Jump to content
hihater

Network Vision/LTE - Northern Jersey Market

Recommended Posts

I haven't done a speed test in a few weeks. The other day I had painfully slow speeds, ran the speed test and saw 50kbps. The next day to my shock it was over 1Mb/s! I've been noticing significantly faster 3G speeds around Paramus, Clifton, Saddle Brook and neighboring areas. I've measured as fast as 2GB per second on downloads and nearly 1MB per second on uploads. Most of the time it's been hovering around 1 to 1.5MB/s on downloads. These download speeds are at times are 10 times faster than I I normally got in the past lol. This has to be related to Network Vision right? Upgrading the 3G first and then hopefully get LTE soon.

 

 

 

 

223462776.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5G here we come :)

 

I haven't done a speed test in a few weeks. The other day I had painfully slow speeds, ran the speed test and saw 50kbps. The next day to my shock it was over 1Mb/s! I've been noticing significantly faster 3G speeds around Paramus, Clifton, Saddle Brook and neighboring areas. I've measured as fast as 2GB per second on downloads and nearly 1MB per second on uploads. Most of the time it's been hovering around 1 to 1.5MB/s on downloads. These download speeds are at times are 10 times faster than I I normally got in the past lol. This has to be related to Network Vision right? Upgrading the 3G first and then hopefully get LTE soon.

 

 

 

 

223462776.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to hear. I'll have to drive up. I'm right in north Arlington

 

EvoLte via Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I drive route 17 weekly and usually make a stop for gas at a Valero near the Saddle River exit. On Friday evening, my wife and I were driving north on 17 streaming music via Spotify and noticed that the music started getting exceedingly choppy just north of Paramus. By the time we were near Ho-ho-kus, the stream stopped working entirely. At that point I a few speed tests just to make sure it was Sprint and not Spotify. These were done at about 10:00 pm on Friday night starting when I was at that Valero station and ending around the time I passed the Smash Burger in Ramsay.

 

Down: 0.12 Mbps. Up: 0.14 Mbps. Ping: 741 ms.

Down: 0.07 Mbps. Up: 0.55 Mbps. Ping: 361 ms.

Down: 0.09 Mbps. Up: 0.38 Mbps. Ping: 422 ms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I drive route 17 weekly and usually make a stop for gas at a Valero near the Saddle River exit. On Friday evening, my wife and I were driving north on 17 streaming music via Spotify and noticed that the music started getting exceedingly choppy just north of Paramus. By the time we were near Ho-ho-kus, the stream stopped working entirely. At that point I a few speed tests just to make sure it was Sprint and not Spotify. These were done at about 10:00 pm on Friday night starting when I was at that Valero station and ending around the time I passed the Smash Burger in Ramsay.

 

Down: 0.12 Mbps. Up: 0.14 Mbps. Ping: 741 ms.

Down: 0.07 Mbps. Up: 0.55 Mbps. Ping: 361 ms.

Down: 0.09 Mbps. Up: 0.38 Mbps. Ping: 422 ms.

 

Maybe the towers up in Ramsey have not been upgraded or these extremely slow speeds means the are in the process. I noticed pathetically slow speeds and then like magic the next day it was two to four times faster than normal. I was In Park Ridge on Saturday and saw over 1Mb/s. I saw higher speeds around Clifton, Bergen Town Center in Paramus, on route 17 near Garden Stater Plaza. Definitely no fluke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sprint's 3G is spotty and sometimes unusable during the day. I usually get 1Mb or higher anytime from 12 AM to 8 AM.

 

I guess it really depends on how much people are connected to the tower at a specific time of the day.

Edited by HappyHappy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sprint's 3G is spotty and sometimes unusable during the day. I usually get 1Mb or higher anytime from 12 AM to 8 AM.

 

I guess it really depends on how much people are connected to the tower at a specific time of the day.

 

Yes, I've noticed the speeds aren't as fast during the day as it is early in the morning. But it's still way faster, still getting around 1 to 1.5Mbsp instead of over 2Mbps in off peak hours. And not every tower has these speeds. I could go two streets down from my house, and it's slower because it's connecting me to a different tower which may not be upgraded yet. I'm going to run more tests during the week around the area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe the towers up in Ramsey have not been upgraded or these extremely slow speeds means the are in the process. I noticed pathetically slow speeds and then like magic the next day it was two to four times faster than normal. I was In Park Ridge on Saturday and saw over 1Mb/s.  I saw higher speeds around Clifton, Bergen Town Center in Paramus, on route 17 near Garden Stater Plaza. Definitely no fluke.

 

as I said, the poor data started south of Ramsey - basically not long after I entered 17 near the Paramus Ikea; it did get progressively worse as I drove north. I will be passing there again on Thursday, so I'll run some more tests.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I've noticed the speeds aren't as fast during the day as it is early in the morning. But it's still way faster, still getting around 1 to 1.5Mbsp instead of over 2Mbps in off peak hours. And not every tower has these speeds. I could go two streets down from my house, and it's slower because it's connecting me to a different tower which may not be upgraded yet. I'm going to run more tests during the week around the area.

 

 

I am still getting pretty poor 3G speed with my Samsung Galaxy S3. But a few friends who has recently got the latest update from Sprint noticed increase in 3G speed (Sad because I have not gotten the update).

 

At peak hours I get 6 kbs to 221 kbs. Never exceeded 500 kbs mark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems around the same I get here, not too far from you actually :tu:

 

Connected right now to the tower a block and half from my house, I'm getting .59mbps down, and .49mbps up :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Increased speeds in North Jersey" -- is that what you do in your car because you want to get the hell out of there?

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol...we're close enough to NYC without the crap.

 

I love living where I do, ease of commute, a 30 minute bus ride and I'm at work, and a backyard. Oh, and cheap gas I don't have to pump myself like a barbarian.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other day I had painfully slow speeds, ran the speed test and saw 50kbps.

 

 

 

 

You were probably on 1xrtt data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You were probably on 1xrtt data.

 

No it was EvdoA. Not sure if these upgrades is part of Network Vision or just a band aid fix. But I have been pleasantly surprised with the better service. I don't see improvements being widespread, just in certain areas, fortunately where I live and work the speeds are much improved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

alright, I drove 17 north on Thursday evening (8:20pm) and ran some speed tests. between the Paramus Ikea(where I enter 17 from 4) and the Linwood Avenue exit, I pulled the following speeds (in Mbps):

 

0.85 Down. 0.72 Up. Ping: 98ms

1.37 Down. 0.65 Up. Ping: 115ms

1.11 Down. 0.80 Up. Ping: 89ms

 

not as fast as what was reported earlier in this thread, but still fairly decent. things began to drop off considerably as I moved north of Ho-Ho-Kus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was at garden State plaza sat noonish. Horrible speed all day in the mall. My phone was dead by sundown. Was getting full signal everywhere except the theater. Next time I'll do speed test.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

alright, I drove 17 north on Thursday evening (8:20pm) and ran some speed tests. between the Paramus Ikea(where I enter 17 from 4) and the Linwood Avenue exit, I pulled the following speeds (in Mbps):

 

0.85 Down. 0.72 Up. Ping: 98ms

1.37 Down. 0.65 Up. Ping: 115ms

1.11 Down. 0.80 Up. Ping: 89ms

 

not as fast as what was reported earlier in this thread, but still fairly decent. things began to drop off considerably as I moved north of Ho-Ho-Kus.

 

Those speeds are what I have seen also, around 1 to 1.5MB. You can get 2+MB/s speeds early or late in the day. The other day I was getting 2.3MB/s at 9PM in Saddle Brook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You get 4g continually? or you got it like once? screencaps?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4G LTE or 4G Wimax?

 

Seriously if that's the case I'm taking a road trip this weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4G LTE or 4G Wimax?

 

Seriously if that's the case I'm taking a road trip this weekend.

 

I've received several reports of live LTE in the Old Bridge/Manalapan/Marlboro/Freehold FIT area.

 

Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is discoverable, I'll make a drive out, going to be in the general area next week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it just me or did the nj lte map get a slight bump sensorly?

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it just me or did the nj lte map get a slight bump sensorly?

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2

 

The FIT area has had 4G LTE active for quite a long time. So the coverage in Sensorly in the Freehold/Marlboro area has grown a little bit every few weeks.

 

Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Akron, OH - Median download speed increased from 22.7Mbps to 30.8Mbps.  Baltimore, MD - Median download speed increased from 24.4Mbps to 32.8Mbps.  Charlotte, NC - Median download speed increased from 14.7Mbps to 22Mbps.  Des Moines, IA - Median download speed increased from 16.8Mbps to 23.8Mbps. Fort Meyers, FL - Median download speed decreased from 15.5Mbps to 8.6Mbps. Mobile, AL - Median download speed increased from 18Mbps to 29.9Mbps. 
    • Sprint can't afford to go private, they can't afford to buy back shares from stockholders, going private won't happen.  Either the merger will pass (60/40 chance at this point), if not Son will find a buyer for Sprint and take a loss (hello WeWork) and as a trader the way Sprint's shares are trading its almost as if market makers are already pricing in a merger failure.  Sprint would have to do some serious trimming off its balance sheet, sale portions of its network and subs, or even file Chapter 11.  I don't really see Sprint filing bankruptcy I've seen companies with worse earnings and survive.  Son just wants out of the U.S. wireless market and merging with T-Mobile is the fastest way to do so all while pitching this "5G for all" bs <--- I don't even have faith in T-Mobile post merger if it happens.  Sprint needs someone with deep pockets like Altice or another large cable company (and most certainly not Dish). 
    • Yes, some of you disagree with me.  That's to be expected.  Sprint sucks in some places.  But Sprint is not only great in my area, but they're actually the best.  And in most metro areas, they are perfectly usable.  But guess what?  T-mobile sucks in many places.  And I can tell you here in their home market, they're the worst carrier.  Verizon also stinks in places too.  I suppose if I lived in a crappy Sprint market, I'd go.  But I can tell you I see more and more people who leave Sprint and either come back or even if they don't, admit that the network wasn't as bad as they thought and there was a complete over dramatization in the disparity in networks.  Everybody's gotta do what's best for themselves.  And if leaving Sprint is best for you, I certainly wouldn't hold it against anyone.  I've seen many go over the years.  And I still sit here plugging away behind the keyboard.  But the one thing that won't continue is the overly negative drumbeat that's happening in this thread.  You all are starting to build off each other's negativity, causing the conversation to become one sided and pointless.  Don't want to hear ad infinitum the same droll negative grumblings.  Especially the same 'ol criticisms and Sprint can't be trusted.  Frankly, the drama is not true.  Sprint took longer, yes, but it did upgrade its network, and the performance is better.  And on the whole, it's better than its ever been.  So it cannot be said Sprint didn't do it.  They did. So let's stick to the thread discussion, which is the merger.  Not on the network performance on Lower Botswana Avenue and your thoughts on changing networks because of your block. Robert 
    • Boost founder has already said he would pay $2b for the brand back. 
    • Hi, Robert While I see your points, I respectfully disagree with some of them.  Properly managed, Sprint does have the resources to compete successfully.  But the key phrase is "properly managed", and that's where Sprint has shown critical weakness time and time again. Since Dan Hesse was screwed over in the Metro PCS debacle, and then dumped after Softbank took over, Sprint hasn't shown any signs of intelligent strategic management.  Tactically, they have tried hard to succeed, and have kept up with technology, and have tried to keep up with deployments.  But Softbank's refusal to provide capital (either directly or through 3rd parties), Claure's ham-handed cost cutting,  and Masa's tunnel-vision focus on merger have all combined to put Sprint in a desperate situation. So I agree with you that Sprint could compete in the future, but I think it is unrealistic to expect Masayoshi and Softbank to actually try to compete.  If the merger fails, I think that it is far more likely that Masa will basically dump Sprint just like he dumped Hesse, and loyal Sprint employees and the few remaining independent stockholders will be left swinging in the wind.  Sprint customers (I've been with Sprint for 20+ years) will also be hung out to dry.  I hope that I am wrong.  Actually, I hope the merger goes through, but if it doesn't, then I hope that I am wrong.  But I'm not counting on it.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...