Jump to content

This is what Network Vision looks like on a college campus.


Recommended Posts

While doing these tests I had connection drops about 1/3 of the time. When it came through there speeds ranged from .02Mbps to .5Mbps. From this I'm assuming it's a capacity issue. Also, ping times were rarely under 600ms. Signal strength is about -96dBm.

 

This seems bad but last year, pre NV, if I got a connection through, the speeds rarely passed .1Mbps and if they did I was ecstatic. It's not just Sprint however. All cell connections are a bit crippled here with ATT being by far the strongest and Verizon the most consistant, no surprises there. Sprint hangs in the middle with spotty WiMax and relatively weak 3G.

 

This is what I'm seeing if the connection goes through which has as it approaches noon is getting closer to the 50% success. Stupid freshman and their iPhones need to learn how to connect to WiFi, they never leave the dorms anyways.

5A6Oml.pngRjmIbl.png9X0Bml.png

For those that may say, that's no NV! Here's a screen of network.sprint.com. As you can see there is more work to be done but a bunch has been done so far.

5VCGfl.png

edit: I'd like to note, yes, I use WiFi but the signal does not reach to all my bus stops and there is no WiFi on the buses I use (There is on the school's shuttles.) With an error window of about 10-15 minutes on the bus schedule, I find myself trying to do something on 3G while waiting.

 

Hope you enjoyed my tale.

Edited by Contreramanjaro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While doing these tests I had connection drops about 1/3 of the time. When it came through there speeds ranged from .02Mbps to .5Mbps. From this I'm assuming it's a capacity issue. Also, ping times were rarely under 600ms. Signal strength is about -96dBm.

 

This seems bad but last year, pre NV, if I got a connection through, the speeds rarely passed .1Mbps and if they did I was ecstatic. It's not just Sprint however. All cell connections are a bit crippled here with ATT being by far the strongest and Verizon the most consistant, no surprises there. Sprint hangs in the middle with spotty WiMax and relatively weak 3G.

 

This is what I'm seeing if the connection goes through which has as it approaches noon is getting closer to the 50% success. Stupid freshman and their iPhones need to learn how to connect to WiFi, they never leave the dorms anyways.

5A6Oml.pngRjmIbl.png9X0Bml.png

For those that may say, that's no NV! Here's a screen of network.sprint.com. As you can see there is more work to be done but a bunch has been done so far.

5VCGfl.png

edit: I'd like to note, yes, I use WiFi but the signal does not reach to all my bus stops and there is no WiFi on the buses I use (There is on the school's shuttles.) With an error window of about 10-15 minutes on the bus schedule, I find myself trying to do something on 3G while waiting.

 

Hope you enjoyed my tale.

 

I'm sorry to say that network.sprint.com only shows band-aid fixes, not NV. NV sites are starting in your area soon, but nothing is online yet. It will help greatly when they are.

 

Rickie

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even so, these fixes have made a previously unusable network usable. I'm just happy to see Sprint addressing it at all.

That is the goal until NV arrives. They've been doing these band-aid fixes in pretty much all congested areas. Performance was pretty much exactly the same as you posted above at Purdue University in West Lafayette, IN, but ever since a few months ago, I can pull over 1 Meg down on 3G pretty much any time of the day (from Friday - Sunday when i'm down there).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fellow Hoosier here, but at IU - Bloomington. Speeds are pretty fantastic here and have been since I arrived mid-2011. Worst tests are approx. .5 Mbps. Tops out around 1.5. I should also share that the .5 Mbps happens with super weak signal. NV will be great, but these speeds that I'm seeing are fairly respectable. Enough for my needs, really. The ping times just need to get lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fellow Hoosier here, but at IU - Bloomington. Speeds are pretty fantastic here and have been since I arrived mid-2011. Worst tests are approx. .5 Mbps. Tops out around 1.5. I should also share that the .5 Mbps happens with super weak signal. NV will be great, but these speeds that I'm seeing are fairly respectable. Enough for my needs, really. The ping times just need to get lower.

 

I went to IU from 2009-2011. When I first started there, there wasn't even 3G, it just stopped somewhere just south of Martinsville and basically didn't exist until Kentucky again. The explanation I received was that is came from Evansville instead of Indianapolis like it does now. So my freshman year sucked on 2G but the WiFi there is nearly flawless so it wasn't too bad. So the 3G was 1 year old when you got there. I was down in Btown just before school started this year and consistently pulled 1.5 to 2Mbps on campus, up to 10 on WiMax (That town has to be damn near officially covered.) Add in 50k plus additional bodies for those that go home in the summer and I'd say .5 is pretty damn good.

 

Oh, at the time I had no WiFi on my phone, Samsung Instinct... All those cool unlimited everything features I'd been thrilled about just 8 or so months earlier were worthless. It's such a first world problem when I hop on my laptop and pull 90+Mbps though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to IU from 2009-2011. When I first started there, there wasn't even 3G, it just stopped somewhere just south of Martinsville and basically didn't exist until Kentucky again. The explanation I received was that is came from Evansville instead of Indianapolis like it does now. So my freshman year sucked on 2G but the WiFi there is nearly flawless so it wasn't too bad. So the 3G was 1 year old when you got there. I was down in Btown just before school started this year and consistently pulled 1.5 to 2Mbps on campus, up to 10 on WiMax (That town has to be damn near officially covered.) Add in 50k plus additional bodies for those that go home in the summer and I'd say .5 is pretty damn good.

 

Oh, at the time I had no WiFi on my phone, Samsung Instinct... All those cool unlimited everything features I'd been thrilled about just 8 or so months earlier were worthless. It's such a first world problem when I hop on my laptop and pull 90+Mbps though.

 

I was shocked to discover that Btown had WiMax when I arrived on campus. Kind of a moot point now with an Evo LTE. Also, I was very very pleasantly surprised with the speeds here. I used to attend Purdue and the speeds at W-Laf when I was there were absolutely horrendous - as in couldn't stream pandora when walking to class bad. Speedtests consistently under 100 kbps and the like.

 

On a semi-related note, I'd like Robert to possibly explain something to me: On your coverage map from Western Kentucky, it showed a few sites in the southern Indiana region (read: bloomington), yet the Indy market shows those same sites. To quoth Jerry Seinfeld: What's the deal?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a semi-related note, I'd like Robert to possibly explain something to me: On your coverage map from Western Kentucky, it showed a few sites in the southern Indiana region (read: bloomington), yet the Indy market shows those same sites. To quoth Jerry Seinfeld: What's the deal?!

 

In the map where you think you see Bloomington in the West Kentucky market, it's just an illusion. Bloomington is in the Indianapolis market. However, nearby Bedford is in the West Kentucky market. Those sites in the West Kentucky map in the article are actually around Bedford, but at a glance appears like it might be Bloomington.

 

Those markers have a round top with a point on the bottom. It's where the point is that matters, not the round top.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How on earth do you always answer questions quickly?! Thanks for the clarification too, by the way.

 

He's really a robot.. Kinda like Eliza from the Commodore 64 days but better at the tech... Not so much on the emotions though.

 

I sense people googling this :)

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully the Indy market will have it by year end. If Samsung ever gets started on a second market and get out of Chicago. I know here in Indy we need it bad 3g gets so bogged down from all the prepaid customers around here.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Okay.  I just pulled the Location permission with the app running, and I think it may have closed and immediately reopened.  But I got a notification telling me that "Permission required" while the app itself just said "Waiting for update.." with a spinning circle.  Once I tapped on the "Permission required" notification, it popped up asking for location permission which I then granted. - Trip
    • Thanks! There have been some recent changes to Android permissions requirements that were not documented very well and caused a tremendous amount of problems, especially for users who recently updated to Android 14. Thankfully I have some decent monitoring and diagnostics in place so I was eventually able to figure out what was going on. I'm basically looking for testers to mess around with revoking/denying/granting permissions to make sure the app doesn't crash and the workflow/warnings are reasonably clear. I do know that if you revoke/grant permissions while the app is in use, the app sometimes requires a restart (or at least as swipe out and back in) to get the proper prompting, but it's difficult to control 100% of the scenarios with the amount of background work SCP does with methods that require special permission.
    • So I revoked the permissions before doing the update on my S21FE (Android 12) and when I reopened, it asked me for the permissions, which I granted.  No crashes, all went smoothly.  Is that what you wanted?  If so, I can repeat on a few of my other post-10 devices.  If not, let me know what to do differently. - Trip
    • A new SignalCheck beta release is rolling out now.. this includes several bugfixes, notably issues on Android 10+ devices when Location permission was not granted, and on Android 14 devices when "Allow all the time" Location permission was not granted but the app was configured to launch at device boot. Please test this version by temporarily revoking permissions for SCP and ensure the app does not crash -- it will not work very well due to Android security requirements, but that's the point..
    • Article from October 2022: https://www.reviewjournal.com/business/stadium/allegiant-stadiums-wireless-connectivity-to-get-boost-before-super-bowl-2652035/
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...