Jump to content
jasper7821

Network Vision/LTE - Tucson/Yuma Market

Recommended Posts

Will it get better or is this just how it is?

If your surrounded by accepted sites, that is the way it's going to be. I'm having the same issue here in Yuma, LTE is very weak and spotty; very rare I get a connection indoors.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

#IBEZproblems

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your surrounded by accepted sites, that is the way it's going to be. I'm having the same issue here in Yuma, LTE is very weak and spotty; very rare I get a connection indoors.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

You mean we won't be having "Spark" (or what ever it will be) anytime soon? :-P

 

Lateck,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean we won't be having "Spark" (or what ever it will be) anytime soon? :-P

 

Lateck,

 

Spark is the 2.5GHz spectrum from Clearwire.

 

800MHz SMR spectrum taken from Nextel is the issue in IBEZ areas like ours. The internationa boundary with Canada and Mexico means that there are numerous other regulatory difficulties that need to be overcome before the spectrum can be used for CDMA/LTE. Stray signals travelling over the border can wreak havok so it must be planned out exactly for guard bands, etc. to mitigate issues. Anyplace within approximately 100 miles of the Canadian and Mexican borders aren't going to see 800MHz for a while, thus we will have worse indoor coverage and some gaps between towers still that anywhere else would be covered.

 

I'm hoping we get to see Spark coverage faster due to this however. Part of the other reason for 800MHz is to offload some customers from the 1900MHz LTE if possible to ballance the load, without the ability to do that in IBEZ areas, the LTE carriers here will get overloaded faster, which Spark could help take care of by generating those higher-speed LTE hotspots around the towers for those within range. This may just be wishful thinking on my part though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll get SMR, I know I will, I'll pretend our data rates aren't sinking. And I'll tell myself I've got signal 'cause I'm the king of wishful thinking...

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spark is the 2.5GHz spectrum from Clearwire.

 

800MHz SMR spectrum taken from Nextel is the issue in IBEZ areas like ours. The internationa boundary with Canada and Mexico means that there are numerous other regulatory difficulties that need to be overcome before the spectrum can be used for CDMA/LTE. Stray signals travelling over the border can wreak havok so it must be planned out exactly for guard bands, etc. to mitigate issues. Anyplace within approximately 100 miles of the Canadian and Mexican borders aren't going to see 800MHz for a while, thus we will have worse indoor coverage and some gaps between towers still that anywhere else would be covered.

 

I'm hoping we get to see Spark coverage faster due to this however. Part of the other reason for 800MHz is to offload some customers from the 1900MHz LTE if possible to ballance the load, without the ability to do that in IBEZ areas, the LTE carriers here will get overloaded faster, which Spark could help take care of by generating those higher-speed LTE hotspots around the towers for those within range. This may just be wishful thinking on my part though.

 

If it was already established with Nextel then why cant they just use that? Its not like its a different company anymore, they own it! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was already established with Nextel then why cant they just use that? Its not like its a different company anymore, they own it! 

 

The spectrum is only authorized for interleaved narrowband transmissions on specific channels, coordinated with Mexican and Canadian companies within the International Boundary Exclusion Zone.  Sprint can continue to use narrowband technologies like iDEN in the IBEZ.  But that is not useful.

 

Both CDMA and LTE are wideband operations.  Coordination with International Wireless providers has not been completed between the two countries for the 800MHz SMR band.  That is the problem.

 

Robert

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FINALLY!!!!! 4G at Wilmot/Nicaragua, Tucson (DMAFB Wilmot gate).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FINALLY!!!!! 4G at Wilmot/Nicaragua, Tucson (DMAFB Wilmot gate).

 

That site has been giving horrible service for weeks now. We knew it was being upgraded despite no official ticket in the system. Must have gotten at least 5 people a day into our store for just that tower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That site has been giving horrible service for weeks now. We knew it was being upgraded despite no official ticket in the system. Must have gotten at least 5 people a day into our store for just that tower.

4G speed download 8.8 Mps but now signal strength has been reduced to 3-4 bars. It used to be 6 solid bars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I woke up to this morning (near DMAFB Wilmot Gate, Tucson, Az)!

post-24886-0-75333600-1395491673_thumb.png

Edited by spanky
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The good thing is that tucson proper is above 50% completion, so now it's a matter of filling in gaps

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the past week, I've been seeing crews working on the already accepted sites here in Yuma. I haven't noticed anything new on the towers and I haven't seen anything different with the signals. Anyone have an idea of what they might be doing?

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the past week, I've been seeing crews working on the already accepted sites here in Yuma. I haven't noticed anything new on the towers and I haven't seen anything different with the signals. Anyone have an idea of what they might be doing?

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

Possibilities include adjusting/tuning the sites, adding cards for 1x 800, adding cards for LTE 800, avoiding other work, forgot their favorite coffee thermos, etc....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So in Yuma the Foothills Blvd tower still is not broadcasting lte. My Airave crashed at home and had to call sprint for a replacement, the tech said the system showed that tower is scheduled to be lte live in the next 3 months. I still have no idea why that one tower was left out of the mix when all the other towers in Yuma went lte live

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibilities include adjusting/tuning the sites, adding cards for 1x 800, adding cards for LTE 800, avoiding other work, forgot their favorite coffee thermos, etc....

Well they do have a boom working on the antennas and it looked like they were plugging more stuff up there but it was very hard to see.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody else having horrible indoor coverage?  I work at the Quik Trip on 1st and Glenn, I can see an LTE tower about 100 yards away.  When I go indoors, my coverage significantly drops from full to 2-3 bars.  At other places I've noticed having 2-3 bars outside, then going inside and being at 3g half the time and a bar of LTE the other half.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody else having horrible indoor coverage?  I work at the Quik Trip on 1st and Glenn, I can see an LTE tower about 100 yards away.  When I go indoors, my coverage significantly drops from full to 2-3 bars.  At other places I've noticed having 2-3 bars outside, then going inside and being at 3g half the time and a bar of LTE the other half.

 

Buildings significantly disrupt cell signals. This is not an unknown phenomenon. Some buildings more than others, it just depends on the construction. If you're walking into a metal box, good luck getting signal. 

 

It doesn't help either that all sites aren't broadcasting yet. Though you are close to the halfway mark.

 

Is that a fairly new Quick Trip? Doesn't show up on Google Maps satellite or street view haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But why does the 3g work in the same place? This is what I don't get. My gf is always completing that she never gets 4g at her work. She has to turn lte mode off because when it does connect nothing on her phone will work. The tower by her work and in back both have lte.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But why does the 3g work in the same place? This is what I don't get. My gf is always completing that she never gets 4g at her work. She has to turn lte mode off because when it does connect nothing on her phone will work. The tower by her work and in back both have lte.

Because you need a stronger signal for LTE to work? Thought that had been discussed before.

 

LTE propagates at the same rate as EVDO, but is a more fragile air link. LTE works down to about -95dBm RSSI whereas EVDO works down to about -115dBm RSSI.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I am really confused! We were all lead to believe that 4G would provide better penetration. Does that mean I need to place my phone back to 3G before having sex? LOL! Actually, it's not that big of a deal to switch back and forth - I get full bars for phone calls in CDMA and 3-4 bars when using data in 4G (usually 7.5-15 Mbps). Bottom line is service has improved significantly.

 

P.S. Sensorly reflects a 4 bar signal is tops for 4G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because you need a stronger signal for LTE to work? Thought that had been discussed before.

 

LTE propagates at the same rate as EVDO, but is a more fragile air link. LTE works down to about -95dBm RSSI whereas EVDO works down to about -115dBm RSSI.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

-_- Its just extremely frustrating.. No LTE at home or work and when i do run into it it doesn't  function half the time anyway. The whole process feels pointless. 

 

What is an air link? I thought they were both 1900? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

eHRPD:11 is the equivalent of an Error 67 on EVDO. Most new phones now show both eHRPD:11 MIP:67 on the error screen that comes up now.

 

It is a data authentication failure. There are numerous reasons for this to occur, most having to do with your phone's data provisioning being out of sync with the network values. It will also occur when your phone is hotlined, suspended or disconnected; since your NAI is then suspended as well in those instances.

 

It gives no information to actually  determine what the cause is, it's the runny nose of the mobile world, a symptom with no real evidence of the cause but a huge number of potential causes.

Question, if an account is suspended, hotlined etc, would this message occur on all the phones in ones account or only on the main line?  

 

Edit: never mind, found the problem. and to answer my own question, yes, the other three lines were not suspended, only the main line on the account. Seems that I failed to correct my Banks' BillPay which had the previous credit card (that was hacked) number and didn't update with the new card. So my payment never went through lol opps.

Sprint ain't no joke, You have 10 days left to pay, but we want our money now. It isn't called the Now network for no reason. lol

 

TS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • LTE or LTE B? would be good.  I personally prefer to know that it is unknown.  Thanks!
    • Shoot me a diagnostic if you can catch this again! Invalid signal levels should automatically be filtered out.   Yeah, B66 and B71 are natively reported wrong on many devices due to an Android bug. SignalCheck tries to catch these and report them as B66/B71, but it's tricky because in some instances the incorrect band is actually a possible valid result. I'm not aware of B7 showing up, if someone catches that please send a diagnostic.. it is likely B66/B71 being reported incorrectly but not getting caught.
    • The report you sent showed the app was displaying B2 and the icon at the time was also B2--I checked the graphics to make sure the B2 icon didn't actually say B71, LOL.. if it happens again send another report! I don't recall any recent reports of the notification icon falling out of sync with the app itself.
    • Your G4 is running Android 6.0, which does not report EARFCN info. SignalCheck is displaying it as band 41 because PLMN ID 311490 is leading it to believe that it is a former Clear site, so it defaults to B41 unless another band is identified another way. With 311490 now being used during the merger transition, it's throwing things off. Unfortunately the app isn't going to be able to know if it's a Clear site or a merger-related thing.. perhaps I'll just remove the default band for now, since newer devices will be able to figure it out anyway. These multiple PLMNs are going to be even more problematic than they were before, because they aren't being used the same way in every market.
    • Because just like any other network, they can't guarantee coverage everywhere.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...