Jump to content
sajanisch

Network Vision/LTE - Milwaukee Market (including Madison)

Recommended Posts

They said that tower is operating at 100 percent.  If I walk around the block and get line of sight I get about 20-30 Mbs, but around 2 or 3 in the house.  It could be that Southlawn, and all the trees in the way have something to do with it

does your home, or a home between you and the tower have a steel roof?  that can often cause major interference.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweet baby Jesus, LTE Roaming on USCC in western Wisconsin! (note: still counts against roaming cap of 300 or 100mb )

 

http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp#!/

 

uleEzaa.png

 

Sent from my Sprint Note5

Not understanding that since USCC is giving Sprint roaming included with plans. Hopefully that will change.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not understanding that since USCC is giving Sprint roaming included with plans. Hopefully that will change.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

 

Yeah, there's hardly any LTE+ across the nation, I'm hoping that it'll be growing in a lot of places. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just picked up "Extended Network" LTE Roaming on USCC in my building here in Madison!  Nice to see. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just picked up "Extended Network" LTE Roaming on USCC in my building here in Madison! Nice to see.

Post a screenshot when you get a chance.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Post a screenshot when you get a chance.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

I'll be heading to the basement later so I'll get one then. Popped up in the elevator this am.

 

Sent from my Sprint Note5

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm having a real hard time capturing it. Bounces to USCC LTE and then to Evdo Rev A.  Just dawned on me now that I should just do a screen recording to capture it.  Have to be in the exact right areas otherwise it'll grab on to a 1x800 Sprint signal for dear life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not understanding that since USCC is giving Sprint roaming included with plans. Hopefully that will change.

 

You keep repeating this.  It is not correct.  USCC has a roaming quota that applies to Sprint.  If you have proof otherwise, the burden is on you to post it.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You keep repeating this.  It is not correct.  USCC has a roaming quota that applies to Sprint.  If you have proof otherwise, the burden is on you to post it.

 

AJ

 

I realize I'm mistaken, though this was posted the same time as my post in the other thread.

 

USCC gives 400MB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I realize I'm mistaken, though this was posted the same time as my post in the other thread.

 

USCC gives 400MB.

 

Yes, that is accurate.  USCC does not want its subs living in Sprint markets and perma roaming.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VZW is strong almost everywhere because they have 700 MHz nationally and 20x20 AWS over most of the US, not to mention a boatload of small cells.

 

T-Mobile is hitting the end of the spectrum runway in a lot of moderate sized cities already.

 

Sprint is going to be fun to watch with 20 MHz of multiple B41 channels, nationwide SMR, and small cells by the boatload in 2016.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read variations of the same theme for the past five years. One constant remains. Sprint is a far distant 4th among carriers in this market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read variations of the same theme for the past five years. One constant remains. Sprint is a far distant 4th among carriers in this market.

Please note post 3 comments up.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Sprint is going to be fun to watch with 20 MHz of multiple B41 channels, nationwide SMR, and small cells by the boatload in 2016.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

These small cells and infill towers have to happen sooner than later.

 

Sent from my Sprint Note5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read variations of the same theme for the past five years. One constant remains. Sprint is a far distant 4th among carriers in this market.

Sprint was third in the 1H 2015 RootMetrics in Milwaukee over T-Mobile. Then they jumped AT&T in the 2H test.

 

What data are you looking at?

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Real world. And my own phone experience in Milw. West Allis and Waukesha compared to my work ATT iPhone. It's not even close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Real world. And my own phone experience in Milw. West Allis and Waukesha compared to my work ATT iPhone. It's not even close.

 

Yeah, well, you can think what you want, but you are not qualified to rank the networks objectively.  You are little more than one data point, while RootMetrics is hundreds or thousands of data points.

 

AJ

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Real world. And my own phone experience in Milw. West Allis and Waukesha compared to my work ATT iPhone. It's not even close.

That isn't the same as a whole metro. I am not discounting that there are parts of Milwaukee that AT&T works better. Considering how close the two are on the final score, it's highly likely. The Root people are aiming for market wide measurements.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That isn't the same as a whole metro. I am not discounting that there are parts of Milwaukee that AT&T works better.

 

People tend to be myopic in their subjective assessments.  AT&T works better at my house and my office.  Therefore, AT&T overall must be better.  It is a composition fallacy -- faulty generalization.

 

AJ

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People tend to be myopic in their subjective assessments. AT&T works better at my house and my office. Therefore, AT&T overall must be better. It is a composition fallacy -- faulty generalization.

 

AJ

Exactly. And some people will have a better experience on AT&T than Sprint in the Milwaukee area. But the data proves that more people around Milwaukee will have a better experience on Sprint than AT&T or T-Mobile. And some people will never accept that.

 

And many other falsely compare what Sprint was two years ago in a spot and what AT&T is now. And that's not even an apples to apples comparison.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There should always be an when it comes to these kind of personal reports. No one will ever discount personal experience, but that does not equate the entire market as a whole. 

 

The fact that Sprint even comes close to Verizon and AT&T in some of these markets means that they have invested significant money in upgrading the network and have become a viable choice.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that Sprint even comes close to Verizon and AT&T in some of these markets means that they have invested significant money in upgrading the network and have become a viable choice.

 

I am not surprised that T-Mobile lags well behind in Milwaukee.  It has been a spectrum constrained market.

 

I am a bit surprised that Sprint beats AT&T, as AT&T has had the benefit of both a Cellular 850 MHz network (Cingular) and a PCS 1900 MHz network (AT&TWS) since the Cingular-AT&TWS merger a decade ago.  AT&T may be struggling under the weight of its own market share.

 

And I must admit I am surprised that VZW wins the market.  For "3G," Milwaukee is one of VZW's few PCS 1900 MHz only markets.  It was PrimeCo before the merger 15 years ago.  No AirTouch, no Bell Atlantic Mobile, no GTE.  So, band 13 is paramount -- no other low band spectrum.  Everything else is mid band.

 

Lastly, while RootMetrics is the best objective testing available, another shortcoming is the failure to test USCC in Milwaukee, Omaha, Tulsa, and Knoxville.  Where USCC is a major market operator -- especially where it is a Cellular 850 MHz licensee, such as in Milwaukee -- it should be included in the testing regimen.

 

With the demise of Nextel, Alltel, MetroPCS, Cricket, Cincinnati Bell, et al., most major markets now are down to the big four.  But not all markets.  And RootMetrics should test the remaining alternative operators in those markets.

 

AJ

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Omaha is a great example of that, T-Mobile doesn't even sell service in that market (now I know you're well aware of that, AJ) so a comparison to uscc would be much more informative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Wrong perks program. This is akin to the Sprint Works program, where Sprint and your company have a bit of a deal that gets you a discount on your line. For example, I have a $5 discount for the time being thanks to the Sprint Works deal with my employer. 
    • The *vast* majority of markets had at least 60Mhz deployed, more if you count small cells and magic boxes. There were only a few areas where they were limited to 40Mhz due to spectrum issues.
    • I was in Greenville, NC last week and finally go to experience T-Mobile's network somewhere that wasn't New York for an extended period of time. Just like NYC, T-Mobile's 600MHz spectrum is extremely underdeployed. There are about 15 T-Mobile sites in the entire city and T-Mobile has deployed 600MHz on only 1 of them. Sprint on the other hand has tri-banded nearly every site. Another issue is that Greenville has pretty bad site density on all networks but the issue is exacerbated on T-Mobile by the fact that they lack Band 12 licenses for pretty much all of Eastern NC. The only lowband license they have is 600MHz and they haven't really put it to use at all. The good news is that speeds weren't that bad at all. Speeds were around 20Mbps on average with peaks of about 65Mbps. Deploying 600MHz likely isn't a priority for T-Mobile in Greenville and the towns surrounding it because on their end the network performance looks fine however, deploying 600MHz would fill in a lot of coverage gaps and give a much more reliable signal overall. Until then, Verizon and AT&T will have T-Mobile beat on coverage thanks to them having lowband on every site and U.S. Cellular will have them beat because U.S. Cellular has a bunch of extra sites that no other carrier uses in the region that provide them with much better coverage than any other carrier in the area.
    • Think T-Mobile will bid on this 5G spectrum?: https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/2307275/white-house-and-dod-announce-additional-mid-band-spectrum-available-for-5g-by-t/ “The White House and Department of Defense announced today that 100 megahertz (MHz) of contiguous mid-band spectrum, in the 3450-3550 MHz band, will be available for 5G by the end of the summer.“ More info: https://breakingdefense.com/2020/08/pentagon-gives-up-huge-slice-of-spectrum-for-5g/ “The White House formally made the request in April. Roughly 200 technical experts from all four armed services, the Office of Secretary of Defense, and the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy studied the problem for 15 weeks. The FCC, which has already endorsed the plan, will start auctioning the spectrum off in December 2021, Kratsios said, with commercial use beginning “as soon as mid-2022.”” I’m sure AT&T/Verizon will fight hard for it.
    • My bet is that TMo is having to pay $0 for those deals. They're intro-level promos to drive traffic to those partners, broadcast across TMo's entire customer base. Wouldn't be surprised if the money goes in the opposite direction, easily paying for whoever actually runs the program.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...