested. On par with one of the weakest devices of all time...the Samsung Epic 4G.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Galaxy Nexus has the weakest 1x/EVDO radio performance of all Sprint LTE devices I've tested. On par with one of the weakest devices of all time...the Samsung Epic 4G.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Full agreement there..

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

finally got something helpful....

 

Sometimes it helps to be a HAM radio licensee..:) I worked my way up to a level 3 escalation on the airave where i had sprint and airvana directly involved. It turns out there is a known issue with the airvana 2.5 and andriod LTE devices. the phones try to query the airvana for LTE which fails...the phone then de-registers from the airave and then recycles on 3g and connects. Things are fine until the phone tries to find 4G at the airave again..rinse repeat. This only affects the 2.5 AFAIK. The solution is to disable 4g and lock the phone into 3g when on the airave. I've also noticed the signal the 2.5 is throwing out is very hot. I live in a 2200 sqft house but i had to have them turn it down to 1500sqft to keep the rest of the phones from getting blasted off the air as well.(google receiver rf detuning). Airvana now has an active ticket on this inssue internally on their end as well...here's to hoping this will get fixed now. I've now got the reduced power and the 4G disabled on my GNEX. I'll report back with the results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well the issue has accelerated. my gnex now drops the airvana completely on a regular basis. it appears either sprint or the device itself keeps jacking the rf output up to high and that's blasting phones off the airvana again. What a piece of junk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to take a guess it is the GNex with it's garbage VIA CDMA chipset. Scanning for LTE isn't going to do that as it is going to find nothing just like it would with an area with no LTE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

according to sprint on the airave when the system polls for 4g the airave can and does often drop the device that did the 4g poll while connected to the airave. it having a via chipset explains quite a bit on my signal issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
according to sprint on the airave when the system polls for 4g the airave can and does often drop the device that did the 4g poll while connected to the airave. it having a via chipset explains quite a bit on my signal issues.

 

I don't believe that at all unless maybe it picks up a fringe LTE signal that is unusable.

 

Just not the way it works. Kinda like saying your phone will drop the 1x connection to scan for EVDO.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's what i been told by more than one level 3 airave technician. My symptoms and further research bear that out. Various sprint forums have multiple threads on multiple Android phones and the 2.5. i even have an offer from Sprint airave tech support that if i can find a 2.0 on ebay up to a certain amount all i have to do is grab it, send them proof of purchase and they'll credit my account for the purchase. i just called back this morning and that offer is legit...so it's a major issue that's just being kept under wraps right now. Here's to hoping sprint gets this fixed right quick. You can't get more definitive than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe that at all unless maybe it picks up a fringe LTE signal that is unusable.

 

Just not the way it works. Kinda like saying your phone will drop the 1x connection to scan for EVDO.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

I will rephrase..when the phone polls for 4g while connected to the airave the airave can and usually does drop the device doing the polling especially if the device is andriod based...it's due to a bug in the firmware of the airave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread explains my signal frustration. Anyone else's Gnex get exceptionally hot on the top half of the phone? Pretty much any activity is causing my phone to get really hot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread explains my signal frustration. Anyone else's Gnex get exceptionally hot on the top half of the phone? Pretty much any activity is causing my phone to get really hot.

 

Yep. All the time. I'm taking mine in tomorrow, and as soon as I get the replacement, I'm selling it on ebay to subsidize the cost of my new iPhone 5. Good thing I kept my EVO Shift around for something, lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By vanko987
      I'm new to this forum, and I've seen people mention cell sites with specific ID's (for example, SF33XC664). Is there any significance to these ID's, and is there a way to decode them? Also, how do I figure out what the cell site ID's are for towers near me?
      Thanks! I'm excited to start talking on this site more 😀
    • By lilotimz
      Samsung Network Vision equipment are highly distinct and fairly easy to spot compared to the equipment that other vendors are deploying. Sprint is Samsung's first extremely massive American contract (baring Clearwire) so there  should be no issues in confusing these equipment for another carrier which happens often with Ericsson NV equipment.

      Below are images of Samsung equipment which includes antennas, remote radio units, base stations, and their mounting configurations. 
       
      Samsung antenna with eSMR 800 RRU & PCS 1900 RRU

      A close look at a Samsung setup





      Next Generation Samsung Configuration
      RRH-P4 4T4R 1.9 GHz  | RRH-C4 4T4R 800 MHz| RRH-V3 2.5 GHz

      Next Generation 8 Port Dual Band Antenna Setup 
      4 port 800 MHz RRH-C4 800

      (source: dkyeager)

      (source: dkyeager)
      Narrow beam setup

      High Capacity Site with 2 Antennas & 3 RRUs (2x PCS & 1x SMR).
      Second antenna is PCS only for now.


      Canadian IBEZ (NO SMR)

      Special Case PCS Only Setup for Canadian IBEZ




      Close up of standard antenna connectors 

      Samsung Cabinets

       
       
      Powerpoint slides from Samsung / Sprint
      *disclaimer - all  powerpoint diagrams and images were found through public municipality online databases and is by no means misappropriated through malicious means*
      *Credit goes to those whom took pictures of these equipment. You know who you are*
    • By kckid
      Sprint announced at MWC trade show in Barcelona that 5G will go live with 4 cities starting in May  (Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas and Kansas City )
      https://phys.org/news/2019-02-sprint-5g-network-chicago-atlanta.html
       
    • By ActionJacksonWX
      Sprint announced the MVNO Google Fi will use its network for 5G in a press release (that is, once there are actually 5G capable phones compatible with Google Fi someday):
      https://newsroom.sprint.com/sprint-to-provide-5g-wireless-services-for-google-fi.htm
       
      This is the first I've heard about Fi and 5G so far. Google has pretty much kept mum on the topic, so I'm somewhat encouraged.
  • Posts

    • Thank you. That’s good to know that it sounds like the modem is better than the XS Max.
    • So after waiting 2 hrs in line at the apple store I finally have a 11 pro. I can tell you the reception is alittle better then last years iPhones. It is a lot better then the unlocked s10 plus I was using which anything above -112 was useless. 
    • Yes we do. 60 MHz NR + 60 MHz LTE out of M-MIMO equipment. DSS will be deployed soon and 40-60 MHz will remain used for LTE on small cells/MBs.  As far as LTE goes, Sprint runs between 60 MHz and 100 MHz on macro sites with 20-60 MHz used for small cells/MBs. The actual numbers vary from market to market. In Seattle, Sprint runs 100 MHz of L2500 on macros, 40 MHz on small cells, and MBs have their own dedicated channel.  Only in areas lacking contiguous spectrum. 60 MHz will be the norm.  Let's not start this discussion again, please. 
    • I'm just saying it will not happen as whomever buys Sprint will want B41. Not every area has 160 mhz. Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
    • We don't know what Sprint is going to do with 5G.  I don't even think for 4G they used all of its 160 GHz of 2.5 GHz spectrum.  Even in early 5G deployments Sprint is only deploying 40 MHz of 2.5 GHz spectrum.  Also we dont know how long Sprint will continue to operate as a company with all of its debt and declining customer base.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...