Jump to content

Pre-Launch Speeds for 4G LTE, Wimax and 3G according to Sprint


Recommended Posts

I received a communication from Sprint today linking me to a webpage about NV launch.

 

Below is one of their webpages indicating speeds for 4G LTE, Wimax and 3G after Network Vision is implemented.

 

Sprint states - "Expected speeds based on testing of deployed sites prior to network launch."

 

http://www.sprint.co...20808:LNL:B2C:T

 

Waiting patiently for SoCal. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got these speeds the other day.

 

1. AT 151st and Metcalfe, southern Overland Park

 

NhtOV.png

 

2. At blue ridge and 71 hwy in grandview.

 

 

wBNuK.png?1

 

 

NIce!!!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received a communication from Sprint today linking me to a webpage about NV launch.

 

Below is one of their webpages indicating speeds for 4G LTE, Wimax and 3G after Network Vision is implemented.

 

Sprint states - "Expected speeds based on testing of deployed sites prior to network launch."

 

http://www.sprint.co...20808:LNL:B2C:T

 

Waiting patiently for SoCal. B)

 

It doesn't seem to be that old. It must have been published after LTE went live in Atlanta and the other cities in July 15th. Still useful info. Thanks for the post!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't seem to be that old. It must have been published after LTE went live in Atlanta and the other cities in July 15th. Still useful info. Thanks for the post!

 

This is the internet, anything more than 24 to maybe 48 hours max is considered old information. LOL, :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the internet, anything more than 24 to maybe 48 hours max is considered old information. LOL, :P

Yes and that's sad. It only speaks to our collective A.D.D. we all seem to suffer from in Westernized, developed nations. LOL. But I also think it unnecessary to from a negative post simply to put down someone else's and that was really my point. Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...