Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm trying my best to find out what tower I'm connected to, but while I was on the ##DEBUG# menu, I noticed my 1x protocol has a 1x 2nd RSSI at -63. Is this always -63 and does this mean there's another tower that's got a -63 dBm signal? Also - does the Latitude/Longitude combo on this screen tell me which site I'm connected to?

 

Thanks

 

I'm on GS3 if it matters.

Posted

I just got back from dropping off the wife at work, and from what I saw, using the CDMA tool, 1xRTT doesn't report BSLON and BSLAT like the eHRPD towers I'm seeing ...

 

Not sure why, but the tool let me map the towers that were reporting eHRPD (more than 1 tower in my area has changed over)...

 

A month ago I did speedtests in this area and never got nothing but 1xRTT and never got speeds over .30mbps down or up...

 

but just now, I did a few speedtests and got speeds of 1.20mbps down, .73mbps up....

Posted
I'm trying my best to find out what tower I'm connected to, but while I was on the ##DEBUG# menu, I noticed my 1x protocol has a 1x 2nd RSSI at -63. Is this always -63 and does this mean there's another tower that's got a -63 dBm signal? Also - does the Latitude/Longitude combo on this screen tell me which site I'm connected to?

 

Thanks

 

I'm on GS3 if it matters.

 

It may be possible to be connected to a different 1x site with your second 1x antenna, however, the difference in signal is more likely the antenna location. The weaker one is more likely underneath your hand. On my Note 2, one is usually stronger than the other in my hand until I set my phone down. Then they get much closer in strength.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

It may be possible to be connected to a different 1x site with your second 1x antenna, however, the difference in signal is more likely the antenna location. The weaker one is more likely underneath your hand. On my Note 2, one is usually stronger than the other in my hand until I set my phone down. Then they get much closer in strength.

 

I am fairly certain that with CDMA1X receive diversity, both Rx antennas are always tracking the same PN offset. I do not believe that they can track different sectors/sites. So, the latter -- antenna location -- is the more likely explanation. One Rx antenna has a stronger path to the serving sector. Furthermore, the primary and secondary Rx antennas often have different gain structures. So, one may naturally acquire a stronger signal than the other even if field strength is identical at both antennas.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Posted

I am fairly certain that with CDMA1X receive diversity, both Rx antennas are always tracking the same PN offset. I do not believe that they can track different sectors/sites. So, the latter -- antenna location -- is the more likely explanation. One Rx antenna has a stronger path to the serving sector. Furthermore, the primary and secondary Rx antennas often have different gain structures. So, one may naturally acquire a stronger signal than the other even if field strength is identical at both antennas.

 

AJ

 

I thought you may say something like this. That's why I used weak language like "may." I always appreciate your feedback on these subjects. :tu:

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Posted

I thought you may say something like this. That's why I used weak language like "may." I always appreciate your feedback on these subjects. :tu:

 

To be clear, CDMA1X most certainly does allow simultaneous connection to multiple PN offsets (i.e. soft/softer handoff), but that is through the use of a RAKE receiver, which requires only a single antenna and was part of cdmaOne from the beginning.

 

My understanding of CDMA1X receive diversity is that it can be used to extend coverage and/or improve capacity. In CDMA1X, both coverage and capacity are limited by power. By using two Rx diversity antennas in the handset, a base station may be able to cover a greater distance at the same power level because when the handset's primary Rx antenna is in a fade, the secondary Rx antenna probably has a stronger signal path. Similarly, a base station may able to provide greater capacity by lowering its power level because, again, the two Rx diversity antennas help the handset cope with weaker signal strength.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Posted

So, then where is the lte antenna because I'd rather have it closer to the 2nd 1x antenna rather than the primary one Lol!

 

Primary is in the -80s, 2ndary is high -60s.

 

Also thanks all for the wonderful explanations.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Posted

Ascertion, can you post some CDMA1X engineering screen caps? I am not certain that Rx diversity is active in idle state, only in traffic state. Thus, the secondary antenna stats might not be valid. I would like to see one screen cap with the handset idle, another screen cap with the handset on a traffic channel in the same location.

 

Now, speaking of Rx diversity, here are a couple of Galaxy Note 2 jokes...

 

That phone's so big, one Rx antenna is in New Jersey, the other is in Ohio.

That phone's so big, one Rx antenna gets free night & weekend calling an hour before the other does.

That phone's so big, when it switches from the primary to the secondary antenna, you get charged long distance.

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Posted

Strange. Last night it said second 1x was -67dBm, but now my primary is better.

 

yjuge3a6.jpg

If I see it at -67 again, I'll screenie it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Spent a lot of time in Westchester this weekend, specifically Yonkers and White Plains. I mapped three AT&T Nokia -> Ericsson conversions. I was super impressed with T-Mobile's macro density and not so much with AT&T's. In Yonkers it seems like T-Mobile macros outnumber AT&T macros 3 to 1 and in White Plains, 2 to 1. Another surprise was the lack of small cells on AT&T in both cities. While Cellmapper shows White Plains having no small cells, I did manage to find one in the Church Street neighborhood. While it's only one, it's an indication to me that T-Mobile intends on expanding n41 density with small cells in the city. On the other hand, in Yonkers T-Mobile has a ton of LTE small cells but none of them have been upgraded to 5G yet as far as I can tell. Crown Castle has been moving super fast in NYC and Long Island to upgrade and install new 5G small cells so I can only assume it's either a permitting or backhaul issue that's stopping them from moving full steam ahead there. — — — — — Came across this cool site in Yonkers with Verizon, T-Mobile, and Dish present.
    • Other two sectors finally installed. Hopefully it goes live soon though I know from past experience that these new builds can take weeks and in some cases months to go live.
    • Which is not surprising given that Verizon’s entire 5G network consists of only C-band and mmWave in most of their coverage area. I’m more surprised that despite having a 5G network that’s almost entirely made up of only two super fast and super high capacity bands, both T-Mobile and AT&T showed higher average speeds on 5G according to OpenSignal. I would’ve expected Verizon to be a close second to T-Mobile but it was a blowout. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...