Jump to content

Everything 800mhz (1xA, LTE, coverage, timeline, etc)


Recommended Posts

Maybe in this case, they'd refarm the ESMR so they had a pair of 3x3 LTE carriers, instead of 5x5 LTE and a 1xA (1.25x1.25). How big do the guard bands need to be?

 

 

There's more overhead when you have a smaller-bandwidth LTE channel.

 

http://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/wireless-networks-lte-boosts-data-capacity-with-new-wider-bandwidth-spectrum.pdf

 

pg. 9/21

 

I'm not sure of the math but TWO 3x3 may provide less capacity that ONE 5x5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they would, that's exactly my point. Even in 10 years when all the new phones are doing VoLTE, dropping the 1xA carrier on ESMR won't give them enough additional spectrum to enlarge their 5x5 LTE carrier on ESMR. My guess is that this would be the very last CDMA carrier that Sprint will get rid of.

 

Or Sprint can keep that 800 1xA channel forever-ish for M2M and/or really cheap cell phones.

Of course it depends on the cost to Sprint to purchase CDMA base stations (when Verizon stops providing Sprint the economy of its scale) vs the benefit of being able to provide cheap connectivity.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-strikes-m2m-deal-u-blox-targets-atts-2g-shutdown/2013-04-22

http://www.u-blox.com/en/wireless-modules/cdma/fw75.html

 

But the above FW75-C200 module doesn't support CDMA band 10 which is Sprint's ESMR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shutting down 3G? 2G okay, but 3G? No. maybe 15 years lol

Sprint no longer has any "2G," has not for many years.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was talking about Verizon lol

VZW is no different. No "2G." It was all upgraded to at least CDMA1X years ago.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint no longer has any "2G," has not for many years.

 

AJ

 

 

VZW is no different. No "2G." It was all upgraded to at least CDMA1X years ago.

 

AJ

I realize this is a pet peeve of yours and of course you're correct, but because of carrier branding and years of (ab)use of the terminology, most users generally accept 1x as "2G".

 

If you'd like to be technically correct on all fronts, then the entire name of this website is wrong and should be changed to s3gru.com. Neither LTE nor Wimax as deployed by Sprint meet the throughput or IP telephony standards of 4G set forth by the ITU.

 

http://wirelessman.org/liaison/docs/L80216-08_008.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize this is a pet peeve of yours and of course you're correct, but because of carrier branding and years of (ab)use of the terminology, most users generally accept 1x as "2G".

 

If you'd like to be technically correct on all fronts, then the entire name of this website is wrong and should be changed to s3gru.com. Neither LTE nor Wimax as deployed by Sprint meet the throughput or IP telephony standards of 4G set forth by the ITU.

 

http://wirelessman.org/liaison/docs/L80216-08_008.pdf

 

LTE Advanced, however, is 4G and Sprint only needs to software update their base stations to enable that.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize this is a pet peeve of yours and of course you're correct, but because of carrier branding and years of (ab)use of the terminology, most users generally accept 1x as "2G".

 

If you'd like to be technically correct on all fronts, then the entire name of this website is wrong and should be changed to s3gru.com. Neither LTE nor Wimax as deployed by Sprint meet the throughput or IP telephony standards of 4G set forth by the ITU.

 

http://wirelessman.org/liaison/docs/L80216-08_008.pdf

 

Well if we're being technical, the ITU revised their standards to allow WiMAX and LTE to be designated as "4G".

 

http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2010/48.aspx#.UcDCar3HVlM

 

 

As the most advanced technologies currently defined for global wireless mobile broadband communications, IMT-Advanced is considered as “4G”, although it is recognized that this term, while undefined, may also be applied to the forerunners of these technologies, LTE and WiMax, and to other evolved 3G technologies providing a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cuz there's two towers each about 10mi apart from my parents

 

 

Should 800 be active there I wonder which would take over

I have noticed a pretty big difference within a structure. The band also seems quieter since there are not a lot of phones on it yet. At that distance though their are a lot of other issues that come into play. The antenna down tilt at the tower would play a much bigger role.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know when Sprint will sell a phone capable of LTE 800?

http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/21/sprint-announces-three-tri-band-lte-mobile-broadband-devices-to/

 

This fall. LG (Optimus G pro) and Samsung (note 3) will probably be the first Triband LTE phones.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/21/sprint-announces-three-tri-band-lte-mobile-broadband-devices-to/

 

This fall. LG (Optimus G pro) and Samsung (note 3) will probably be the first Triband LTE phones.

 

I don't know if the current LG Optimus G Pro is coming to Sprint this year.  Maybe the LG Optimus G Pro 2 but I doubt that will be released this year.  LG might just have a Spring time release and have a reverse device release schedule than Samsung with a phablet in Spring and flagship phone in Fall vs Samsung who has a flagship phone in Spring and phablet in Fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...