Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Northern Jersey Market


hihater

Recommended Posts

On 9/3/2018 at 1:40 PM, ingenium said:

Found a ton of the strand mounts from the Altice partnership in your market. They're everywhere around Saddle River.IMG_20180903_092747.jpeg5038e7f4852d86fc150a882a14241ff7.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

How many sites would you guess and how far is each node from another? Any more pictures? This is an Airspan Airstrand 1300 small cell. There should be close to 15k of these nodes around the US in addition to the pole mounted nodes from Mobilitie. Not sure who is contracted to install these on the strands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many sites would you guess and how far is each node from another? Any more pictures? This is an Airspan Airstrand 1300 small cell. There should be close to 15k of these nodes around the US in addition to the pole mounted nodes from Mobilitie. Not sure who is contracted to install these on the strands.
Sorry, no more pictures. I detected most of them at night via SCP. I'd guess there are at least 100, about a block apart.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ejlwireless said:

How many sites would you guess and how far is each node from another? Any more pictures? This is an Airspan Airstrand 1300 small cell. There should be close to 15k of these nodes around the US in addition to the pole mounted nodes from Mobilitie. Not sure who is contracted to install these on the strands.

These are Altice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Looks like Sprint is finally ripping and replacing Clear sites in Northern NJ.

Here by Weehawken, went from a single carrier Clear site, which did okish during offpeak times(30-50mbs) and (2-10mb peak) to 200mbs+ offpeak and 80mbs+ during peak times.

Good stuff!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
33 minutes ago, jamesinclair said:

The dead zones along the northeast corridor are ridiculous. Speeds are so bad between Elizabeth and Newark I cant even load the app to report slow data.

You can manually report the problem locations in the My Sprint App at a later time by entering the address where it happened.

I've been bugging people I know at Sprint to enable a "pin drop" function on the Map so that you wouldn't have to have an exact address to make a report. Hopefully they do this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RedSpark said:

You can manually report the problem locations in the My Sprint App at a later time by entering the address where it happened.

I've been bugging people I know at Sprint to enable a "pin drop" function on the Map so that you wouldn't have to have an exact address to make a report. Hopefully they do this.

That would be so useful holy crap. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/16/2019 at 5:21 PM, RedSpark said:

You can manually report the problem locations in the My Sprint App at a later time by entering the address where it happened.

I've been bugging people I know at Sprint to enable a "pin drop" function on the Map so that you wouldn't have to have an exact address to make a report. Hopefully they do this.

Good to know. As you said, a pin would be even better because being a railroad, there are no addresses. So Ill have to find a nearby property.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 1 month later...

Drove out to Mt. Arlington, NJ and Kenvil, NJ and was surprised by how good T-Mobile's coverage was both on the drive there and while out and about. I was on 5G what seemed like 98% of the the drive out there. I only noticed one time when it dropped down to LTE for less than a mile before picking up 5G and staying on it for the rest of the drive. 

I was even more impressed by performance within both towns as speeds and coverage were similar to, if not better than Verizon in most areas I went. This includes indoors. While at a restaurant, Verizon dropped down to 1 bar of LTE and occasionally lost signal completely while my T-Mobile line bounced between 1-2 bars of LTE without ever dropping completely in the same location. Looking at Cellmapper, almost every site in the area has every Band 2/12/66/71 and n71 so T-Mobile has tons of capacity for this area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

T-Mobile has been doing lots of upgrades in North Jersey to increase density through Sprint conversions and organically building new sites. I've been identifying some on Cellmapper.

Sprint Conversions: 

  1. eNB 874744 (Location: 40.884324553470826, -74.06894151337626)
  2. eNB 875135 (Location: 40.87586452482414, -74.06618163727573)

New Builds:

  1. eNB 891761 (Location: 40.92465135307351, -73.96688969812453)
  2. eNB 894907 (Location: 40.89930669860068, -73.9708909875452)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hoboken is littered with small cells on all 3 carriers.

AT&T's small cells look similar to what they deploy on utility poles in NYC but performance can be hit or miss. They all have great range, covering up to  similar to what I see in Brooklyn but speeds vary widely. On some, I'll get 110Mbps and on others I'll only get 20Mbps.

Verizon's has blanketed much of Hoboken in small cells as well. Almost every small cell has a combo of mmWave, CBRS, and Band 2/66. Here's what they look like. Like AT&T they have decent range and thanks to how small, dense, and lax w/ regard to small cell regulation Hoboken is, you're never too far from another mmWave node. I was peaking at around 1.4Gbps just driving around the city.

T-Mobile has deployed these Ericsson Band 2/46/66 strand-mount small cells and they're all insanely fast. It's my understanding that newer T-Mobile nodes in NYC are using the same antennas but have them in an RF transparent enclosure due to city regulations. That way they don't have to install an antenna on top of the pole, though they do sacrifice coverage a bit when doing so. Speeds are great on them though, easily over 500Mbps and in some areas so densely deployed that you just hop from small cell to small cell without ever touching a macro. Recently Extenet has also been deploying some new cantenna-styled small cells for T-Mobile in Hoboken. They have really great range like a mini-macro but I didn't get to test performance at all and I'm not certain if they also have LAA.

— — — — —

Here's a pic of a T-Mobile strand mount I connected to along w/ speeds.

PgaC4Or.jpgLZBW5Hv.png

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...