Jump to content

LTE phones support Clear's LTE?


Recommended Posts

Sprint should add the 2.5 Ghz LTE band in the 2013 LTE phones. There are no excuses especially since Clearwire plans to launch its TD-LTE service in mid 2013.

 

Will be interesting to see the handset the do it in as you can't add unlimited antennaes as there is a limit of space...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will be interesting to see the handset the do it in as you can't add unlimited antennaes as there is a limit of space...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

They should be able to get it done. The iphone 5 can support 4 different bands of lte if am not mistaken, which I could be. I can only imagine having 800, 1900, 2500 lte.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not be surprised if Wi-Fi (2.4 GHz) and LTE 2600 ultimately share an antenna. Since 2x2 MIMO is a given for LTE, that could also enable 2x2 MIMO for 802.11n Wi-Fi.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not be surprised if Wi-Fi (2.4 GHz) and LTE 2600 ultimately share an antenna. Since 2x2 MIMO is a given for LTE, that could also enable 2x2 MIMO for 802.11n Wi-Fi.

 

AJ

 

I've wondered about this possibility myself.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've wondered about this possibility myself.

 

Robert

 

It is just a simple matter of software radio tuning on the antenna. Such as some radio gear with a auto antenna tuner, raising and lowering capacitance on the tuning circuit with variable voltages. We hams do have access and experiment with frequencies of 2.4ghz and higher up to 300ghz.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is just a simple matter of software radio tuning on the antenna. Such as some radio gear with a auto antenna tuner, raising and lowering capacitance on the tuning circuit with variable voltages. We hams do have access and experiment with frequencies of 2.4ghz and higher up to 300ghz.

 

No, probably not. I am guessing that ham radio is not all too concerned about antenna size, varied antenna gain at different frequencies, and power consumption. All of those are major concerns in mobile handsets, which most commonly use microstrip antennas (PIFA) and need to keep consistent antenna gain (within a few dBi) in each operating band.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microstrip_antenna

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No, probably not. I am guessing that ham radio is not all too concerned about antenna size, varied antenna gain at different frequencies, and power consumption. All of those are major concerns in mobile handsets, which most commonly use microstrip antennas (PIFA) and need to keep consistent antenna gain (within a few dBi) in each operating band.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microstrip_antenna

 

AJ

 

Hate to prove you wrong but you can't get a multi band transceiver to operate on 1 antenna size with out a matching antenna network.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to prove you wrong but you can't get a multi band transceiver to operate on 1 antenna size with out a matching antenna network.

 

I am confused. When/where did I say anything contrary to the above?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in this 1 part right here. " No, probably not. I am guessing that ham radio is not all too concerned about antenna size, varied antenna gain at different frequencies, and power consumption" in which we are vary concerned with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in this 1 part right here. " No, probably not. I am guessing that ham radio is not all too concerned about antenna size, varied antenna gain at different frequencies, and power consumption" in which we are vary concerned with that.

 

Okay, sure, I am not very familiar with ham radio equipment. But I doubt that ham concerns about the above properties are as great as they are for handsets. The size of the equipment is just very different.

 

Just curious, do you have any idea what typical ERP/EIRP is for a mobile handset?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

y

Okay, sure, I am not very familiar with ham radio equipment. But I doubt that ham concerns about the above properties are as great as they are for handsets. The size of the equipment is just very different.

 

Just curious, do you have any idea what typical ERP/EIRP is for a mobile handset?

 

AJ

here is something to think about, what is a surefire way of turning your $2,000 and up radio equipment into a paper weight in need of repair? Antenna mismatch. Your typical Cell Phone power range is milliwatts. which hams use in qrp which is low power and radio experiments in the ghz range up to 300ghz.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

here is something to think about, what is a surefire way of turning your $2,000 and up radio equipment into a paper weight in need of repair? Antenna mismatch.

 

Okay, sure, I have no reason to doubt you, as ham radio is your area of expertise, not mine. But now the discussion is really veering off topic to ham radio, which you have not shown to have any particular relevance to mobile handsets.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It is just a simple matter of software radio tuning on the antenna. Such as some radio gear with a auto antenna tuner, raising and lowering capacitance on the tuning circuit with variable voltages. We hams do have access and experiment with frequencies of 2.4ghz and higher up to 300ghz.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Annnnnd another trip through the FCC for testing and approval... Till that happens nothing already released will be allowed to work on said freq...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, are we saying that through a software update some phones could possibly access Clears LTE network?

 

No, definitely not. Software defined radio gives people the idea that anything can be fixed/changed through software, but it is not that simple. So, please, let us not get any members thinking again that RF capabilities can be added via software update. We went through that mess in the spring with some members insisting that WiMAX devices could be updated to LTE.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, definitely not. Software defined radio gives people the idea that anything can be fixed/changed through software, but it is not that simple. So, please, let us not get any members thinking again that RF capabilities can be added via software update. We went through that mess in the spring with some members insisting that WiMAX devices could be updated to LTE.

 

AJ

Lots (and I mean LOTS) of people insisted that the Motorola Photon could be upgraded to LTE with a simple patch, including plenty of Sprint S&R techs. It got bad enough one of the stickies on XDA included a giant, bold, red-font warning saying IT CANT BE UPGRADED TO LTE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It is just a simple matter of software radio tuning on the antenna. Such as some radio gear with a auto antenna tuner' date=' raising and lowering capacitance on the tuning circuit with variable voltages. We hams do have access and experiment with frequencies of 2.4ghz and higher up to 300ghz.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2[/quote']

 

We also have 900 mhz band, but very low power. De n9ovr 73

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure the game plan remains largely the same as Clearwire's standalone plan: use 2600 for offloading traffic in high density areas, and perhaps selling 2600-only LTE as a home broadband solution in those areas. The only main difference under Sprint control is that Sprint can now decide where to deploy 2600 based on its overall needs, rather than Clearwire deploying based on their independent goals.

 

The wildcard is whether NV's design carried through 2600 support as was originally planned. If it did, there will be a lot more 2600 deployed than if it requires new construction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...