Jump to content

LTE building penetration


Recommended Posts

After years of slow 3g speeds in my office, I couldn't wait for LTE to lauch in Houston. Went bought new phone and signed my life away agian. and my luck no 4G LTE where I work in Houston. So I waited and WAITED, and this morning I get to work and I HAVE LTE!!!!! for about three steps into my office. and back to 3G. What the Hell!!!! I have full bars and the 4G before did about the same. If I recall didn't Sprint say that the building penetration would be better? I don't mean to Vent but this SUCKS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of it has to do with thresholds. Also, don't forget that the Houston market has a LONG way to go before being fully built out. There are LOTS of sites that are not upgraded yet.

 

As AJ and Robert have explained, the LTE link is much more fragile than the "less complicated" 3G. While EVDO goes strong past -105dB, LTE seems to sputter out around -95dB.

 

The coverage is better, by about 5dB, because of the modern antennas and new remotely mounted radios (which cut down on line loss)... but you are still subject to where your Sprint tower is located and the building you are in.

 

The next step is Sprint putting LTE on old iDEN spectrum (ESMR in the 800MHz band) in 2013. Coverage is, according to Robert, within about 3% of Verizon's "beachfront" 700MHz upper C block band. Coverage will see another large bump (especially indoor with that band) when that is complete.

 

While you might not be happy waiting another year (and another device that will support LTE on the ESMR band), things are what they are.

 

I would first wait until Sprint finishes building out Houston. I am guessing coverage will improve as the build-out continues. When you are in the office, you could be on a totally different tower (that's the case for me in Boston).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The strength indicator does not show LTE signal strength, ever. Even when the icon says 4G. The signal strength shown is always for 1x. So you likely had a very weak LTE signal outside and then you went inside and the signal was too weak to penetrate where you were at. I just got back from LTE Performance testing in Waco and I can tell you that the Sprint LTE penetration characteristics are far better than WiMax.

 

To find out the LTE signal strength, you must go Settings>About Device>Status. Go down to Mobile Network Type and confirm it is LTE. If so, read the signal strength listed above. If it is a number greater than -115dBm on the EVO LTE (or -90dBm on the GS3, GNex, Viper), then you have a pretty weak LTE signal.

 

More and more coverage is constantly being added every week. If you are just now on the edge of service, you likely will be fully covered in the future. Everyone with an EVDO signal strength of -98dBm or better will likely get LTE service at build out.

 

Robert

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like irev210 said, wait for Sprint to complete the build out in Houston. If you can't or don't want to wait, switch carriers. Venting on S4GRU really won't solve your problems.

 

If you feel a need to complain, call Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, note I have changed the title of the thread, because Sprint LTE signal penetration does not suck, you are just being misinformed about what you are seeing from your device.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad you made the remarks. Steve for better or worst, I feel your frustration here in Atlanta. I'm trying my best to remain positive and patience.

 

Well, I'm not. You all can ask questions, or explain your observations. Even negative observations. However, jumping to conclusions that penetration sucks when the information available to make the determination is faulty is not a good way to voice your concerns around S4GRU.

 

Everyone has a bad day, and make assumptions. I even do it sometimes. But congratulating someone for making a mistake and then making negative comments about it is not helpful.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone compared Wimax to LTE building penetration? Would really like to know how much better the signal penetration is since here in Puerto Rico all houses are made of concrete. Wimax signal here would just completely be lost as soon as you go in a house . :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone compared Wimax to LTE building penetration? Would really like to know how much better the signal penetration is since here in Puerto Rico all houses are made of concrete. Wimax signal here would just completely be lost as soon as you go in a house . :/

 

Yes. I spent a few days in Waco this past holiday weekend doing LTE radio performance testing. I am working up articles to explain the difference. LTE on 1900 is significantly better than WiMax on 2600.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The strength indicator does not show LTE signal strength, ever. Even when the icon says 4G. The signal strength shown is always for 1x. So you likely had a very weak LTE signal outside and then you went inside and the signal was too weak to penetrate where you were at. I just got back from LTE Performance testing in Waco and I can tell you that the Sprint LTE penetration characteristics are far better than WiMax.

 

To find out the LTE signal strength, you must go Settings>About Device>Status. Go down to Mobile Network Type and confirm it is LTE. If so, read the signal strength listed above. If it is a number greater than -115dBm on the EVO LTE (or -90dBm on the GS3, GNex, Viper), then you have a pretty weak LTE signal.

 

More and more coverage is constantly being added every week. If you are just now on the edge of service, you likely will be fully covered in the future. Everyone with an EVDO signal strength of -98dBm or better will likely get LTE service at build out.

 

Robert

Ooh! Have you become more optimistic (or pragmatic through testing at Waco), since if I remeber correctly, just a couple of weeks ago, you had said that it would be -90dBm or better to get LTE service. Or is that for a usable signal, and -98dBm is just service?

 

I got this sitting INSIDE the Subway in Statham, GA this evening. Working pretty good for me.

7uqepe7y.jpg

Mav. :cool:

 

Sent with Apple's permission on my Galaxy Nexus.

Now, the real question is, how does it compare to your speeds outside of the subway?

Edited by feteru
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, the real question is, how does it compare to your speeds outside of the subway?

 

Good question, but as it was raining pretty damn hard at the time, I was unable to test 4G in the open air. :(

I will check it out and post up my findings.

 

Mav. :cool:

 

Sent with Apple's permission on my Galaxy Nexus.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good question, but as it was raining pretty damn hard at the time, I was unable to test 4G in the open air. :(

I will check it out and post up my findings.

 

Mav. :cool:

 

Sent with Apple's permission on my Galaxy Nexus.

Thanks! On a side note, does overcast weather affect LTE and other cellular signals? Common sense tells me it would, but I don't know for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ooh! Have you become more optimistic (or pragmatic through testing at Waco), since if I remeber correctly, just a couple of weeks ago, you had said that it would be -90dBm or better to get LTE service. Or is that for a usable signal, and -98dBm is just service?

 

Based on my observations in Waco, you could keep LTE up to -98dBm RSSI (-123dBm RSRP). However, it's usefulness was variable when the signal was worse than -93dBm RSSI (-118dBm RSRP).

 

Robert

 

Thanks! On a side note, does overcast weather affect LTE and other cellular signals? Common sense tells me it would, but I don't know for sure.

 

Overcast mornings in Waco had no noticeable effect on signal. However, extremely heavy rain may have a mild effect, probably only noticeable to users with a fragile link at the edge of service.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert you are right. I have a very weak signal RSRP(dBm) -109, RSRQ(db)-11. Went to Subway @ 45N and Tidwell and had (dBm)-82. and ran a speed test got 34.51 up and 12.50 down

but half a mile away the signal drops. How far is a good signal "suppose" to go?

post-1810-0-57184800-1346867132_thumb.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok to Get the difference in rssi and rsrp you add 25? I thought it was supposed to be 14

 

According to Sprint FIT reports I've seen, they reference a 25dBm difference. So that is what I have been using. And based on my observations in Waco this past weekend, I tend to think it's accurate.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert you are right. I have a very weak signal RSRP(dBm) -109, RSRQ(db)-11.

 

Your RSRP (signal strength) is not "very weak." That is just a moderate signal. You have at least a 10 dB margin before reselection to eHRPD. However, your RSRQ (signal quality) is not great.

 

Went to Subway @ 45N and Tidwell and had (dBm)-82.

 

That RSRP is exceedingly strong; you are almost certainly within a stone's throw of the site.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Based on my observations in Waco, you could keep LTE up to -98dBm RSSI (-123dBm RSRP). However, it's usefulness was variable when the signal was worse than -93dBm RSSI (-118dBm RSRP).

 

Robert

 

 

 

Overcast mornings in Waco had no noticeable effect on signal. However, extremely heavy rain may have a mild effect, probably only noticeable to users with a fragile link at the edge of service.

 

Robert

 

Seeing that number scares me along with the EVO LTE. In my area its normal to have -90 signal or worse. I won't see 4g much. Definitely keeping my insurance until at least one tower is online here and I can go to the Sprint store to complain until they give me a different phone that doesn't have Lte issues.

 

A decent rain in the south doesn't really kill my signals but it seems to make 3g just about unusable. Is it because of noise or just everyone checking the radar loop to see if it is raining at their house?

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I just pulled up my trails and they all have TACs listed. So no nulls, zeroes or -1's. But there is huge swaths of trails missing. It doesn't appear to log or at least keep any NR driving data unless it is NR only. If it's mixed NR/LTE, then the only thing appearing in the trails is LTE. I am also getting this error.  So it is seeing invalid TAC values, but then when I look at logs, it's like it's deleting them.  Robert
    • I wanted to get on with Genesis, but waited too long.  Just moved my line to BM and another to RP this week.  Experience switching to BM was fantastic though.  Hopefully through them I can at some point get a new sim, or go esim to ride on the Dish network when it exists.
    • Do you see the TAC displayed as -1 in the exported file or is it blank/0? I took a look at your upload on Monday at roughly 12:30 and I’m not seeing any non-valid TAC values - not even -1s, 0s or blanks…
    • Hey @mikejeep - I just shot you a diagnostic from my new Galaxy Flip last night. I’m not able to see Verizon n5 in-app when connected to a midband anchor. 
    • I'm having issues during a WiFi call where the caller can here me but I can't hear them. There are a few bug trackers on Google, but the problem appears to date back to at least early 2021. Appears to maybe also be a T-Mobile specific issue. I'd guess it's technical issues like this that caused them to discourage bringing the Pixel 5 onto their network. And why they didn't even sell it through T-Mobile in the first place. Anyone still here with a Pixel 5? Ever see this issue? Anyone with knowledge of the problem or insight? I'm about to just buy a different phone. Probably won't be a Pixel.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...