Jump to content

iPhone 5 frequencies + HD voice


iansltx

Recommended Posts

No comment on that one. <digi puts his index cards of iphone disadvantages away>

 

lol. Sorry, my Viper started overheating by itself today again. I'm not happy with it, so this announcement is kind of convincing for me to get it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

.....

Version #2 (A1429 CDMA) is the Sprint + Verizon edition. 2100, 1800, Cellular, upper 700, PCS+G

This is the most interesting model of the three IMO. Despite SpectrumCo, there's no AWS here for Verizon. There is, however, support for a band that Verizon probably won't launch for several years: LTE in Cellular. I'm sure this was due to KDDI needing the band, but it's entertaining nonetheless. And of course Sprint's current LTE deployment is fully supported, though LTE in SMR or 2500 isn't.

 

...

 

Does this mean it might be possible, if you bought a Verizon or Sprint iPhone 5, to one day take it to the other carrier and have it activated? Not that I'd want to do that, or even that I'd want an iPhone 5. Just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this mean it might be possible, if you bought a Verizon or Sprint iPhone 5, to one day take it to the other carrier and have it activated? Not that I'd want to do that, or even that I'd want an iPhone 5. Just curious.

 

Yes if you can get the prior service provider to unlock the phone from its network restrictions. Theres also a device you can use with the 4S to unlock the phone for any carrier in the world, its just a different sim card tray

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I have looked and looked but cannot find in the FCC filings any clear indication of SVDO capability. Take that for what you will.

 

AJ

 

In my opinion, it would be kind of retarded if it didn't, seeing as how the mdm9615 is the most advanced lte modem on the market.

They also posted on engadget that a sprint spokesperson stated that it won't be compatible with HD voice because its HD voice implementation uses wcdma and the iPhone doesn't have 1xa...but this statement is also retarded to me, because it seems the 9615 can do EVERYTHING except wimax...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just the chipset that has to support SVDO, the phone itself will have to support it with a separate receive/transmit path for EVDO and 1x voice. It does have SVDO capabilities between 1x and LTE.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with LTE bands 1, 3 and 5 included, once LTE roaming gets set up, the Sprint and Verizon iPhones are actually superior international devices (except for Canada) than AT&T's iPhone :lol: ! That's a radical departure from the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just the chipset that has to support SVDO, the phone itself will have to support it with a separate receive/transmit path for EVDO and 1x voice. It does have SVDO capabilities between 1x and LTE.

 

You are right. I just hope that even if HD voice is not supported, SVDO is, because all of sprints new LTE hands support it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's SVLTE guys as Robert pointed out. SVDO is Voice/EVDO. SVLTE is more likely to be supported as there is not an extra cost as there will already be separate antennas for 1x/evdo and LTE.

 

Also regarding HD Voice, as you've probably seen the Iphone 5 does not support Sprint/CDMA HD Voice. This is due to the fact that the Iphone does not support the EVRC-NW codec. They do support the gsm AMR-WB HD Voice codec, however.

 

I wish that Sprint's HD Voice used the AMR-WB codec, but Qualcomm probably doesn't support that over their cdma chips. Another nice option would be for ios to include support for EVRC-NW.

 

Maybe VoLTE will bring AMR-WB to Sprint, but VoLTE might be a long ways off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even SVLTE is in doubt. AnandTech's Brian Klug and I discussed it on Twitter last night.

 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I crazy or doesn't the Rev B1 HAC RF Test Report document list Voice over digital transport and concurrent single transmission for CDMA+LTE, in table 5.2?

 

The footnote seems to say the rating was not based on concurrent voice/data mode because non-concurrent represented the worst-case rating?

 

edit: I guess this is the hearing-aid test to make sure it doesn't interfere with them and that would make sense that CDMA 1xRTT is the worse-case for interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even SVLTE is in doubt. AnandTech's Brian Klug and I discussed it on Twitter last night.

 

https://twitter.com/...067790690279425

 

AJ

 

Can you imagine the fallout from this now that people expect this feature on LTE devices? I can't think of a single CDMA handset that cannot do SVLTE...that would be crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From having a look at the FCC docs myself, I can't find any mention of SVDO/SVLTE, other than running VoIP and data simultaneously (no VoLTE). Definitely disappointing if the omission means a lack of support.

 

Ian, I will be traveling today, but feel free to get in touch if you have any questions while you work on the iPhone 5 FCC authorization write up. I am more than happy to consult. And thanks for taking on this article.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ/Ian: I seemed to recall that the MDM9615 chip supported both FD and TD for LTE, but it seems that these radios in iPhone 5 will not support CLWR's band class (nor others using 2.5/2.6ghz), so despite the processor being capable for TD-LTE these versions of iPhone are unlikely to support Sprint devices on CLWR when it gets its hot spot TD-LTE network up. Is that a correct conclusion?

 

Of course, since Apple introduced 3 versions already, it doesn't preclude a 4th or 5th flavor to come subsequently, I guess.

 

Am I also reading correctly that this iPhone 5 will in fact support Sprint 1xCDMA 800 for voice coverage when it's rolled out for NV?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ/Ian: I seemed to recall that the MDM9615 chip supported both FD and TD for LTE, but it seems that these radios in iPhone 5 will not support CLWR's band class (nor others using 2.5/2.6ghz), so despite the processor being capable for TD-LTE these versions of iPhone are unlikely to support Sprint devices on CLWR when it gets its hot spot TD-LTE network up. Is that a correct conclusion?

 

Of course, since Apple introduced 3 versions already, it doesn't preclude a 4th or 5th flavor to come subsequently, I guess.

 

Am I also reading correctly that this iPhone 5 will in fact support Sprint 1xCDMA 800 for voice coverage when it's rolled out for NV?

 

Just because the chip supports TD-LTE (along with SVDO/SVLTE) doesn't mean Apple supports it in the device construction or iOS. Sure, they could co-opt the WiFi antenna for 2500MHz TD-LTE and it would probably work just fine, but since Sprint hasn't even begun certifying devices for that band class, it ain't gonna happen this time around.

 

The phone does have CDMA (1xAdvanced or EvDO Rev. A) on SMR though. So it will be able to use that component of Sprint's network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I get impression from this thread that iPhone 5 Version 2 supports LTE on 850(800)/AWS/1900 but it has no CDMA on AWS band at all.

 

Query, how does Cricket sell a prepaid iPhone in those of its markets with AWS where it doesn't have 1900 CDMA? I am scratching

my head, unless I guess it's running iPhones in those markets on Sprint as an MVNO - or simply not selling an yiPhones except where it has 19000 band CDMA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...