Jump to content

Interesting piece re 800mhz in general


BenChase7

Recommended Posts

I dont really know much about spectrum, other then the bits and pieces I gain here; however, I came across this article regarding 800mhz spectrum and, of course, Sprint came to mind. Would the discussions in this article have any positive effect on how Sprint uses their 800mhz spectrum?

 

http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/15/fcc-seeks-to-streamline-800mhz-band/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the elimination of site based coverage determination affects Cellular 850 MHz (sometimes referred to as 800 MHz), but not SMR 800 MHz.

 

To this point, Cellular 850 MHz licensees have had to register the cell sites and their service contours that form the Service Area Boundaries (SAB) of their Cellular Geographic Service Areas (CGSA). More or less, this is a vestige of the AMPS days.

 

For example, here is an FCC ULS map of my home CMA with the VZW Cellular A-side registered sites marked:

 

http://wireless2.fcc...s+%28VAW%29+LLC

 

(The ULS-GIS is notoriously slow to load, so give it a few moments.)

 

Additionally, here is an actual SAB and CGSA map that VZW filed with the FCC prior to a modification of its Los Angeles CMA Cellular B-side license. The image quality is not great. But, again, note the registered sites marked on the map:

 

http://people.ku.edu...52118079408.gif

 

(Oddly enough, when I ran a Google image query on "CGSA," the map image that popped up was one that I had posted to Howard Forums six years ago. How is that for unintended self reference?!)

 

Parts of the Howard Forums thread containing the map above are also a good read about SAB and CGSA determination:

 

http://www.howardfor...76&page=4&pp=15

 

Finally, here is the FCC notice of proposed rulemaking released today:

 

http://transition.fc...FCC-12-20A1.pdf

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...