Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
at1988

Global Roaming for Galaxy S3 Sprint Model

Recommended Posts

So as people know, Verizon, also a CDMA carrier, is going to issue an OTA update which will let Galaxy S3 owners take their phones around the world, including to GSM countries. I called up Sprint and asked them: if Sprint wanted to, could they do the same, and the guy told me that if they wanted to, they could. Now LTE is a GSM based technology, which means that any LTE phone has GSM capabilities either enabled or disabled in part. I switched from a Photon, which I still own, in part knowing that this could happen. But the Photon doesn't have LTE or SVDO. The GS3 does have a SIM card, but the plastic cover in the battery case covers, or embeds it.

 

I found a petition online seeking to encourage Sprint to do the same. Shouldn't this be a part of the Network Vision, to give customers as many reasons to stay with Sprint as possible?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correction: LTE isn't GSM. It is a 3GPP standard, sure, along with HSPA. But saying that it's like GSM is like saying WiFi is like WiMAX because they are both IEEE 802.x standards.

 

I too hope that the S3 gets its HSPA radio unlocked. However I'm not even sure the phone on Sprint has that radio inside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correction: LTE isn't GSM. It is a 3GPP standard, sure, along with HSPA. But saying that it's like GSM is like saying WiFi is like WiMAX because they are both IEEE 802.x standards.

 

I too hope that the S3 gets its HSPA radio unlocked. However I'm not even sure the phone on Sprint has that radio inside.

 

Its the same physical device across carriers, minus the firmware and the covered SIM card in the Sprint one, per a Sprint representative. And we know people hacked the Verizon Galaxy Nexus to accept GSM. A radio is simply firmware, like if one wants to make a Photon work on ATT/Tmobile, they flash a radio and unlocking the bootloader, etc.

 

LTE IS GSM based: "Long Term Evolution (LTE), is the latest standard in the mobile network technology tree that produced the GSM/EDGE and UMTS/HSxPA network technologies."

 

Hence why Sprint and Verizon LTE phones have SIM cards: Sprint just tries to literally cover them up.

 

It would make perfect sense for Sprint to allow global roaming, especially if the SIM card is sealed under plastic: we could go overseas, they'd collect on roaming. This

Edited by at1988

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not the same device across carriers. Sprint Verizon and AT&T all have different LTE setups in each phone.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not the same device across carriers. Sprint Verizon and AT&T all have different LTE setups in each phone.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

 

But aren't the actual chipsets and capabilities the same? I was under the impression that the problems are more related to antennas than to the actual capabilities of the unit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But aren't the actual chipsets and capabilities the same? I was under the impression that the problems are more related to antennas than to the actual capabilities of the unit.

 

They should be the same basic SOC with the same capabilities, but as you said, if the antennas PA's etc aren't there, they can't open up global roaming.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its the same physical device across carriers, minus the firmware and the covered SIM card in the Sprint one, per a Sprint representative. And we know people hacked the Verizon Galaxy Nexus to accept GSM. A radio is simply firmware, like if one wants to make a Photon work on ATT/Tmobile, they flash a radio and unlocking the bootloader, etc.

 

No, just no. Too many superficially knowledgable techies seem to think that any problem is fixable in software, that any technology can be reduced to the size of a microchip.

 

Yes, all domestic Galaxy S3 models are based on the same Qualcomm MSM8960 chipset, which contains a multimode 3GPP/3GPP2 LTE capable modem. But far more than just modem, airlink and band/band class capability require compatible power amps, filters, and antennas -- physical things that cannot be replicated in software and are a bit larger than microchips.

 

As Scott points out above, Samsung has submitted to the FCC four different Galaxy S3 LTE versions for VZW, AT&T, Sprint, and USCC. Maybe all of those versions contain the same power amps, filters, and antennas to support LTE bands 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, and 25. But that is quite unlikely, and the onus is on you to prove your claim that they contain all the same hardware.

 

LTE IS GSM based: "Long Term Evolution (LTE), is the latest standard in the mobile network technology tree that produced the GSM/EDGE and UMTS/HSxPA network technologies."

 

No, wrong again. LTE is an OFDMA airlink with an all IP core. GSM and W-CDMA are neither. That 3GPP developed LTE as an evolutionary path for GSM/W-CDMA and other carriers does not make it GSM, nor GSM based. Anything otherwise is GSM cartel propaganda.

 

AJ

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, just no. Too many superficially knowledgable techies seem to think that any problem is fixable in software, that any technology can be reduced to the size of a microchip.

 

Yes, all domestic Galaxy S3 models are based on the same Qualcomm MSM8960 chipset, which contains a multimode 3GPP/3GPP2 LTE capable modem. But far more than just modem, airlink and band/band class capability require compatible power amps, filters, and antennas -- physical things that cannot be replicated in software and are a bit larger than microchips.

 

As Scott points out above, Samsung has submitted to the FCC four different Galaxy S3 LTE versions for VZW, AT&T, Sprint, and USCC. Maybe all of those versions contain the same power amps, filters, and antennas to support LTE bands 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 17, and 25. But that is quite unlikely, and the onus is on you to prove your claim that they contain all the same hardware.

 

 

 

No, wrong again. LTE is an OFDMA airlink with an all IP core. GSM and W-CDMA are neither. That 3GPP developed LTE as an evolutionary path for GSM/W-CDMA and other carriers does not make it GSM, nor GSM based. Anything otherwise is GSM cartel propaganda.

 

AJ

I spoke on the phone with a Sprint representative, who told me to my ear that if Sprint wanted to, they could issue an update. Also, it would likely cost Samsung too much to make 6 actually-different variations, when in reality (minus the Sprint embedded SIM) there are only 3: T/S/VZ/USC, International, and T-Mobile USA. Are you gonna tell me that now, the GS3 doesn't have a SIM card just because Sprint covered it up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I spoke on the phone with a Sprint representative' date=' who told me to my ear that if Sprint wanted to, they could issue an update. Also, it would likely cost Samsung too much to make 6 actually-different variations, when in reality (minus the Sprint embedded SIM) there are only 3: T/S/VZ/USC, International, and T-Mobile USA. Are you gonna tell me that now, the GS3 doesn't have a SIM card just because Sprint covered it up?[/quote']

 

Sprint reps have a tendency to just tell you what they think you want to hear to get you off the phone.

 

It wouldn't cost Samsung much to make 6 different versions. They probably make close to 50 variants of the original Galaxy S and there were a ton of Galaxy S2 variants. Just because the case is the same doesn't make the internals the same.

 

Nobody is saying that there isn't a Sim card. We are saying that if it lacks the filters power amplifiers and antennas to be compatible with international frequencies, it doesn't matter if the chip set is capable of GSM transmit/receive, it will not work internationally. Sprint has an extra band for CDMA (800SMR) above what Verizon has. Adding that to Sprint's version of the GS3 may have forced Samsung to pull the internals to support 900/1800/2100 out of the phone.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pyroscott,

 

when the HTC Rezound and the LG Spectrum came out on Verizon, no one knew or thought they had global roaming capabilities. But when it was found out then the cat got out of the bag. S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when the HTC Rezound and the LG Spectrum came out on Verizon, no one knew or thought they had global roaming capabilities. But when it was found out then the cat got out of the bag. S

 

And none of that is relevant. You can point to latent international roaming capabilities in other handsets all you want, but those handsets are not the Sprint variant Galaxy S3. Thus, those handsets and their internals tell us nothing definitive about the Galaxy S3 and its internals. Sure, the Sprint variant Galaxy S3, like the VZW variant, probably does incorporate some international roaming capability -- that seems likely. But FCC authorization does not extend to bands/band classes used internationally, so FCC authorization docs typically make no mention of those capabilities. As such, we have no direct confirmation right now of international roaming capability; your assumption that it does is only that -- an assumption.

 

AJ

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pyroscott' date='

 

when the HTC Rezound and the LG Spectrum came out on Verizon, no one knew or thought they had global roaming capabilities. But when it was found out then the cat got out of the bag. S

 

Why would Sprint want to hide it? The sim card is embedded, making all the roaming go through Sprint. That is more money for them if it is enabled.

Not all LTE handsets are guaranteed to be international roaming capable. Verizon has had a lot of their recent handsets be capable, but the Verizon galaxy nexus is not. It is probably more likely that Verizon is specifically asking for international capabilities to offset any perceived advantage of AT&T where you can use an unlocked international handset on att or virtually anywhere in the world.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Sprint Galaxy S III did have all the internals to make it international roaming capable, I would be surprised. But if it doesn't, I'm happy just all the same. If I go to Canada, I won't even use my phone up there, as I can't stand Sprint's roaming rates, and Virgin Mobile Canada has some great plans, and GSM phones are a dime a dozen this day and age (I still have my Jailbroken & Carrier unlocked iPhone 3GS), so no matter where in the world I go, I'm set.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Sprint Galaxy S III did have all the internals to make it international roaming capable, I would be surprised. But if it doesn't, I'm happy just all the same. If I go to Canada, I won't even use my phone up there, as I can't stand Sprint's roaming rates, and Virgin Mobile Canada has some great plans, and GSM phones are a dime a dozen this day and age (I still have my Jailbroken & Carrier unlocked iPhone 3GS), so no matter where in the world I go, I'm set.

 

I thought you said the 3gs crapped out on you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought you said the 3gs crapped out on you?

 

It did, and then 2 days later it started working again. :rofl:

That's the 2nd time it has done that to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It did' date=' and then 2 days later it started working again. :rofl:

That's the 2nd time it has done that to me.[/quote']

 

Ah. Well good, my 3rd generation iPod classic only works while on the charger. (Yes, the circa 2003 iPod)

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would Sprint want to hide it? The sim card is embedded, making all the roaming go through Sprint. That is more money for them if it is enabled.

Not all LTE handsets are guaranteed to be international roaming capable. Verizon has had a lot of their recent handsets be capable, but the Verizon galaxy nexus is not. It is probably more likely that Verizon is specifically asking for international capabilities to offset any perceived advantage of AT&T where you can use an unlocked international handset on att or virtually anywhere in the world.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

 

They could want to gauge interest of it on the internet and thru customers, because there is a capital cost in producing the update. And because the SIM is embedded, they might want to gauge if users would want the ability to roam on GSM without the option of even putting another SIM in. THey could also be seeing if there'd be an option to make it removable (ie charge money for a new back piece and its installation, one which allows SIM removal). And Sprint would probably have to go thru the FCC to send an OTA, tho no one originally knew the Rezound or Spectrum would get the international treatment when they came out. Of course there's also the issue of, say, Sprint having deals with Motorola and RIM, but seeing as Sprint's on a good path, their stock has skyrocketed, management should be more wise than to listen to Sprint.

 

I still also have my Photon, which I believe is already unlocked outside the US. But I like my GS3 better. MUCH better.

Edited by at1988

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So nobody really knows whether the Sprint Galaxy 3 would work outside the U.S.? lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you believe that the Sprint GS3 is a miraculous World Phone that Sprint is intentionally blocking world phone capabilities? And you believe their motive for blocking is to see if there is demand? That's so crazy.

 

The Moto Photon Q is coming soon and it is supposed to be a world phone. Why would Sprint be OK with unlocking the potential with the Moto phone but needs to make it secret in the GS3?

 

This thread is absurd. It is obvious that there are some aspects of the GS3 that offer some of the necessities to be a world phone, like the chip. But all the features are not there. Like the antennas, filters and amplifiers. Software cannot overcome such physical limitations. This reminds me of the quack threads I used to see where WiMax devices could be updated with software to run Sprint FD-LTE, but Sprint is choosing to hide that.

 

Even if it were true, Sprint reps would not have that kind of information on their screens. There is no, 'secret device information that we don't want the general public to know section' in Sprint CSR's screen selections. This info is not available to CSR's...period. Get a hold of yourself, man!

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So nobody really knows whether the Sprint Galaxy 3 would work outside the U.S.? lol

 

As of right now we know it will roam internationally in countries that have CDMA service. And until someone can prove that it has all the necessary hardware and antennas, and related miscellaneous, no we don't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no' date=' 'secret device information that we don't want the general public to know section' in Sprint CSR's screen selections.

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner[/quote']

 

I'm going to put on my foil hat. It's all a conspiracy!

 

ManWearingTinFoilHat.jpg

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

was it a conspiracy with Verizon with the Spectrum and Rezound? It was months after they came out that Verizon clarified that they had GSM roaming capabilities.

Edited by at1988

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

was it a conspiracy with Verizon with the Spectrum and Rezound? It was months after they came out that Verizon clarified that they had GSM roaming capabilities.

 

Are you listening? Stop the comparisons with VZW. Sprint is not VZW. Stop the comparisons with the Spectrum and the Rezound. The Galaxy S3 is neither one of those handsets. Your repeated comparisons have no necessary relevance and do not support your argument.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I have to add is:

nuclear facepalm.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By Paynefanbro
      I recently went on an 8 day cruise from NYC to the Caribbean that stopped in Turks and Caicos, Puerto Rico, and the Dominican Republic. My first stop was Grand Turk and there I opted for the free roaming. My S9+ automatically connected to Flow's (Cable & Wireless) LTE network where I received speeds of around 120kbps on average with boosts of up to 150kbps. Something worth noting is that on speed tests, the server prefers to default to Sprint's Miami server as opposed to local servers. Speeds were more than adequate for any amount of web browsing and honestly felt much faster than in reality. It helps that using Chrome will save you data by not loading pictures on certain sites unless you click them.
      In Puerto Rico, I connected to Band 13 on the way into the port in San Juan but once I was in the city, my phone never left Band 41. While the phone was usable, speeds remained significantly lower than what I've come to expect from 3xCA in the mainland U.S. Data speeds peaked at around 25-30Mbos but on average were in the 5-10 Mbps range even on LTE+. Signal remained strong everywhere though. 
      Finally in the Dominican Republic, I entered in Amber Cover which is in Puerto Plata. My phone latched onto a weak Band 2 LTE signal in the port from Altice (called Orange Dominicana in SignalCheck). I had trouble loading pages though. Once off of the ship and out in the open, I had a much stronger signal which allowed me to browse the internet without a hitch. Because it was the last day of my trip, while at the beach I decided to purchase the 24 hour high speed pass for $5. My speeds went from 120kbps to 65Mbps in less than 5 seconds. In some areas speeds were slower, particularly at the port where it struggled to break 2Mbps. Now, back on the boat my phone is flipping between weak Band 4 LTE and overloaded Band 5 HSPA+ from Claro (called Verizon Dominicana in SignalCheck Pro). Here is the difference in speed from before and after purchasing the high speed pass. 
    • By danlodish345
      Hey guys i am curious....i switched to boost mobile and i was curious if there are any handsets that support carrier aggregation.
    • By Febby
      I notice a lot of post regarding the markets in IL,FL,TX,PA,NYC.... but how about about the Los Angeles market? I THINK it was samsung doing the set up for the L.A market? Not sure though.... I'm not a sponsor member of the site so I can't really check... if I had a job I'd most definitely donate!
       
      Couple of months ago the local towers were all down and being upgraded to NV I assume since Larry from Howard forums said there was NV work being done my zip code. The speeds were better for a bit but now they are awful again.
       
      Can anyone (most preferred Robert) make a comment on if there is any LTE activity near 90255 area code?
       
      Thanks, great site by the way... I'm a Lurker.
    • By jakeuten
      Just a bit of insight. I live near UMD in Duluth, MN. Sprint's signal is clearly much 'dirtier' with a 1.0 SNR compared to T-Mobile's 20.4 SNR. I don't have a screenshot from the same time, but I get about a 22 to 29 SNR with T. I know that AT&T uses RRU's but I'm not too sure about Sprint or T-Mobile. Also, I didn't even know they had L2500 where I live, but I force checked it on my Samsung S7 (AT&T). 


    • By S4GRU
      Did you know that with many Sprint (Uniband) LTE Android devices, the signal strength indicator at the top does not show your LTE signal strength? Even if 4G or LTE is displayed next to it?
       
      That's right!  This signal displayed here is your 1x (voice signal), and it is not your 3G EVDO signal strength, nor your LTE signal strength.  Regardless of whether it says 3G or 4G next to it. This is the cause of a lot of confusion.  Also, third party apps like NetMonitor do not show accurate LTE signal strengths. They also only show the 1x signal strength, even though they may reference being connected to LTE.
      The purpose of this thread is to help educate the masses, because many people think they have a strong LTE signal, when in fact they do not. And then they are unhappy, thinking that Sprint LTE is really slow, even with a strong signal. LTE performance is very signal strength dependent. So, when you have a weak signal, you can expect much slower than peak results.
       
      There is only one accurate way to get your LTE signal strength, and that is from your LTE Engineering screen in your Debug menu. And we will discuss the different ways to get that below.
       
      ...In HTC, Motorola & LG Sprint LTE devices:
      Go in to your phone app, and dial ##DEBUG# Select LTE Engineering Go down to RSRP. The number under RSRP shown in dBm is your LTE signal strength. ...In Samsung Sprint LTE devices:
      Go in to your phone app, and dial ##DEBUG# Enter 777468 for your lock code Select LTE Engineering Go down to RSRP. The number next to RSRP shown in dBm is your LTE signal strength. ...In the Galaxy Nexus, Nexus 5:
      Go in to your phone app, and dial *#*#DEBUG#*#* Enter 777468 for your lock code Select LTE Engineering Go down to RSRP. The number next to RSRP shown in dBm is your LTE signal strength. The LTE Signal Strength Scale:
       
      Now you have determined your actual LTE signal strength in dBms your device is receiving, you can use the following scale below to determine its strength:
      Better than -88dBm RSRP is a strong signal Between -89dBm and -96dBm is a very good signal Between -97dBm and -105dBm is good Between -106dBm and -112dBm is fair Worse than -113dBm RSRP is poor Feel free to link people to this thread for explanation. Hopefully, this will clear up some confusion out there!
       
       
  • Posts

    • Long time lurker here, long time SCP user.  FYI...  I'm the guy in the bar that had SC on his phone!  LOL First, I just wanted to thank you for this awesome tool.   Second, I do have an occasional freezing of the app on my Galaxy S20 Ultra.  It's usually when switching back and forth between the engineering screen to check CA, SCP, and the Speedtest app, to make sure it's still running.  I have to go in and force close it to get it to run again. Now for a question: how accurate is the distance from the tower in SCP?  I've had a few times that I can't figure out where it's picking up a tower, and now that I think about it, it could be a SC.  Since the S20 U is now on T-Mobile, there are no site notes for the towers, and I'm trying to figure out where they are!
    • So, I'm late to the party here.  Columbus, Ohio market.  I've had my S20 Ultra since a few days after launch (late pre-order) so I've been through the stuff mentioned through this thread.  My issue is 5G.  Before 5G was turned on, my speeds on T-Mobile were great!  Maybe a bit slower than Sprint in a speedtest, but latency was better, and it "felt" faster.  Then 5G was turned on, and I found out to check in the *#0011# service mode screen to see if n71 was working.  It was, I was happy.  Within a couple days, that totally changed.  It seemed that I rarely got n71, and data was SLOW, maybe 1/3 of the speed as before 5G was turned on.  When I do see n71, speeds are really good. For instance, 2 days ago, it was hitting n71 without active data transferring.  Then yesterday and today, not even a blip of n71 when actively transferring.  I found that switching the network mode to LTE/CDMA got my speeds back to good.  It seems that I must get a profile update push when not looking and it turns 5G back on, or if I have to restart and forget to reset it.   Is anyone else seeing this behavior?  
    • Just got off the phone with a Sprint Business rep. According to him the cell site nearest me is now running n41. Which explains why my LTE-41 speeds are a fraction of what they were a few months back. He mentioned a pretty awesome deal on an S20 if I sign a contract, with a $10 price increase per month in exchange for going from 3 GB of hotspot to 50 GB (which I've wanted anyway), so chances are good I'll bump up to the S20. Apparently it's still a Business Fusion plan so I don't have to pay $$$ extra per month for the phone either. Anyone heard of a $55/mo (or $75/mo) Business Fusion plan with 50GB of hotspot? Any video/VPN throttling to speak of there?
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...