Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

It all depends when they start it. They had to wait to launch LTE plus in NYC until the judge approved the ordeal since they had to wait for WiMAX contracts to expire before launching it. It took them 2 months to cover the entire city so my guess is they'll cover all if not most of el Paso in a couple weeks since it's not rip and replace and the equipment is actually at the sites ready to go.

 

No that's not quite how it works Brynn. In NYC, they had been deploying equipment for well over a year, and the Clearwire equipment was already in place so that was mainly software changes. In your area, it has been way more than 2 months to get widespread Band 41 coverage. 

 

In El Paso, there is no existing Band 41 equipment. It still has to be added. Each site can take anywhere from a couple of days to a couple of week to upgrade. And that doesn't take into account the red tape (permits, schedules and whatnot). Unless they do an all out assault on El Paso with 10+ crews simultaneously working, it will take more than a few weeks. Several months, if that. However, as each site goes live, it will have huge impacts on the surrounding network, and it may not take 100% site conversion to produce a very usable network. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No that's not quite how it works Brynn. In NYC, they had been deploying equipment for well over a year, and the Clearwire equipment was already in place so that was mainly software changes. In your area, it has been way more than 2 months to get widespread Band 41 coverage.

 

In El Paso, there is no existing Band 41 equipment. It still has to be added. Each site can take anywhere from a couple of days to a couple of week to upgrade. And that doesn't take into account the red tape (permits, schedules and whatnot). Unless they do an all out assault on El Paso with 10+ crews simultaneously working, it will take more than a few weeks. Several months, if that. However, as each site goes live, it will have huge impacts on the surrounding network, and it may not take 100% site conversion to produce a very usable network.

 

 

 

Ahh gotcha, so how long would it take to launch El Paso at full band 41 strength ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No that's not quite how it works Brynn. In NYC, they had been deploying equipment for well over a year, and the Clearwire equipment was already in place so that was mainly software changes. In your area, it has been way more than 2 months to get widespread Band 41 coverage.

 

In El Paso, there is no existing Band 41 equipment. It still has to be added. Each site can take anywhere from a couple of days to a couple of week to upgrade. And that doesn't take into account the red tape (permits, schedules and whatnot). Unless they do an all out assault on El Paso with 10+ crews simultaneously working, it will take more than a few weeks. Several months, if that. However, as each site goes live, it will have huge impacts on the surrounding network, and it may not take 100% site conversion to produce a very usable network.

Yup! El paso is just harder place to build out a network, why idk! Its also a lot harder to get permits approved.. i remember one tower had a bird nest on it and they couldn't touch it until the bird nest left on its own lol. Im think 6 months. Im sure they want to at least get to 70 %

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup! El paso is just harder place to build out a network, why idk! Its also a lot harder to get permits approved.. i remember one tower had a bird nest on it and they couldn't touch it until the bird nest left on its own lol. Im think 6 months. Im sure they want to at least get to 70 %

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

This timeline is not just specific to El Paso but every city/market where no band 41 exists. It will take this long in Abq, Santa Fe and Farmington. It is just the way it goes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This timeline is not just specific to El Paso but every city/market where no band 41 exists. It will take this long in Abq, Santa Fe and Farmington. It is just the way it goes.

Have you seen any more permits for Albuquerque?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sprint steady declining.. t mobile did as well.. verizon is the biggest improvement

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Verizon is probably using small cells. They could be using CA too. I have yet to confirm anyone using CA on Verizon anywhere in the U.S. I dont know if they are using it yet but the way there speeds are increasing I would say they might be.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon is probably using small cells. They could be using CA too. I have yet to confirm anyone using CA on Verizon anywhere in the U.S. I dont know if they are using it yet but the way there speeds are increasing I would say they might be.

Yeah the only two that improved were AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile decreased and Sprint decreased. Looking at permits Verizon is adding a lot of new towers I don't know if those could be small cells. Sprint is adding new Towers but not adding any b41 or b26. T-Mobile's Trend here on quarterly basis is increase decrease increase decrease I wonder why

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there anywhere to confirm what sprint's network vision completition percentage is for el paso?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

No. EP is included in the market. I have a map but it is outdated if they have completed towers in the last six months.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice! They have done a few.. are they at least above 80%.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

My last update was about beginning of November 16, 2015 as that was the most recent update to the NVSites Completed Maps in the sponsor section.  EP was at 87% of sites had the 3G updates and 82% had LTE accepted.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Median speed is 0.6mbps for El Paso? That is completely unacceptable!!! And I thought North Florida has it bad. At least some areas have 5+mbps. :o

West side of U.S. in general has it worse than the east of the U.S.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More geographically challenging as 1.9 and 2.5 don't travel well. Nothing will change until 800mhz rebanding is complete

800 will not solve all of the problems on the west coast it will be a temp bandaid fix at best for capacity. For coverage it will be a really big help though.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

800 will not solve all of the problems on the west coast it will be a temp bandaid fix at best for capacity. For coverage it will be a really big help though.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

That's what I meant for coverage. I'm in SoCal now and coverage decent. 800 plus small cells is the icing on the cake

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

800 will not solve all of the problems on the west coast it will be a temp bandaid fix at best for capacity. For coverage it will be a really big help though.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Band 26 helped greatly for Albuquerque. Hard part is EP is only one band 25 5x5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop complaining. That's a double in capacity and a hell of a lot better than not having it.

Thats not complaining thats logic. Verizon, At&t and Tmobile started with 10x10 and did it last long for them? No. Its double capacity but when capacity was low to begin with its not impressive. Its not even catching up. Once a second carrier band 25 or band 41 with small cells are deployed but until then you are about to be severely disappointed if you think even for a second that 800 is going to solve capacity issues. If it does its only a temp fix.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...