Jump to content

PRL 24009/25009 Changes


Recommended Posts

I'm in Chicago and on PRL 55009 on my GN2. Is there any way that I could get to 25009? It sounds like I might be able to utilize the benefit of 800SMR around here but my PRL doesn't support it.

 

Thanks.

 

I would venture to say that 25xxx series was not made to work uniquely for your device (i.e. the radios will not support all that is in another PRL just as those using the 25xxx series would not benefit from a 55xxx series PRL) so it will not make a difference anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would venture to say that 25xxx series was not made to work uniquely for your device (i.e. the radios will not support all that is in another PRL just as those using the 25xxx series would not benefit from a 55xxx series PRL) so it will not make a difference anyway

 

I thought I read somewhere around here though (and I can't find it now) of somebody using the Galaxy Note 2 and getting 800SMR so based on digiblur's comment that only 25xxx support 800SMR it would mean that those PRLs would work on the GN2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I read somewhere around here though (and I can't find it now) of somebody using the Galaxy Note 2 and getting 800SMR so based on digiblur's comment that only 25xxx support 800SMR it would mean that those PRLs would work on the GN2.

 

The Note 2 supports bandclass 10 according to AJ so I don't see any issues.

 

Dig around...I remember something about you put the PRL in a folder renamed to test or then use the ##data# option to write it. Google around, it was the same on the S3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't the 56XXX series support EvDo roam and LTE?

 

(That's what I thought I saw when I looked at the content of 56006 compared to the content of 55006.)

 

Sent from Photon Q LTE - Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't the 56XXX series support EvDo roam and LTE?

 

(That's what I thought I saw when I looked at the content of 56006 compared to the content of 55006.)

 

Sent from Photon Q LTE - Tapatalk

 

That's what I thought, but I read somewhere that it didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I thought, but I read somewhere that it didn't.

 

Perhaps it doesn't in all areas. I did not, of course, do a 100% check of the two PRLs, only those areas where I might most need something better than what I have now when I travel in Montana.

 

For the "Billings, MT" area (in Region 3) 56XXX showed to scan for 3G while the stock 55XXX showed 1X only, and my understanding was that both 55XXX and 56XXX were LTE PRLs.

 

Then again, I could be totally wrong as I do not have a rooted device, and apparently that is needed to move to a non-standard PRL.

 

Sent from Photon Q LTE - Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are all LTE enabled PRLs. Root and writing a prl have nothing to do with each other.

 

I am about to update the site with the new changes on PRLs. I will let you guys know when it is done.

 

Thanks buddy, hopefully SID 22 is on there (Verizon 3G roaming!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 56XXX series PRL on my iPhone. How would I go about providing that for you to analyze?

 

I already have it. And are you sure it is 56xxx? Are you on a corporate account?

 

Sent from my EVO sometimes-LTE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the same one on my 5. I had 33XXX something before.

 

I have seen that one before or one like it from someone that pulled it from a non-activated iPhone. Its PRL for provisioning/activating only apparently as it was a very very simple PRL only Sprint SIDs in it and I don't think it had EVDO either. It wasn't designed to be used except for a the first few seconds of activation anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I have seen that one before or one like it from someone that pulled it from a non-activated iPhone. Its PRL for provisioning/activating only apparently as it was a very very simple PRL only Sprint SIDs in it and I don't think it had EVDO either. It wasn't designed to be used except for a the first few seconds of activation anyways.

 

Oh I see. Mine actually seemed to work better on that PRL than the one after. But this one is working great. I mean, as great as it probably can until Network Vision hits here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I see. Mine actually seemed to work better on that PRL than the one after. But this one is working great. I mean, as great as it probably can until Network Vision hits here.

 

Working "better" is one of the simple placebo's of PRLs. You will really find just about zero real differences of Sprint native PCS CDMA/EVDO service in a PRL of today compared to one 2-3 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears that in the San Diego region as of late sites are going down for hours or days on end. I'm on the 25009 PRL and one major inconvenience I have noticed when these sites do go down (in places I generally had good to excellent coverage) and I am forced to roam, I cannot make or receive calls. Data oddly works good when roaming via Verizon but I cannot make a call to save my life /S with the new PRL when roaming.

 

Did Sprint take out voice roaming in this latest PRL @digiblur?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, no San Diego changes. The analysis is here: http://www.batonrougebroadband.info/Sprint_25009.txt Find your Sprint SID. Then start scrolling down, that's what your phone looks for when it can't find your regular SID. Once it gets to the end of the geo in the PRL it jumps to the very top and starts working its way down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I certainly would like to get to the bottom of what is going on in the market down here. it's not isolated to my lines or account as several friends who have sprint in the area have been reporting the same issues. So I guess your guess is as good as mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure you are set to automatic roaming?

 

Sent from my EVO sometimes-LTE

 

I am. And I did try to manually force options.

 

A strange thing did happen yesterday though. I don't know how to even explain how or why it was working. I had absolutely no service at a Verizon store when I went to purchase a mobile hotspot for my RV'ing mother, but was still receiving good data speeds.

 

Either my phone has a serious software bug or Sprint has a sick sense of humor. I was streaming Nikita on Hulu while waiting for the VZ guy to go check to see if the item was in fact in stock. WiFi was completely off, G+ was uploading some videos I took of my nephew at lunch in the background, and email/game notifications still continued to show up despite my phone reporting : Mobile Network state disconnected, mobile network type unknown, service state not in service, network unknown with a no service indicator icon in my notification tray as well. things that make me go hmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am. And I did try to manually force options. A strange thing did happen yesterday though. I don't know how to even explain how or why it was working. I had absolutely no service at a Verizon store when I went to purchase a mobile hotspot for my RV'ing mother, but was still receiving good data speeds. Either my phone has a serious software bug or Sprint has a sick sense of humor. I was streaming Nikita on Hulu while waiting for the VZ guy to go check to see if the item was in fact in stock. WiFi was completely off, G+ was uploading some videos I took of my nephew at lunch in the background, and email/game notifications still continued to show up despite my phone reporting : Mobile Network state disconnected, mobile network type unknown, service state not in service, network unknown with a no service indicator icon in my notification tray as well. things that make me go hmmmm

 

What phone type and how were you forcing the roaming? The reason I was asking was on the S3, roam control has to do a little hackery to get it to roam. It's not really forcing it to roam, it just tells the phone to only use the 850 band, so of course it has nothing else to do but pull roaming signals. The only problem is, there are several areas with no CDMA 850 carrier.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

What phone type and how were you forcing the roaming? The reason I was asking was on the S3, roam control has to do a little hackery to get it to roam. It's not really forcing it to roam, it just tells the phone to only use the 850 band, so of course it has nothing else to do but pull roaming signals. The only problem is, there are several areas with no CDMA 850 carrier.

 

Is LA an area with no cdma 850? Cause this would finally explains why I can't get anything when force roaming on roam control.

 

Sent from my SGS3.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...