Jump to content

America's 10 Worst Cities for Mobile Phone Reception


Recommended Posts

An interesting article by TIME, it shows the "10 worst" cities for cell phone reception throughout the country and in all but one city Sprint ranked as the "best" carrier in those areas:

 

http://techland.time.com/2012/08/20/can-you-hear-me-now-the-10-u-s-cities-with-the-worst-cell-phone-reception/#detroit-michigan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting article by TIME, it shows the "10 worst" cities for cell phone reception throughout the country and in all but one city Sprint ranked as the "best" carrier in those areas:

 

http://techland.time...etroit-michigan

 

Even though it paints Sprint in really good light, I don't put much credence in this article.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to be using OpenSignalMaps which runs on input from phone via an Android app. Sounds like Sensorly to me but that site's maps show me as not having 3G on Sprint where I'm sitting and I do. Long story short. This sort of thing is a great idea but no basis for a full blown carrier comparison. I know that Sensory maps are Sprint biased since they were kind of a big deal for WiMax at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in one of the cities on the list and I can tell you that sprints in building coverage isn't that great. When I go into any building in the city of Jacksonville or any of the surrounding towns theirs a 50/50 chance that I will roam when I go in side. Hopefully that problem will be gone when 800 cdma comes online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think this article is fantastic from a brand stand point for Sprint. This type of press helps with that and its good to see something positive in Sprint's favor. Service in Milwaukee is very solid, Sprint I think shares the title with US Cellular, since the article said it only tested 4 major carriers, this would be accurate for the area. Hope we see more and more good press like this as network vision starts to sweep the country.

Edited by Rasta Cheesehead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in one of the cities on the list and I can tell you that sprints in building coverage isn't that great. When I go into any building in the city of Jacksonville or any of the surrounding towns theirs a 50/50 chance that I will roam when I go in side. Hopefully that problem will be gone when 800 cdma comes online.

are you using wimax or 3g? i only have 3g on sprint, and i don't go downtown very often, but verizon and at&t seem better from the expereince of friends. sprint isn't bad in the area though. i know that metropcs is AWFUL in the area though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though it paints Sprint in really good light, I don't put much credence in this article.

 

Robert

 

Maybe Sprint Android users are the main ones using this app? It mentions that the Open Signal Maps app is the one used to collect the data..so it begs the question - who are those who most use this app? Perhaps some of the answer lies there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in one of the cities on the list and I can tell you that sprints in building coverage isn't that great. When I go into any building in the city of Jacksonville or any of the surrounding towns theirs a 50/50 chance that I will roam when I go in side. Hopefully that problem will be gone when 800 cdma comes online.

 

A second note - I am from Lexington, Kentucky and visit still at least once or twice per year and was last there in March of this year. I can tell you that Sprint 3G there is basically non-existent. Downtown, near the University of Kentucky, near the Keeneland race track, near Blue Grass Airport...and in the outlying areas. It's all abysmal. Horrid, even. 3 years ago the 3G speeds were great. Not anymore. So, yeah, it's true that Sprint service is horrible there. But Verizon, on the other hand, has had 4G LTE for over 6 months and was very recently greatly expanded as part of Verizon's lastet 4G LTE expansion. So Verizon service is awesome there. ATT has 4G HSPA+ there is well. It's just Sprint's network that is so faulty in Lexington.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this article focused on coverage, not quality of data performance.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this article focused on coverage, not quality of data performance.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

That's the way I read it, FWIW. I actually have seldom experienced problems with Sprint on its voice coverage or even dropped calls, although I have nothing kind to say about the current state of legacy 3G data.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The assumption or immediate unquestioned correlation between "quality" and data performance is a great reminder of the average wireless users evolved expectation set. I feel so old fashioned, but I still fret over ending up somewhere with gsm that i desperately need help and have no coverage.

 

Then I wonder.... if they would fix that damn bandwith hungry facebook app to be more efficient, how many of these data complaints would go away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*shrugs* FB has used ~66MB over the past half-month over the cellular network on my phone. It represents maybe 12% of my total cellular usage.

 

On the other hand, I'll add my voice to the choir about Sprint having excellent voice service practically everywhere...but data is a whole other ball game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I live in Detroit Metropolitan area and the coverage has always been bad (if you include all phone companies). I have had Sprint for 11 years and I hear all my friends complaining about no signal (in particular, inside buildings). However, I almost always have signal. Almost never drop, etc. So I would say Sprint is definitely better in Detroit (from a phone point of view).

 

However, Detroit has been short-shifted for any kind of fast data connection. They never really rolled out WiMax (a few unannounced towars) and their roll out of 4G LTE is later than most other big cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the OpenSignal Maps methodology is flawed. Verizon and Sprint can fall back on each other, where AT&T and T-Mobile usually can't. I like RootMetrics' testing better, where they send people to test speed and calls in every market.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

i think this article is fantastic from a brand stand point for Sprint. This type of press helps with that and its good to see something positive in Sprint's favor. Service in Milwaukee is very solid, Sprint I think shares the title with US Cellular, since the article said it only tested 4 major carriers, this would be accurate for the area. Hope we see more and more good press like this as network vision starts to sweep the country.

We aren't close to US Cellular in any aspect in Milwaukee, voice or data, and US Cellular wasn't rated. The "usual" 4 were rated. Your silver lining is made out of aluminum foil.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the fact that Oklahoma City is listed as Sprint being the best in terms of coverage immediately invalidates this in my mind. I'm really rooting for Sprint, but they are the absolute worst of the major carriers in OKC in terms of just about everything - coverage, dropped call percentage, data speeds...everything. This is from my own personal experience as well as RootMetrics' findings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • The powerline tower overlooking downtown Redmond has FINALLY been upgraded. I guess it took this long due to the large birds nest on top of the tower. During the upgrade, they moved all LTE frequencies including B41 to one eNB 84782 and decommissioned eNBs 97521 and 95988. Additionally, the tower finally has all three 5G-SA bands (gNB 1852420). 
    • I have 3 Samsung Galaxy a10e for mapping LTE. For 5G I like the Samsung a32 5g (both factory unlocked).  In both cases try to get one with firmware from the spring of this year.  Then you can use the Samsung Band Selection app no matter what the carrier. Been trying to get my OnePlus Nord n200 5Gs squared away with android 11 and rooted.  OnePlus bought out by Oppo thus service and strategic direction are both problems.  Just getting an e-mail back for the unlock the bootloader process is taking a while. Once we get out of NSA, 5g will be much easier to map. Factory unlocked esim issues are plentiful on high end Samsungs.  My quest is a factory unlocked phone that works well with SCP and Cellmapper for both SA and NSA, with multiple active esims that work easily with MVNOs, functioning VoNR, great reception and transmission, full band support for AT&T and Dish. My next hopeful candidate is the s23.
    • Forgot to mention that I traveled all over the lower Hudson Valley last weekend while using the Verizon eSIM trial to directly both carriers' coverage on one device as opposed to using a second phone. Coverage was virtually the same in my experience with the biggest exception being the Bear Mountain region. All along the Long Mountain Parkway from Woodbury Common going east, coverage remained virtually the same. Both carriers reported similar signal strength going all the way down to 1 bar at the same times but when I arrived at the roundabout near where Long Mountain and Palisades Parkway meet up with one another, Verizon had a much stronger signal compared to T-Mobile's 1 bar. Verizon has a series of sites installed all over Bear Mountain State Park to provide signal to visitors. Unfortunately it doesn't seem like any other carrier attempted to do the same in the 2+ years since they got built. Because of these sites when you're driving on Bear Mountain Bridge and along Bear Mountain Bridge Road going south, Verizon has slightly stronger signal than T-Mobile. — — — — — I'm thinking about buying a burner Android phone to get back into mapping again because I drive around the city a lot and never get the chance to do so. I have a Galaxy S7 Edge in a drawer with an inactive T-Mobile SIM but it doesn't register LTE at all and it doesn't have Band 71 so it's not that useful for me. Any recommendations for phones/plans to map cheaply?
    • So what am I missing???   Why cant i get the s22 ultra do a screen share through cord??  Trying to get it to share to my 10" auto screen. I could enable it with the note 20.. but I cant seem to get this to do it.. All the videos show 1 way, but that setting isnt there.
    • Got the update last night. Broke SCP notifications .... so yay.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...