Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

Again I can't guarantee that but if El Paso gets this 20x20 PCS which the FCC will likely approve then Sprint is going to be a good option within the next 2 years. I wouldn't recommend Sprint at the moment in El Paso since most of the market looks to be 5x5 PCS and that's it. Obviously that doesn't cut it in 2016.

Well, sprint gave the 20×20 pcs to t mobile in the swap.. to gain more pcs spectrum in higher priority markets

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, sprint gave the 20×20 pcs to t mobile in the swap.. to gain more pcs spectrum in higher priority markets

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

My bad hehehe. So even without PCS eventually 3xCA band 41 will be just fine also. It's a matter of how long. El Paso doesn't seem to be a high priority market to Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bad hehehe. So even without PCS eventually 3xCA band 41 will be just fine also. It's a matter of how long. El Paso doesn't seem to be a high priority market to Sprint.

Exactly.... and test driving t mobile with the congestion isn't much better....who will fix it first in your opinion t mobile or sprint

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly.... and test driving t mobile with the congestion isn't much better....who will fix it first in your opinion t mobile or sprint

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

I don't know what kind of voodoo magic T-Mobile engineers do here in Florida but they started almost a year after Sprint and leaped over them in data speed. Sprint is just not as fast at deployment as them so I will say T-Mobile. Plus the fact that T-Mobile is trying to get 40mhz of PCS there tells me that its a higher priority market to them than it is for Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, sprint gave the 20×20 pcs to t mobile in the swap.. to gain more pcs spectrum in higher priority markets

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Sprint received spectrum as well, putting them in a better position in El Paso. A second carrier will be possible once the trading is complete.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint received spectrum as well, putting them in a better position in El Paso. A second carrier will be possible once the trading is complete.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

What would be the turn around...how long would it take to go live

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what kind of voodoo magic T-Mobile engineers do here in Florida but they started almost a year after Sprint and leaped over them in data speed. Sprint is just not as fast at deployment as them so I will say T-Mobile. Plus the fact that T-Mobile is trying to get 40mhz of PCS there tells me that its a higher priority market to them than it is for Sprint.

Which device do you use ?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I phones 6s plus are the radios really bad

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

No they are good but not as good as the note 5. My friend has a iphone 6s plus on Sprint and his LTE signal is never as good as mine

And I mean "never".

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they are good but not as good as the note 5. My friend has a iphone 6s plus on Sprint and his LTE signal is never as good as mine

And I mean "never".

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

I wonder why...would it make a difference on what carrier you are on... im getting the i phone 6s plus for t mobile

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why...would it make a difference on what carrier you are on... im getting the i phone 6s plus for t mobile

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Rf performance is completely different for any carrier or device. No device is the same. The iphone on tmobile rf could be amazing on tmobile but average on Verizon. The fcc docs tell you but it does not always match up. Example the Sprint Note 5 wqs suppose to be average on all bands but real world reports say that they are much better than what the fcc tested. There is no way of knowing until you have the device. How I determine is I go to the store and look at all of the rf performance on each device. Its the best way in my opinion. Just make sure they are connected to the same tower and sector.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint received spectrum as well, putting them in a better position in El Paso. A second carrier will be possible once the trading is complete.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Can this be added by software since these are network vision sites or will it require visits to the towers?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29595d1cd1cf6a72a69227da8d6f346c.jpg 700 mhz on band 2 can't be??

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

EARFCN of 700 indicates a center downlink frequency of 1940mhz and a center uplink frequency of 1860mhz. Looks like it's in the a block.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rf performance is completely different for any carrier or device. No device is the same. The iphone on tmobile rf could be amazing on tmobile but average on Verizon. The fcc docs tell you but it does not always match up. Example the Sprint Note 5 wqs suppose to be average on all bands but real world reports say that they are much better than what the fcc tested. There is no way of knowing until you have the device. How I determine is I go to the store and look at all of the rf performance on each device. Its the best way in my opinion. Just make sure they are connected to the same tower and sector.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

does tmo support multi band CA, aren't their antennae/rrh limited to legacy builds?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, consistent Tmo discussion belongs in another thread. Thanks.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just saw the rootmetrics report for ABQ for the 1st half 2016.  Really depressing.

I'd say so too. Wow! Didn't even win anything. =/ Come on Sprint, get your butts moving!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My buddy at sprint said..." the reason sprint is stalling on network upgrades in el paso/Albuquerque, because there market share is so slim that they wouldn't see a return on investment. It would be a lose lose situation. He said the only thing they might do this year is convert remaining legacy sites and that's about it...any opinions ??

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My buddy at sprint said..." the reason sprint is stalling on network upgrades in el paso/Albuquerque, because there market share is so slim that they wouldn't see a return on investment. It would be a lose lose situation. He said the only thing they might do this year is convert remaining legacy sites and that's about it...any opinions ??

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Completing the remaining legacy sites would be good. Im not surprised that Sprint has a low market share. Just remember, someone always has to be last. Sadly the Albuquerque market is one of those markets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completing the remaining legacy sites would be good. Im not surprised that Sprint has a low market share. Just remember, someone always has to be last. Sadly the Albuquerque market is one of those markets.

I did see the Albuquerque report. Performance is down from the last report. I did hear him say Albuquerque is getting band 26. Any new activity on that?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...