Jump to content
prophead

Everything 800mhz (1xA, LTE, coverage, timeline, etc)

Recommended Posts

Yep, Ericsson is troublesome .. My opinion and from what I have seen is they sign off on their own work when they are not supposed to. I don't understand how some of them passed. Horrible job that can be seen from the road on some sites.

I think ALU takes the cake of worse vendor performance over ericsson and samsung

 

Sent from my Motorola Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think ALU takes the cake of worse vendor performance over ericsson and samsung

 

Wait, there is going to be cake?  No one told me there was going to be cake.  Is it going to be in The Lounge?

 

no-cake-for-milton.jpeg

 

AJ

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, there is going to be cake?  No one told me there was going to be cake.  Is it going to be in The Lounge?

 

no-cake-for-milton.jpeg

 

AJ

 

Oh Milton.  I bet this scene was why he took revenge on IniTech.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think ALU takes the cake of worse vendor performance over ericsson and samsung

 

Sent from my Motorola Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

With these issues that I keep reading about in Ericsson markets I'll have to respectfully disagree.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But mobile devices have omnidirectional antennas.  And the Netgear tri band hotspot, for example, can pump out 32.3 dBm (1.7 W) in band 26 LTE 800.  That is plenty of power to raise the noise floor across the border.  So, there is your counterpoint.

 

AJ

 

Wow. That amount of power is downright impressive for a pocket-sized device. Where does the MiFi fall on that scale?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think ALU takes the cake of worse vendor performance over ericsson and samsung

Really? I've been pretty impressed with the speed and quality of the ALU rollout around Boston.. I take it you're less-than-satisfied with their work in the Southwest?

 

-Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? I've been pretty impressed with the speed and quality of the ALU rollout around Boston.. I take it you're less-than-satisfied with their work in the Southwest?

 

-Mike

 

Ok I guess I was more inferring more to the performance of how slow things are going in ALU markets for launching LTE vs. performance of NV sites after launch.

 

I haven't tested LTE myself so I can't vouch if ALU LTE is overall better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I guess I was more inferring more to the performance of how slow things are going in ALU markets for launching LTE vs. performance of NV sites after launch.

 

I haven't tested LTE myself so I can't vouch if ALU LTE is overall better.

 

I was referring to the same thing.. granted, my area was a First Round market, but still, progress has been steady and roughly in line with what I expected.  A majority of sites have been 3G accepted for quite some time around here, and as that work winded down, the LTE acceptances started to come in.  I did expect a little more progress this summer, but the sites that have been accepted are providing a decent LTE coverage area from what I've experienced.  The pace does not seem to be noticeably behind any other areas of the country (besides those lucky folks who have Shentel).

 

-Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was referring to the same thing.. granted, my area was a First Round market, but still, progress has been steady and roughly in line with what I expected.  A majority of sites have been 3G accepted for quite some time around here, and as that work winded down, the LTE acceptances started to come in.  I did expect a little more progress this summer, but the sites that have been accepted are providing a decent LTE coverage area from what I've expected.  The pace does not seem to be noticeably behind any other areas of the country (besides those lucky folks who have Shentel).

 

-Mike

 

Boston and other ALU markets in the east coast might be ok but it is still pretty slow in the ALU west coast markets.  Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas, Riverside, Orange County, San Diego, east LA still need major progress in LTE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New iphones will support band 26 apple.com/iPhone/lte

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not surprised, u know how apple works. I had a feeling that the iphone wouldnt be tri-band phone, that is really going to hurt the sales. Well for at least the ones that are smart to not buy iphone because of not supposing band 41.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not surprised, u know how apple works. I had a feeling that the iphone wouldnt be tri-band phone, that is really going to hurt the sales. Well for at least the ones that are smart to not buy iphone because of not supposing band 41.

 

I agree hopefully the next model will support the upper band.

 

At least it supports 800mhz lte though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree hopefully the next model will support the upper band.

 

At least it supports 800mhz lte though.

That they did, honestly a lot of people will want that more then band 41. They will want the indoor coverage, which I can't fully blame them. I have a feeling it was design thing, getting in the way. Also I know the iphone has been desiged for awhile and in production. It is hard to switch it out, if they didnt know if sprint was for sure getting clear. We all know it would, but others werent so sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That they did, honestly a lot of people will want that more then band 41. They will want the indoor coverage, which I can't fully blame them. I have a feeling it was design thing, getting in the way. Also I know the iphone has been desiged for awhile and in production. It is hard to switch it out, if they didnt know if sprint was for sure getting clear. We all know it would, but others werent so sure.

 

Exactly. You can't make a business decision about the largest revenue generator in your company on rumors/speculation/hunches. That's not Apple's game, and it never has been.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That they did, honestly a lot of people will want that more then band 41. They will want the indoor coverage, which I can't fully blame them. I have a feeling it was design thing, getting in the way. Also I know the iphone has been desiged for awhile and in production. It is hard to switch it out, if they didnt know if sprint was for sure getting clear. We all know it would, but others werent so sure.

I prefer the indoor coverage too. I just hope they will support band 41 for the next model

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the next iPhone will be out before we start seeing LTE deployed network wide in band 26.  I think band 41 will get there first (it already has a head start).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, is there a plan on the rollout for band 26 and 41? Like which one will get rolled out first? What parts of town (chicago)? I've searched high and low on this site and cant seem to find it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, is there a plan on the rollout for band 26 and 41? Like which one will get rolled out first? What parts of town (chicago)? I've searched high and low on this site and cant seem to find it. 

Chicago is one of the first markets to have band 41, That info is in the 2500/2600 discussion thread(http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4083-sprint-td-lte-25002600mhz-discussion/ ). That is crazy long to go though it all though. I am not a premier member, but they have access to all the 2500/2600 sites, I know chicago has pretty much all of the sites with wimax and lte on 2500/2600. The band 26, if everything goes right. Will be going live on sites the end of the month that is from s4gru(robert), It will be live on all network vision sites that have backhaul. By the end of the year, U can expect samsung to be the first to come out with 800 lte. They were the first with 1x 800 voice and they will be first in 800 lte(band 26). I am would love to see sites live before the iphone comes out. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sprint is deploying 800 megahertz lte and voice to east brunswick its finally here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think 800 will beat 2600 deployment even though 2600 has a head start. Still disappointed the iPhone was not triband.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think 800 will beat 2600 deployment even though 2600 has a head start. Still disappointed the iPhone was not triband.

800 deployment only requires a carrier card and a system update. Doesn't require any new equipment since all of that is already there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

800 deployment only requires a carrier card and a system update. Doesn't require any new equipment since all of that is already there.

Yes therefore I believe the speed will astonish all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sprint is deploying 800 megahertz lte and voice to east brunswick its finally here

How do you know the 800 LTE is there?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By EmeraldReporter
      IBEZ will be solved SOONER, rather than later.
       
      Which is a good thing. I would have liked for SoftBank to join the fight, because EVERYONE knows that their roaming rates are going to be abysmal with Sprint customers traveling to Mexico.
       
      Is this a raw deal? Your thoughts?
       
      Via GigaOM:
      https://gigaom.com/2015/01/26/att-to-buy-nextel-mexico-continuing-continental-expansion/
    • By BlackBerryRulez
      The closest Sprint tower to my house is about 3.5 miles away. In between are hills, trees, a handful of houses, and fields. However, I do have line of sight. I can see the blinking light of the tower in the distance at night. I do not think Sprint has deployed any LTE at this tower. When they do, is it possible that the LTE signal would reach my house?
       
      Right now I have a Moto X, but I may go back to the Q10. I do pick up eHRPD at my house. What frequency is that on? I'm thinking Sprint's 800ish mhz LTE band might. Not sure about 1900 though..
       
      Thanks
    • By burnout8488
      With the extremely fast ramp-up of band 26 deployment in the recent months, a lot of the US is now covered by it. Some markets have been optimized, some haven't. 
       
      For those markets that have seen band 26 optimization, what's your story? Did you used to get a weak 3G connection indoors, and now enjoy a usable 1-2 bar LTE connection? 
       
      Is your 800Mhz LTE connection stronger, the same, or slightly weaker than 3G now? 
       
      Let's try to keep this focused only on stories about areas that have seen a definite coverage improvement as a result of a fully optimized band 26 LTE deployment, not a thread that focuses on where optimization hasn't taken place yet. Perhaps we can boost morale and give us non-optimized folks something to look forward to. :-) 
       
    • By jamescrr
      I'm James from OpenSignal. We're trying to map international rollout of LTE, but very few phones can report the band and bandwidth used, so we're hoping people can help us by firing up field test mode and submitting the data to our map - all the data can be downloaded.
       
      We've already got a great map of South Korea and China, there's a lot of 10 MHz and 20 MHz bands there, which explains why they're clocking some of the fastest LTE speeds on the planet.
       
      You actually need to use "service mode" on Android to do this: 
      Type
      *#0011#
      Into a dialer. 
       
      You should see
       
       

       
       
      Here you can read the LTE stats easily. The Band is 7 (around 2600 MHz), and the LTE Bandwidth for download (LTE DL BW) is 15 MHz. Actually the Earfcn_dl gives a more precise reading of the band, 2825, so if this available use this.
       
       
      You can fill in the form here: Google docs form
      Your data will appear on a map here: LTE bandwidth map.
       
      This won't work for all Android phones, I'm yet to find any other codes that can bring up this info (field test modes & service modes are implemented differently on different devices.  
       
      On iOS try:
      *3001#12345#*[/size]
       
       
      Btw if any admin has the permissions, you can embed the form and map right here:
      Form:
      If that works fill out this form and your information will be automatically mapped:
      Loading…
      All the information is public, and responses are mapped immediately below – you will probably need to refresh this page before your data becomes visible. If it doesn’t appear after that there may be a problem geocoding please email me James (@ opensignal.com) with your observation and we’ll get it up.

      Map of LTE bandwidth. Click on a dot to see the observation. Get the raw data here.
  • Posts

    • Good work. Here are the numbers that were origanally thrown around: https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/a-merged-sprint-t-mobile-will-shutter-25-000-towers-and-crown-castle-will-suffer-most
    • The combined carrier expects to save $26 billion in network costs and another $17 billion in other operating costs while increasing network coverage, particularly in underserved markets; and speeding up its expansion of 5G. Those network savings include $4.2 billion in opex savings from retiring Sprint’s network. New T-Mobile will add Sprint’s mid-band spectrum plus 11,000 cell sites to its network, and those will “provide it with enough additional capacity to meet the markets’ projected growth in data consumption and thus avoid the erosion in quality of service that would result from saturating its existing capacity.” https://www.rcrwireless.com/20200219/carriers/insights-from-the-sprint-t-mobile-us-merger-ruling-part-3 Dish “may utilize any and all cell sites that New T-Mobile would otherwise decommission, gaining access to tens of thousands of cell towers ready for almost immediate use,” and it will also have access to retail stores that New T-Mobile would otherwise close, so it can expand its distribution. Marrero also said that in addition to at least 20,000 towers that New T-Mobile will make available to Dish, Dish “has also identified and signed master service agreements for 32,300 towers that do not need structural reinforcement and thus could become operational in relatively short order.” https://www.rcrwireless.com/20200225/carriers/insights-from-the-sprint-t-mobile-us-merger-ruling-part-5  
    • I'm hoping they do some sort of Merger Briefing soon.    Hopefully they will disclose the game plan with some numbers thrown in... cell sites, moving customers on or so-forth... a lot of what we are going on is information from almost 1-1 1/2 years ago.   When and if they do, it will be a great meeting to tune into for details!  
    • I am not certain this number is still true.  With Dish getting the sites they abandon, the inclination would likely be to retain more Sprint sites. FCC may have forced more rural coverage given 1x800 coverage compared to VoLTE.  We know T-Mobile went through several revisions after those numbers were made public.  Might be better numbers in the merger court decision.
    • Agreed, but I also worry about this autofocus issue because this exists currently on the S10+ that I see occasionally. And it's possible it'll get fixed with software updates, but maybe it's a hardware issue. They changed the way they do their autofocus with the S20 line, so who knows??  I'm trying to get my lease payments cleared up so I can pre-order. As usual, Sprint online says different things than Sprint executive teams. When do the pre-orders stop?? 
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...