Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Kentucky Market (Lexington)


Recommended Posts

Posted

Lots of white vans and heavy trucks out this past week, and many with spools of fiber in the back. I don't know if it's all Sprint related but theres a lot of fiber work being done in Danville/Richmond this week.

 

In the sponsor section of the site I have posted pictures of work going on in Lexington. Confirmed 1 site has Panels, RRUs, and Cabinets installed but not active.

 

Possible work on at least 2 more sites.

  • Like 3
Posted

In the sponsor section of the site I have posted pictures of work going on in Lexington. Confirmed 1 site has Panels, RRUs, and Cabinets installed but not active.

 

Possible work on at least 2 more sites.

 

Good news indeed!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I don't know if everyone got this but last night I got an notification from the Sprint Zone app saying "The All New Sprint Network is Coming to Your Area". I'm not sure if that was a system wide notification or an actual Lexington area one. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't know if everyone got this but last night I got an notification from the Sprint Zone app saying "The All New Sprint Network is Coming to Your Area". I'm not sure if that was a system wide notification or an actual Lexington area one.

 

I received the same notification here in Santa Fe, NM via Sprint Zone.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I received the same notification here in Santa Fe, NM via Sprint Zone.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Robert - is your gut feeling that this is truly the beginning of the start for both markets (Santa Fe and Lexington)?  They are both 3rd round if I recall correctly and about the same size (not that city size is relevant in deployment as previously demonstrated).  To be clear - was it a system wide notification or is it really the start of NV?

Posted

 

Robert - is your gut feeling that this is truly the beginning of the start for both markets (Santa Fe and Lexington)? They are both 3rd round if I recall correctly and about the same size (not that city size is relevant in deployment as previously demonstrated). To be clear - was it a system wide notification or is it really the start of NV?

Work is starting here now. I cannot say with 100% certainty that the message was geographically targeted to specific NV areas. But I have heard enough widespread reports that I have my doubts.

 

Work is going on in the East Kentucky and New Mexico markets right now regardless. We have had a verified site sighting near Lexington and I seen one myself in New Mexico. It's beginning!

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Where is the completed tower in Lexington? ( I know it currently isn't broadcasting LTE)

 

It is not completed, it is in progress. It is shown on the sponsor maps in the sponsor section of our site.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Posted

You guys in Lexington shouldnt feel bad......Middlesboro has been marked in progress for over 4 months now. It is definitely Ericsson/Sprint dragging their feet here because backhaul is certainly in place. Verizon has been broadcasting lte for several months here on the same tower.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Posted

You guys in Lexington shouldnt feel bad......Middlesboro has been marked in progress for over 4 months now. It is definitely Ericsson/Sprint dragging their feet here because backhaul is certainly in place. Verizon has been broadcasting lte for several months here on the same tower.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Verizon does not give it's backhaul to other carriers. Sprint has to bring in their own. Verizon frequently uses microwave to their rural LTE sites.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Posted

 

You guys in Lexington shouldnt feel bad......Middlesboro has been marked in progress for over 4 months now. It is definitely Ericsson/Sprint dragging their feet here because backhaul is certainly in place. Verizon has been broadcasting lte for several months here on the same tower.

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

 

Verizon does not give it's backhaul to other carriers. Sprint has to bring in their own. Verizon frequently uses microwave to their rural LTE sites.

 

 

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

 

 

I was told that both Verizon and Sprint would be using AT&T fiber at this site. The tower is also located directly beside the AT&T switching building. Obviously, info could be wrong but it did come from an local AT&T emloyee....

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Posted

 

 

 

You guys in Lexington shouldnt feel bad......Middlesboro has been marked in progress for over 4 months now. It is definitely Ericsson/Sprint dragging their feet here because backhaul is certainly in place. Verizon has been broadcasting lte for several months here on the same tower.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

 

 

 

 

Verizon does not give it's backhaul to other carriers. Sprint has to bring in their own. Verizon frequently uses microwave to their rural LTE sites.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I was told that both Verizon and Sprint would be using AT&T fiber at this site. The tower is also located directly beside the AT&T switching building. Obviously, info could be wrong but it did come from an local AT&T emloyee....

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Sprint may or may not be using AT&T at that location. They are using dozens of backhaul vendors and only uses AT&T when they have to. Even if they are using AT&T, they were delayed in getting started in the market. They're only really getting started now.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm super stoked about this.  I think Sprint (well, their subcontractors) have really kicked it into high gear since the weather warmed up this spring.  I just wish the rest of the nation knew what we did - that most major metros DO have some accessible LTE in their areas, it's just that it has yet to be announced!  Speaking of, when do you think Sprint will make another major announcement?  Philly, DC, Miami, OKC, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Memphis, NOLA and NYC and San Fran I would think are all about where they need to be for an an "official" unveling.  Again, I know it means little to us but it does to the masses.  I would love for everyone to quit saying that Sprint's LTE coverage sucks.  It actually doesn't..it's just that not many people are aware of it.  And, soon enough, even places like Middlesboro and Lexington, KY will have decent LTE coverage.  Bring it!

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

What's going on in East Kentucky market these days?  Does Sprint (Ericsson) typically update all the towers in a market more or less simultaneously?  I'm moving to a rural enough area to not have landline based internet service and I'm wondering if LTE will be coming to the Frankfort/Lawrenceburg area soon enough that I should sign up with Millenicom instead of going the WISP route (25GB soft cap vs. 50GB sort-of-soft cap and faster speeds).

Posted

I don't know where to ask. I live in Winchester ky on the sprint nv site it shows the tower less then 2 miles from my house but I only have 1 bar on my iPhone5 and just about everywhere in Winchester I bounce from sprint to extended. The map shows updates to the tower which about 3 months ago it didn't even show we had a tower here. I can see the tower from my place when them leafs are dead it's not a new tower you think it might not be turned on or they just have the wrong location on nv

Posted

I don't know where to ask. I live in Winchester ky on the sprint nv site it shows the tower less then 2 miles from my house but I only have 1 bar on my iPhone5 and just about everywhere in Winchester I bounce from sprint to extended. The map shows updates to the tower which about 3 months ago it didn't even show we had a tower here. I can see the tower from my place when them leafs are dead it's not a new tower you think it might not be turned on or they just have the wrong location on nv

I assume the nv site your talking about is network.sprint.com

 

If so, that site doesn't just show NV upgrades, is shows legacy "band-aid" upgrades as well.

Posted

You guys do realize that an LTE site supposedly went live in the East Kentucky market this week, right?  I tried to find it on the map but it doesn't seem to be showing.  I've contacted Robert for further clarification.  The information is on the latest acceptance reports from yesterday. 

Posted

You guys do realize that an LTE site supposedly went live in the East Kentucky market this week, right?  I tried to find it on the map but it doesn't seem to be showing.  I've contacted Robert for further clarification.  The information is on the latest acceptance reports from yesterday. 

 

It won't show up on the map until the next refresh.

  • Like 1
Posted

You guys do realize that an LTE site supposedly went live in the East Kentucky market this week, right? I tried to find it on the map but it doesn't seem to be showing. I've contacted Robert for further clarification. The information is on the latest acceptance reports from yesterday.

 

It's on there now. It was supposed to be on the last refresh. It looks like I made an error and forgot to log it.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Posted

It's on there now. It was supposed to be on the last refresh. It looks like I made an error and forgot to log it.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Which map should it be posted on? I live very close to this area and would like to go check out the location.  Also I just made a donation via paypal. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Vinegar Hill is getting the Brooklyn Heights treatment now with regard to small cells. I mapped two more small cells in the neighborhood in the past few days so now T-Mobile is up to 8 of them in such a tiny neighborhood. While it's cool they're doing this since it means outdoors you get a consistent 400Mbps+ almost everywhere, it sucks because they're obviously deploying so many of them to make up for their lack of a macro site in the entire neighborhood. Because there isn't a macro, the small cells have a greater coverage area than you see in other neighborhoods and you often connect to them while indoors but coverage and speeds fall off indoors much faster on small cells than on macros in my experience.  Even Dish has better coverage than T-Mobile in Vinegar Hill since they added the site on top of the Extra Space Storage building alongside AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile needs to get in line with their competitors there.
    • It seems like that is the smallest Google Play System change that google releases. I see 12 MB updates really regularly. 
    • Went back to Greenville last week and what an insane change 4 years has made! Every site in the city has n25/41/71 now and T-Mobile has even added new sites in the city since the last time I was there. As a result, their coverage and speeds are great everywhere. Unfortunately I don't have my Verizon line anymore so I'm unable to compare their performance to T-Mobile but they definitely had better coverage and speeds than AT&Tin my testing.  On the LTE side of things, T-Mobile has 5MHz Band 71, 10MHz Band 66, and 5MHz Band 2 deployed. On the 5G side, they have 190MHz n41, 15MHz n25, and 15MHz n71 deployed. As you'd expect 5G is several times faster than LTE here because of that. One thing I noticed though is that T-Mobile's speeds pretty much never go above 1Gbps here. I'm not sure if it's a backhaul limitation or if they're seriously pushing their 5G home internet product here but on most sites I was seeing 500-600Mbps with some sites having peaks in the high 800s-low 900's. I also noticed that upload speeds weren't nearly as good as they were in NYC. I attribute this to the fact that site spacing often cause the phone to drop to n25 or n71 for uploads as opposed to using n41. I have a handful of high (>100Mbps) upload speed tests but that was with me virtually right next to a site. Since I drove my own car instead of riding with family, I used the opportunity to map a ton of rural roads outside to Greenville to see what kind of coverage I'd get. T-Mobile has stepped up their game a ton in this regard as I found that coverage matched and in many cases surpassed what I was seeing on AT&T. areas where AT&T dropped to 1 bar or even no signal, I held onto weak n71 and was still able to place calls using VoNR. There are still areas where I would drop signal but those were areas where I'm certain the only carrier available was U.S. Cellular since they still have a ton of macros that they're the only tenant on. The U.S. Cellular merger won't add much to T-Mobile's spectrum coffers there; they'll increase 600MHz from 20MHz to 30MHz, gain another 10MHz of AWS, and acquire the rest of the 24GHz band, but they'll gain a ton new sites to bolster their rural coverage in this area and make it pretty much the best in the region.  — — — — — I also mapped Dish while down there. Dish's doesn't have much spectrum in Pitt County, they only have 5MHz n71, 25MHz n70 and 5MHz n29. This lack of spectrum combined with what is pretty much a skeleton/license protection network meant that in most cases I was only on 1-2 bars of n71 indoors and while outdoors I wasn't seeing speeds nearly as good as I get in NYC. While directly in front of a site I could get over 300Mbps but in most cases while out and about I wasn't seeing over 100Mbps. In fact, at my hotel I was only able to get about 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up on n71. Maybe as they densify I'll see more consistently high speeds but their lack of spectrum will remain a huge bottleneck much like it was for T-Mobile pre-Sprint merger. — — — — — AT&T and Verizon are the only carriers with small cells in Greenville. Verizon has a significantly larger deployment than AT&T though, with AT&T having it along some roads where they have weaker coverage while Verizon seems to be using them for added capacity Uptown and especially around ECU. They started being installed around 2019 but none of them have 5G as far as I can tell, only LTE. AT&T also has C-band and DoD deployed on every site in the city, giving me speeds in the range of 350-400Mbps in most areas. — — — — — Here are some photos of small cells in Greenville.  
    • Just checked and found a 12MB Google Play System update ready to download.    Still October 1 for the date after however. 
    • Looks like my little area finally has some decent mobile connectivity. Still have a few dead spots on both tmo and firstnet... https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10549791800  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...