Jump to content

Sprint LTE Device Release Dates


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

Don't forget about the Motorola XT1056.

 

Wait! What? Did I miss something later in the day?

 

Oh, that was today! I can't maintain a stable connection long enough to browse the FCC database tonight. I'll try when I get back to California.

 

Thanks for posting!

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the Kyocera Hydro on this list?

As far as I can tell, it's not an LTE phone. When the FCC docs come up and show LTE, I will add it to the list. But I do like the fact that Sprint is getting more rugged devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh, it would be nice if the hotspots (and even tablets) were in the table that you have just to have an easy view of which devices  support which LTE bands.  You could just put N/A (or -- or whatever) in the SVDO and SVLTE columns.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh, it would be nice if the hotspots (and even tablets) were in the table that you have just to have an easy view of which devices  support which LTE bands.  You could just put N/A (or -- or whatever) in the SVDO and SVLTE columns.

I haven't had time to update the table, or the internet connection to do so until today, so later tonight I will add it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the Kyocera Hydro on this list?

 

It's official. The Kyocera Hydro doesn't have LTE support, as the FCC docs posted yesterday. I should start a 3G based list, but I've been more interested in Sprint's LTE line of phones.

 

If anyone wants me to start a 3G smartphone based list for the smartphones that don't have LTE, please like this post. Thanks!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wants me to start a 3G smartphone based list for the smartphones that don't have LTE, please like this post. Thanks!

 

¬Like.  Now, look up what that means in symbolic logic.

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm shocked that Sprint would but out a smart phone that is not LTE capable, I figured they would still have feature phones that were 3G or the psuedo smartphones that were 3G...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh, it would be nice if the hotspots (and even tablets) were in the table that you have just to have an easy view of which devices  support which LTE bands.  You could just put N/A (or -- or whatever) in the SVDO and SVLTE columns.

 

I added the Broadband LTE devices in their own table under the first. I will try to clean up the OP when I have time and figure out how to build a table on this forum that will stick.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I added the Broadband LTE devices in their own table under the first. I will try to clean up the OP when I have time and figure out how to build a table on this forum that will stick.

 

 

Thanks Josh.  Looks good and very handy!   :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I added the Broadband LTE devices in their own table under the first. I will try to clean up the OP when I have time and figure out how to build a table on this forum that will stick.

 

Does having a tri-band LTE phone really matter? I'm in silicon valley and was about to get an S4 (since it doesn't look like Sprint is getting a Lumia anytime soon). I don't want to pay (an estimated) $299 for a Note 3 (although I do like the bigger screen) and $199 after rebates seems "reasonable" for the S4. Do I need to worry that my current S4 won't have the updated LTE chip? According to your chart, I can still talk on the phone and use LTE data, correct? 

 

I don't plan on using the phone for international travel, perhaps VERY minor (ie. maybe a couple times in the next two years) use out of CA. Will my overall speeds improve with the updated LTE chip? Should I wait for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I added the Broadband LTE devices in their own table under the first. I will try to clean up the OP when I have time and figure out how to build a table on this forum that will stick.

 

 

Does having a tri-band LTE phone really matter? I'm in silicon valley and was about to get an S4 (since it doesn't look like Sprint is getting a Lumia anytime soon). I don't want to pay (an estimated) $299 for a Note 3 (although I do like the bigger screen) and $199 after rebates seems "reasonable" for the S4. Do I need to worry that my current S4 won't have the updated LTE chip? According to your chart, I can still talk on the phone and use LTE data, correct?

 

I don't plan on using the phone for international travel, perhaps VERY minor (ie. maybe a couple times in the next two years) use out of CA. Will my overall speeds improve with the updated LTE chip? Should I wait for it?

I'm not the expert on chipsets and cell spectrum, but if you need a new phone now, then get the S4, but if you can wait until fall to get the S4 tri-band, then wait for it. SMR800 LTE has the advantage of greater in-building penetration for signal vs 1900 PCS G that Sprint is using for the current LTE network. And yes, the S4 does have SVLTE. All LTE phones except the iPhone 5 have SVLTE.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not the expert on chipsets and cell spectrum, but if you need a new phone now, then get the S4, but if you can wait until fall to get the S4 tri-band, then wait for it. SMR800 LTE has the advantage of greater in-building penetration for signal vs 1900 PCS G that Sprint is using for the current LTE network. And yes, the S4 does have SVLTE. All LTE phones except the iPhone 5 have SVLTE.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

Thank you. 

 

So far, my 4s often has issues getting a decent data signal indoors or in the train tunnels. You're saying the new s4 variant will not have these issues or will have mitigated it significantly?

 

If that is the case, I don't mind waiting for the new version to come out if it's within 90 days.

Edited by rebelx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I'm not the expert on chipsets and cell spectrum, but if you need a new phone now, then get the S4, but if you can wait until fall to get the S4 tri-band, then wait for it. SMR800 LTE has the advantage of greater in-building penetration for signal vs 1900 PCS G that Sprint is using for the current LTE network. And yes, the S4 does have SVLTE. All LTE phones except the iPhone 5 have SVLTE.

 

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Thank you.

 

So far, my 4s often has issues getting a decent data signal indoors or in the train tunnels. You're saying the new s4 variant will not have these issues or will have mitigated it significantly?

 

If that is the case, I don't mind waiting for the new version to come out if it's within 90 days.

 

I'm going to guess something like mid-October for Tri-Band LTE phones. The data cards are slated for a summer release, and summer lasts until September.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Argh, mid-October is not good. That's almost mid-cycle for the s4, and then I'll be wanting the s5 or equivalent. It ostensibly should be cheaper, however. Maybe the Note 3 will be out by then?
 

I'm going to guess something like mid-October for Tri-Band LTE phones. The data cards are slated for a summer release, and summer lasts until September.


Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Argh, mid-October is not good. That's almost mid-cycle for the s4, and then I'll be wanting the s5 or equivalent. It ostensibly should be cheaper, however. Maybe the Note 3 will be out by then?

 

 

 

 

I'm going to guess something like mid-October for Tri-Band LTE phones. The data cards are slated for a summer release, and summer lasts until September.

 

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Not sure. I'm thinking possibly if they stick to the Galaxy Note 2 release schedule, then it'll be late October.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint Vital made by ZTE (meh) being reported on Engadget.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

I added that the other day. Glad to see more sites are reporting it. Hopefully it'll get a release soon.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today Sprint announced June 14 availability of the LG Optimus F3. Phone is model LS720. Specifics include 'Advanced Accessibility options for the visually impaired.

 

Glad to see Sprint reaching out to help those who can't see very well, or at all.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Added the HTC Windows Phone and the Sprint Vital by ZTE passed thru the FCC today. I'm thinking an official announcement will be in the coming weeks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Added the HTC Windows Phone and the Sprint Vital by HTC passed thru the FCC today. I'm thinking an official announcement will be in the coming weeks.

You mean Vital by ZTE. And, Josh, do you have any info on the Sprint variant Motorola handset that hit the FCC OET about two weeks ago? I encountered it earlier tonight.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Added the HTC Windows Phone and the Sprint Vital by HTC passed thru the FCC today. I'm thinking an official announcement will be in the coming weeks.

 

You mean Vital by ZTE. And, Josh, do you have any info on the Sprint variant Motorola handset that hit the FCC OET about two weeks ago? I encountered it earlier tonight.

 

 

AJ

Thanks for catching that AJ. And no, I don't have details for the Motorola. I think it only has SVLTE, if I remember. I'll try to remember to sit down and look at it again.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, both the HTC and Motorola handsets support SVLTE but not SVDO -- as expected by this point.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...