Jump to content

700 Mhz LTE on Verizon


Recommended Posts

I picked up a Galaxy S III on Verizon since it'll be awhile before LTE comes to Minnesota. Verizon doesn't work in tin-can buildings either -- the same places where Sprint doesn't work. I guess the lesson learned is don't expect "magic" from the 700 Mhz / 800 Mhz band!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Metal buildings are de facto Faraday cages. The frequency hardly matters -- the metal will absorb or reflect the signal.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually been a little disappointed in my LTE 700 coverage with my VZW hotspot. I was expecting equal coverage with VZW 850, and it's definitely not the case. VZW 850 extends into buildings significantly better and beyond LTE 700 edge of service. LTE 700 signals can be really fragile at edge of service conditions, similar to WiMax. Touch the device and you get dropped.

 

All in all, LTE at 700 is way better than anything at 1900 or 2500. However, it is not the panacea many may be expecting based on my three weeks of observations so far.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert, what is the make and model of the VZW LTE hotspot? I will pull its authorization filing from the FCC OET to check out ERP, antenna gain, etc.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert' date=' what is the make and model of the VZW LTE hotspot? I will pull its authorization filing from the FCC OET to check out ERP, antenna gain, etc.

 

AJ[/quote']

 

It's the ZTE Jetpack 890L.

 

I'm embarrassed to admit this, but instead of checking the OET, I read the customer reviews. Several of the hotspots, people complained about the LTE signal compared to their smart phones...claiming they were weak. In the 890L, people seemed to be pleased with the signal, compared to other hotspots and smartphones.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I'm on VZW 850 3G with the hotspot, the RSSI tracks very similarly with my GS-III on a VZW PRL. The hotspot will be slightly better in most instances if I am holding the GS-III in my hand. If I put them both down, they track about the same.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the ZTE Jetpack 890L.

 

The Q78-EUFI890 aka ZTE 890L uses a good modem -- the Qualcomm MDM9600 multimode chipset. But max ERP for LTE 750 is just okay at 17.13 dBm. By comparison, max ERP for EV-DO 850 and EV-DO 1900 are 21.51 dBm and 25.53 dBm, respectively.

 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=301190&fcc_id='Q78-EUFI890'

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Q78-EUFI890 aka ZTE 890L uses a good modem -- the Qualcomm MDM9600 multimode chipset. But max ERP for LTE 750 is just okay at 17.13 dBm. By comparison, max ERP for EV-DO 850 and EV-DO 1900 are 21.51 dBm and 25.53 dBm, respectively.

 

https://apps.fcc.gov..._id=Q78-EUFI890'

 

AJ

 

That explains a lot. Thanks for the info.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Q78-EUFI890 aka ZTE 890L uses a good modem -- the Qualcomm MDM9600 multimode chipset. But max ERP for LTE 750 is just okay at 17.13 dBm. By comparison, max ERP for EV-DO 850 and EV-DO 1900 are 21.51 dBm and 25.53 dBm, respectively. https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=301190&fcc_id='Q78-EUFI890' AJ

 

How does this compare to the sprint LTE Phones? AKA, if we can compare apples to oranges, does sprint's new LTE have a good max ERP in general? Or should I say, if there is a difference, which phone is the best?

Edited by Josh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Metal buildings are de facto Faraday cages. The frequency hardly matters -- the metal will absorb or reflect the signal.

 

AJ

 

I live in a high rise condo building (7 floors). It's cement block outside with metal framing inside. Verizon has the best signal even though it's on 1900MHz and AT&T is on 850 and they're on the same tower. Sprint is great by the front door but starts fading quickly once you get inside. T-Mobile although on the same tower as Verizon and AT&T is weaker than any of them and Sprint.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does this compare to the sprint LTE Phones? AKA, if we can compare apples to oranges, does sprint's new LTE have a good max ERP in general? Or should I say, if there is a difference, which phone is the best?

 

The regulations on the 800 ESMR require a lower max ERP than the regulations on Cellular 850, but it isn't too terrible much different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in a stucco house (so it has stucco over that metal chicken wire), over concrete block. On Verizon 4G LTE I get 355ms, 0.56Mbps down, 0.38Mbps up.

 

On Sprint 4G I'd get 5 to 10Mbps only when putting the phone in the windows, and about 0.5 to 1 Mbps elsewhere in the house. Sprint 3G in the house I get 40 kbps to 200 kbps down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in a stucco house (so it has stucco over that metal chicken wire), over concrete block. On Verizon 4G LTE I get 355ms, 0.56Mbps down, 0.38Mbps up.

 

On Sprint 4G I'd get 5 to 10Mbps only when putting the phone in the windows, and about 0.5 to 1 Mbps elsewhere in the house. Sprint 3G in the house I get 40 kbps to 200 kbps down.

 

I live in the land of stucco. I didn't know they used the stuff in Minnesota. I think the absolute worst structure to be in is an adobe with a refurbished stucco finish. If the RF can get through the chicken wire, it can't get through the mud bricks. Add some LO-E coated windows to the mix and you almost have a perfect RF shield. Many high end homes in Santa Fe cannot get a good signal, even being one block from a tower.

 

My first home when I moved to New Mexico was a partial adobe. In the wood structure part of the house, I could get Sprint EVDO at approximately -87dBm. Moved to the adobe portion (which was the side closest to the tower), and I would get either nothing or -106dBm.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do, don't you???

 

My house is stick framed with aluminum siding... BTW, aluminum siding is not terribly good at allowing signals through. I figure it is about 10 dbm signal loss caused by the walls. Still no stucco or adobe though...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and AJ think we all live in log houses don't you? LOL

 

I believe we have a picture of Scott's house. Yes, here it is...

 

PaulBunyan.jpg

 

And this, of course, is Scott's lovely wife...

 

15gcx34.jpg

 

:P

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I believe we have a picture of Scott's house. Yes' date=' here it is...

 

And this, of course, is Scott's lovely wife...

 

:P

 

AJ[/quote']

 

Well, you could have told me you were coming by. I would have made sure I was home.

 

Sent from JBToro on Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does this compare to the sprint LTE Phones? AKA, if we can compare apples to oranges, does sprint's new LTE have a good max ERP in general? Or should I say, if there is a difference, which phone is the best?

 

Ask and ye shall receive. I put together an ERP comparison table:

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArY31Mr219-ydFA2TnFsRFFJMmlodUFodGoycE1hRXc

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Ask and ye shall receive. I put together an ERP comparison table:

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArY31Mr219-ydFA2TnFsRFFJMmlodUFodGoycE1hRXc

 

AJ

 

The Viper has some real strong ERP's, but it was not translating into solid performance in my testing. Man, check out the TriFi Hotspot. You could cook Thanksgiving with that thing. That's some power. I wish my Verizon hotspot was more akin to that.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The regulations on the 800 ESMR require a lower max ERP than the regulations on Cellular 850, but it isn't too terrible much different.

 

Part 22 regulations (Cellular 850 MHz): mobile station max ERP < 7 W

Part 24 regulations (PCS 1900 MHz): mobile station max EIRP < 2 W

Part 90 regulations (SMR 800 MHz): mobile station max ERP < 100 W

Part 27 regulations (Upper 700 MHz): mobile station max ERP < 3 W

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All other factors equal, use these baselines:

 

Subtract 7 dB from PCS 1900 MHz EIRP to compare it to Cellular 850 MHz ERP.

Subtract 8 dB from PCS 1900 MHz EIRP to compare it to Upper 700 MHz ERP.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just revisiting the RCS issue and discussing another point I find odd.  Yeah, my family and close friends and most coworkers still mostly use whats app in our chats due to the odd RCS issues.   Some have Apple phones, some Samsung.  But using Facebook Messenger or Whats App handily eliminates those issues.   But the other thing I find odd is how all the information out there states that to use the Smart View app to mirror your phone to your TV that your TV and your phone have to be on the same wifi network.  That is 100 percent untrue.  I've historically not had wifi at home and only use it in our common areas in our community or occasionally at work.  But primarily I just use my phone for everything and do not have wifi at home.  It's because I haven't needed it.  I've been using all my Samsung phones for the better part of a decade now as my entertainment center because it's simple, effective, portable and absolutely does not require a wifi connection for my TV in order to cast all the content from my phone.  I'm not sure why it is stated that it is required.  The two devices - as we all no doubt know - create a wifi direct connection between the two devices in order for smart view to work, however, no general wifi network is required at all.  Again, I've been enjoying the feature for close to a decade but I find it odd that they say that you need wifi at home to use it.  Samsung television sets, Roku TV sets, LG TV sets (I cast to all of them at work regularly, again, sans wifi) and TCL TVs are all compatible.  There are likely more but these are the ones that I regularly screen mirror to, again, without the two devices being on the same network (this is separate from the notion of creating a wifi direct connection between the 2 in order to enable the service). This is the sole reason I only buy Samsung phones.   I tried a Pixel device before the Pixel 8 (which was the first to allow display out via wired connection for streaming) but it simply did not offer the same feature.   I wonder why they say this.  It's interesting if nothing else.  
    • Yeah, I probably see it through a Washington/Oregon market lens. And maybe a little Nebraska too.  These are the only places I have monitored Tmo overlay of USC closely. Tmo has already added service on 80% of the same towers that were unique to USC just 5 years ago around here.  The 20% left are either too close to an existing Tmo site, or, probably already on Tmo's plans to collocation.  But there is one USC site on the beach where our family likes to go that I am dying for Tmo to add service.  There won't be a lot of new coverage added here. But I have not done really any review in other USC areas.  But I definitely think it's a good move. Robert
    • Found Ericsson C-band+DoD in Brooklyn. What tipped me off was when I mapped a new eNB in this area on Halloween but I didn't see any permits for a new site in the area and the sectors I mapped matched the existing site that was there. Drove by it today and sure enough it's an Ericsson C-band + DoD site, likely one of the first in the city.  This is eNB 110340, formerly eNB 115257. — — — — — Also a T-Mobile new build in Queens. The permit for this one was submitted last year as a replacement for another monopole that got demolished nearby. It must've only recently got installed because it was offline when I drove by it.
    • Here’s What to Do If You’re Still Paying a Monthly Sprint Flex Lease Charge  Not sure this applies to anyone here but if it does ...
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...