Jump to content
kckid

LTE seems to have issues with minor terrain changes

Recommended Posts

It seems that LTE is very susecptible to minor terrain changes. While I was mapping a new LTE area, I noticed that when the road had a minor dip, LTE would drop. Now that I've been using sensorly, I watch the map and see gaps in LTE coverage. Sure enough, when that happens, the road has a dip in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that LTE is very susecptible to minor terrain changes. While I was mapping a new LTE area, I noticed that when the road had a minor dip, LTE would drop. Now that I've been using sensorly, I watch the map and see gaps in LTE coverage. Sure enough, when that happens, the road has a dip in it.

 

In my observations, the EVO LTE was most susceptible to "dips" in the terrain. However, any time you drop into an area, if ever terra firma gets between you and the tower, you will likely lose connection. If you have weaker than a -108dBm signal, any terrain drops will likely result in loss of LTE service, especially with the EVO LTE. Like I mentioned in another forum, the EVO LTE signal bounces around a lot, and when the signal is weak, it will likely bounce right across the LTE connection threshold when driving in lower terrain.

 

I also lose VZW LTE in hollows, especially in weak signal areas. Because 700MHz doesn't penetrate the earth either.

 

Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LTE appears to be very tempermental at 1900. It doesn't take much to obscure it a bit. The propogation should be something in between how 2.5ghz WiMax and 1900 EVDO behave. 800 LTE should behave much better (probably significantly better than 1900 EVDO) usability.

 

My predictions

 

Signal usability from a sprectrum perpective

 

800>>>1900>>>2500

 

Signal usability from a Technology perspective

 

1xAdvanced>EV-DO>>>LTE>WiMax

 

So you get from an overall signal usability of

 

800 1xAdv > 900 EVDO > 800 LTE > 1900 1xAdv > 1900 EVDO >> 1900 LTE >>> 2500 WiMax

 

This is one of the reasons I think (although no one else agrees) that Sprint should deploy EVDO on their 900mhz band for more high speed coverage.

 

Edit: The 900 mhz band has been completely convoluted in a way that prevents its use from anything other than iden.

 

To bring some greater clarity to the SMR 900 MHz discussion, I have cooked up another of my famous graphs.

 

smr900mhz.png

 

Note the interleaved nature of the SMR blocks; B/ILT blocks occupy the channels in between. At the very least, this is why Sprint cannot currently utilize its SMR 900 MHz holdings for CDMA1X or LTE.

 

AJ

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think LTE 1900 signal is tempermental at all, except when you have a weak signal. I was getting 30Mbps+ indoors at my hotel in Wichita Falls. Never felt tempermental except at the edge of service, and some devices were worse than others.

 

LTE signal dropped the same number of dBm going indoors and around obstacles as 1x and EVDO did in all my observations. The difference is that LTE maxes out at -95 RSSI. But so does VZW LTE. The difference is that VZW's -95 will be farther from the site. But it needs to because their site spacing is not as dense as Sprint LTE at 1900.

 

In all my tests, Sprint LTE outperformed VZW LTE and Tmo HSPA+ in Wichita Falls, except around the few sites where Sprint has not deployed yet on the south side of the city around the mall. And that includes in buildings and at the bottom of hills.

 

The big difference though was the EVO. If you were in an area consistently worse than -108 RSRP, you were not going to be able to keep a connection for long. The other LTE devices could tolerate a bad signal at the edge of service for a few moments. Like driving at a low spot in the road at driving speeds, or driving behind a big building that blocks a distant LTE signal. The other devices would cling to a weak LTE signal for a few seconds and then recover without loss of connection. But the EVO would almost always drop in these momentary points.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another point I want to make is I lose Verizon LTE signals all the time at the edge of service exactly the same way, around large obstacles that block the signal and in dips in the road. And I lose Tmo HSPA+ even worse in same said spots than even Sprint LTE. VZW LTE requires a cycle to reconnect often, and requires a reboot on my hotspot. Now that's a pain.

 

I lose HSPA and HSPA+ so readily on Tmo. But at least it comes back very quickly and easily on its own after the momentary signal loss. Sprint LTE devices would feel much better in those momentary signal losses if they rebounded back to LTE on their own quickly. This really is the problem.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By vanko987
      I'm new to this forum, and I've seen people mention cell sites with specific ID's (for example, SF33XC664). Is there any significance to these ID's, and is there a way to decode them? Also, how do I figure out what the cell site ID's are for towers near me?
      Thanks! I'm excited to start talking on this site more 😀
    • By Paynefanbro
      I figured since Verizon's 5G-NR network officially launched it would make sense for there to be a thread for it.
    • By lilotimz
      Samsung Network Vision equipment are highly distinct and fairly easy to spot compared to the equipment that other vendors are deploying. Sprint is Samsung's first extremely massive American contract (baring Clearwire) so there  should be no issues in confusing these equipment for another carrier which happens often with Ericsson NV equipment.

      Below are images of Samsung equipment which includes antennas, remote radio units, base stations, and their mounting configurations. 
       
      Samsung antenna with eSMR 800 RRU & PCS 1900 RRU

      A close look at a Samsung setup





      Next Generation Samsung Configuration
      RRH-P4 4T4R 1.9 GHz  | RRH-C4 4T4R 800 MHz| RRH-V3 2.5 GHz

      Next Generation 8 Port Dual Band Antenna Setup 
      4 port 800 MHz RRH-C4 800

      (source: dkyeager)

      (source: dkyeager)
      Narrow beam setup

      High Capacity Site with 2 Antennas & 3 RRUs (2x PCS & 1x SMR).
      Second antenna is PCS only for now.


      Canadian IBEZ (NO SMR)

      Special Case PCS Only Setup for Canadian IBEZ




      Close up of standard antenna connectors 

      Samsung Cabinets

       
       
      Powerpoint slides from Samsung / Sprint
      *disclaimer - all  powerpoint diagrams and images were found through public municipality online databases and is by no means misappropriated through malicious means*
      *Credit goes to those whom took pictures of these equipment. You know who you are*
    • By kckid
      Sprint announced at MWC trade show in Barcelona that 5G will go live with 4 cities starting in May  (Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas and Kansas City )
      https://phys.org/news/2019-02-sprint-5g-network-chicago-atlanta.html
       
  • Posts

    • It seems really big to me, but I have to admit I'm considering it.  The dual screen thing seems moderately interesting.  I'd be interested in trying it out.  EDIT:  But Best Buy has the G8X on sale right now at a very sensible price.  It's comparable in size to my G6, versus the V60 which, having looked at the dimensions, seems enormous by comparison.  My G6 is already at the very top end of what would fit in my hand.  If I got the V60, it'd be solely for the ability to use 5G, which I don't really need other than for tracking purposes--and right now, I think it's pretty safe to assume that a site with 600 MHz LTE on T-Mobile or a Massive MIMO antenna on Sprint is running 5G without having to prove it that way. - Trip
    • Official LG intro video:  
    • Any thoughts on the included dual-screen? Doesn't seem like something I'd use, would be nice to have an option where it's not included, maybe for a slightly lower price.  Battery size is nice! LG lagged a little behind on the battery for the G series for a while. https://www.cnet.com/news/hands-on-lg-v60-thinq-5g-with-8k-video-and-dual-screen/
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...